Questions: Society & Politics

Nobel prize recipients, many PhD's in various professions to come together and say..."Co2" hysteria is just that... hysteria... climate cycles not related to co2 and in general, co2 is helpful It's not easy to buy off people to lie... in large groups, not when their lives, offsprings lives, and careers are on the line. Whom would live a lie so long, in vast numbers? Some do not believe the Co2 "science" is the conclusion...

https://co2coalition.org/media_category/educational/

Such group wrote letter thanking President Trump for removing USA from the Paris Climate Accords. Of course, they received some funding from fossil industry... but do you think they would lie incessantly and put their reputations on the line, if they were just lying to get money?

Other opposing groups do find Co2 "science" as causing terrible life threatening climate change.

NASA... which is a govt organization, and thus, can be politically charged as well. They must believe what they are saying...

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/?_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8HpRVv9oVuSCF0VZQsQUZzqFhGtkLyw06Pme5RT0S-5vbMKKeT7887JYALC3WjAsIKVkac

Mere mortals and less educated are left in the lurch as to align with the political affiliation.

Don't you think science should be able to be more definitive in drawing conclusions?

China's vote seems to be..."we like carbon..."

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/chinas-coal-country-full-steam-ahead-with-new-power-plants-despite-climate-2023-11-30/

They have parachuted in some food, which also killed people as not all parachutes opened. They are talking about building a dock for ships to bring in the amount of food needed but people will stave in the next week or two.

So should the US use their landing craft for peaceful purposes and save the people from starving even though the food will also be used to keep terrorists alive.