Do you think that Pam Bondi is covering up the Epstein files?

[Anonymous]

[Chazmatazz269]

Maybe, maybe not. I think her persistent deflection from the topic is rooted in the fact that she will never be allowed to take legal action based on any quantity or quality of evidence. So in order to keep her job, she wants us all to focus on what she is doing and what she wants to do with the power she’s afforded by her overlords.
The fact is that ZERO evidence has directly linked Bondi to Epstein. So she doesn’t benefit at all by covering his misdeeds. Unless someone with power or leverage over her is implicated and they’re influencing her, it just doesn’t hold up.
I think she’s just as much politician as any other lawyer who holds public office. So she spends at least half of her time justifying her job and any time she might have left over trying to enforce and uphold the law.

[AviatorTom]

No I don't. Much ahs been released, complying with the DoJ's instructions.

Perhaps a better question is... Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?

Remember that the Biden Administration had the Epstein files long before Pam Bondi did.

[Friendlybro79]

Why are we still talking about Biden? He should have released them but it's clear both the Republicans and Democrats have stuff to hide including Trump. He didn't release everything and he didn't redact enough to know what really happened and who is implicated.

Also Trump's the one who said he would release it all and he had to be forced to and he still hasn't released everything as ordered. The reality is it's disingenuous to say oh there's nothing to see here, or blaming Biden. Two things are true. He should have released them and Trump's the one who ran on releasing them. Why was he forced to? Why is his name in there thousands of times? When are we going to know the truth and if these victims will get the justice they deserve?

We gotta all be unified in that and not cover for these sick people. We also gotta be ok if you voted for Trump that it's ok to admit for the eli e of God that it's very possible he isn't innocent here. We don't know enough to say how badly he was involved but come on everything that points a finger at Trump as being guilty of anything can't be fake.

This needs to be addressed with dull transparency and Trump is so desperate in deflecting. How can people not see that?

[emeraldsaphire]

They all are. Have you noticed that the supposed Epstein files mention no crimes? It's bread and circuses.

[permanentem]

It's weird how Democrats are so fucking dumb that they think someone is trying to "cover something up" by releasing information on it. Everything that was released was reviewed multiple times and intentionally revealed. So do you just have someone skull fucking you in your ear with a massive schlong scrambling your brains turning them into mush, or were you just born this way?

[OneViewpoint]

Yes. Pam Bondi is a loyal MAGA cult member who doesn't give e shit about her oath of office. Her loyalty is to a dog turd of a man, not her country.

[Dargil]

There is definitely something going on behind the scenes. I'm hoping that it will be revealed.

[MrChinaski]

I think that you grossly over-estimate Bondi's abilities.

[exitseven]

3 million pages have been released. I imagine there will be more.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

You guys believe anything. What can possibly be in 3 million pages?

What can't be said and written in the first 500 to 1,000 pages that it needs 3 million more pages? LOL

[exitseven]

@Hispanic-Cool-Guy I'm not the one that made the file.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

The file is complete BS

[exitseven]

@Hispanic-Cool-Guy I have not seen it and neither have you.

[Chazmatazz269]

https://www.justice.gov/epstein
There’s no need to speculate, guess, or lie. Everything that has been released is publicly available. You can find anything and everything by typing in a few keywords.
The answer to the question “why is there more than 500-1000 pages?” is simple. Epstein’s first conviction was in 2008. His second arrest was in 2019. EVERY document leading up to his first arrest and EVERY document for the next DECADE is included. EVERY text, EVERY email, EVERY recorded phone call for over a decade.
They published every document as well as all documented examinations of those documents and all reports on examinations of those documents. Then there’s every documented response to those reports.
The problem inherent with that ridiculous question is that IF the report was only 500-1000 pages, numbnuts like you would scream “WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?”
Grow up. If you want to know what has been revealed, look. I provided the link. You’re all out of excuses for your ignorance and speculation. Do the work or shut the f*ck up.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

@Chazmatazz269: Proves my point. Only a actual idiot will believe there's actually 3.5 million pages of a investigation and evidence of a dude that was having sex with 12 or 13 years old on some island.

Do you have an idea how ridiculously long is 3.5 million pages?

A person can live 100 years and still won't finish reading that many pages. Won't even come close to it.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Yes. Full exposure of such files will disgrace the president legacy and bring deep shame upon him and his family so she has to keep such information hidden maybe til Trump dies and the files are fully released 20 years from now or something.

[FunkyMonkee]

Whoopi Goldberg and a couple other cast members of The View were also named on the Epstein files!! Now what?

[Bricealan]

This is going to go on ad Nauseum forever. What a god awful waste of time and money

[Friendlybro79]

She changed the freaking subject every question she got so yes she is.

[Anonymous]

Yup. She's complicit. And I can't wait to see this old plastic cunt in handcuffs.

[Jerre]

No, I do not. She is covering up the names of women who did not want to be identified.

[Anonymous]

Trump is covering for Epstein, and Biden is covering for Trump, and Hunter is covering for himself.

[4ngelic]

i'm pretty sure she is.

[Mike_Hum]

Not really. This whole thing is a shit show.

[Mike_Hum]

2017. Jeffrey Epstein's good friend Kathryn Ruemmler explains that she ran Obama's vetting and ethics department and was responsible for vetting all of Obama's cabinet members.

Ruemmler also said that she was saddened because Trump had "debased" the Presidency.

Ruemmler was so close to Epstein that she called the convicted sex offender "Uncle Jeffrey."

[noohair]

No, but she is not savy or smart...

[beefcakebradybatson]

Yes, to please and cover up for her boss.

[Agape93]

Yeap

[In_Trance]

There are no files

[Anonymous]

Obviously