They automatically believe something just because another person said so.
They believe it without seeing any evidence such as a recording, audio tape or dna test etc
Cameras, recordings and dna test don’t lie
They automatically believe something just because another person said so.
They believe it without seeing any evidence such as a recording, audio tape or dna test etc
What's in a label?
Well, in this cause, that person would be naive.
Thanks for MHO
Welcome
Gullible.
Welcome
Opinion
4Opinion
"Trusting"
Though it depends on context, as if they are believing on feeling, trust or merit will vary.
A camera can be edited, AI can alter recordings and DNA tests can be wrong/faked.
Gullible, trusting.
We don't always need solid proof, quite often the word of the right person is sufficient if they are of good character
The "last voice" whisperer needs a "last ear" listener.
„2000 Mules“ believer. 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Naive/gullible/ignorant/ a democrat
naive
Liberal democrat
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions