Polls: Society & Politics

BREAKING: MSNBC writer, producer admits network has 'made their viewers dumber,' is 'indistinguishable' from Democrat Party: OMG reports - thepostmillennial.com/breaking-msnbc-writer-producer-admits-network-has-made-their-viewers-dumber-is-indistinguishable-from-democrat-party-omg-reports

MSNBC host left stunned by star impeachment witness revealing he is backing Trump because Harris is an existential threat bigger than January 6. Do you agree or disagree that Harris is an existential threat bigger than January 6? - www.dailymail.co.uk/.../...land-endorse-trump.html

There is no way in hell Kamalatoe is at an advantage. The entire administration is a failure!

We have the catastrophic disaster in TN/NC, where by the way, Trump was proactive in responding to this before Xiden or Kamaltoe was. I live near this. It is a catastrophe. News is FEMA is running out of funding already.

Next, we have the port strike.

Then, we have the 100+ missile launch at Israel from Iran.

We already have the influx of illegal aliens paid for at the taxpayers expense. We have the extremely high tensions both domestically and internationally. I have never seen the nation spiral down so badly.

In my opinion, option B is the best!

I believe that both sides should feel safe that there will be no attacks anymore and finally for everyone gets to live in peace while the entire borders should be monitored by both armies and the U. N

For four years as President, Trump promised over and over he'd deliver a great health care plan that would protect everyone.

2017

March 9: "Despite what you hear in the press, healthcare is coming along great. We are talking to many groups and it will end in a beautiful picture!"

March 24: "But I want to have a great health care bill and plan, and we will. It will happen. And it won’t be in the very distant future."

Oct 29: "... we will … have great Healthcare soon after Tax Cuts!"

2019

April 3: "I was never planning a vote prior to the 2020 Election on the wonderful HealthCare package that some very talented people are now developing for me & the Republican Party. It will be on full display during the Election as a much better & less expensive alternative to ObamaCare…"

June 16: "We’re going to produce phenomenal health care. And we already have the concept of the plan. And it’ll be much better health care. We’ll be announcing that in two months, maybe less."

Ten days later: "If we win the House back, keep the Senate and keep the presidency, we’ll have a plan that blows away ObamaCare,

Oct 25: "You’ll have health care the likes of which you’ve never seen,"

2020

July 19 We're signing a health care plan within two weeks,

July 31 "I’ll be signing it sometime very soon."

Aug 3 "hopefully, prior to the end of the month."

2024: JD Vance: There's "concepts of a plan"

After 7.5 years, Trump has failed to deliver a plan despite repeated promises he'd do so soon

If law and order broke down these are the types of people who would murder you to survive..

Out of genuine curiosity, To the people that associate themselves more with the political left, what is your general perception of a conservative?

To the people that associate themselves with the political right, what is your perception of a liberal?

And which way do you lean on most issues?

Not attacking either political side when it comes to this idea. This is an open ended non-partisan question.

Anyway I would absolutely love to see JD Vance debate Kamala Harris and Tim Walz debate Donald Trump.

This would be a very badly needed and informative vantage point for American voters to better analyze VPs/presidential candidates. Reason being it would be much more challenging for all the candidates to prepare for their opponents which is a good thing. It would force candidates to think fast on the spot. Get the truth out.

The VP would likely be the aggressor given they can criticize the presidential candidate given they are the ultimate decision makers when it comes to policy. Also the VP would have to defend their own running mates with the opposing presidential candidate’s criticism. It would be like a hostile & unpredictable interview but not necessarily a fist fight.

It would also give more attention and prominence to the VP’s role, abilities and personality. The VP is after all just one gun shot, heart attack, etc. from being the president of the United States.

If both sides could agree to two debates (and maybe do a coin toss on which match up goes first) it be so much better for the American voter. Because it would expose more strengths and weakness of all the candidates. Give a much better picture of what the American voter is really buying.

Anyway I posted this as a non-partisan question. Please avoid attacking Trump, Kamala, etc right off the bat. However I would love to see this and I imagine so would most other people.

I think if this strike lasts more than two weeks , Trump is President #47 .

The US is producing record amounts of fossil fuels right now, but he's going to open up more federal lands to drilling and fracking, and he says that'll cut engery prices by 50% within a year.

"MSNBC's Nicole Wallace claims women object to JD Vance 'mansplaining' immigration during debate after female moderator offered false fact-check" - thepostmillennial.com/msnbcs-nicole-wallace-claims-women-object-to-jd-vance-mansplaining-immigration-during-debate-after-female-moderator-offered-false-fact-check

"As POLITICO Magazine has noted before, Vance is the first White House wannabe to wear facial hair in 80 years. Our appearance is fundamental to our body language, and research indicates that voters see beards as (surprise, surprise) more masculine," Navarro wrote. "That can be positive to some, reading as strength and competence. But to others, especially women, it can be negative, conveying aggression and opposition to feminist ideals." - Politico: Vance's beard a sign of 'aggression' to women, Walz's 'saucer' eyes showed his 'passion' www.msn.com/.../ar-AA1rC3A8?ocid=sapphireappshare

Felony murder is essentially where anyone involved in a felony that results in the death of a person can be charged with murder. The classic example is that if there's a bank robbery where one robber murders a bank teller the getaway driver can also be charged with murder.

In Minnesota they've recently changed the statute in a manner which will allow potentially hundreds of convicted murderers to be set free. Do you think this is just or unjust?