Polls: Society & Politics

One is to victimize Christians, another is to victimize Republicans. Correct?

You have to be on live television and you will be posted on tiktokshorts and stuff. You gotta say you support trump and also say something racist like you support building the wall and gotta send the Mexicans back.

This person owns a 4 ⭐️ beach hotel in a sub Saharan African country

300 rooms,

About $150 a night on average.

“My boy Epps is plugged in! He knows everything!”

Would you want to be friends with them? If not, what’s your reason?

It's extremely insulting Clinton supporters keep blaming us Sanders supporters for Trump getting elected when more Sanders supporters voted for Clinton in 2016 then Clinton supporters did for Obama in 2008

https://jacobin.com/2017/09/clinton-sanders-primary-new-book

• https://abcnews.go.com/US/video/biden-calls-white-supremacy-greatest-threat-us-99337455
• https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/heres-why-biden-calling-white-210500397.html
• https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/14/biden-white-supremacy-howard-university/
• https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/13/biden-howard-university-white-supremacy-terrorism-00096811

Seriously?

I mean even IF everything said about them are true (it’s not), they’re much bigger issues like economic mobility or education.

Even in Europe such easy targets. And they are no roving rape gangs, or those demanding sharia law. That’s stupidity.

But shown above: A) there’s no change in illegals “stealing jobs” and B) they contribute greatly to the economy, so much it could outweigh the weight of our aging population retiring.

https://www.cbpp.org/research/poverty-and-inequality/immigrants-contribute-greatly-to-us-economy-despite-administrations

Yes I realize humanity has long since lived without these modern appliances. but if you had to live without one, which onevwould it be.

I will say…Joe’s hair was always better. Even now. Post mortem

Just belabor my previous posts…because that’s what I do.

Hear me out.

We should have one ruling body at the Federal Level, and it should be the Senate. There should be no President and no Supreme Court. The body which writes the law should interpret and enforce the law. duh. they are the ones who know what it means, since they wrote it.

Every 4 years, we waste billions and billions of dollars on campaign spending for President, and we have stupid Supreme Court rulings such as the courts saying the Senate couldn't ban abortion by Constitutional Amendment with the Roe vs Wade ruling, which was itself Unconstitutional.

I'm 42 years old, and ever president in my lifetime has been an unqualified LOSER. It's time we completely abolish the office of President.

Some laws which should be fundamental in a proposed new constitution:

1) All provably false religions are banned. You can be a Deist, but you cannot be a Polytheist nor worship a man-god.

2) Abolish the Double Jeopardy clause from the constitution. If new evidence or a later admission shows you committed a crime after you were falsely aquitted, you should go back on trial and go to prison or be executed as your crime deserves. (O. J. Simpson et al).

3) A federal law requiring both State, Local, and Federal budgets to be balanced regardless of circumstances. If they fail to balance the budget they must immediately raise taxes to balance the budget.

4) A federal law limiting military spending to 2 percent of GDP unless engaged in a fully declared war.

4b) A Federal law making it illegal to declare an offensive war without some benchmark of a degree of risk, such as having already been attacked on homeland, but limiting counter attacks to those nations and terrorist organizations directly responsible. This would have prevented the Iraq and Afghan wars, and would pretty much require that we declare war on Saudi Arabia and Pakistan instead, if any war should have happened at all.

5) A Federal Law giving control of Energy Infrastructure to Congress.