Did Brock Lesnar retire too early, or was he mentally and physically done?

[Oliverlogan263]

I honestly believe Brock Lesnar’s retirement feels incredibly rushed. Looking at his physique, it really feels like he still had 3 to 4 good years of wrestling left in him, with plenty of major blockbuster matches left in the tank.

At the end of the day, if this retirement is what HE wanted, then it's the best thing for him. We all know Brock has never been a "company guy"—he actually does whatever he wants. What he did out there at WrestleMania was completely unscripted and not planned at all, but he went ahead and did it anyway! After that, he was essentially contractually obliged to perform at SummerSlam in Minnesota.

But looking closely at those last few performances, while he might still be physically capable, mentally he looks completely done. His matches became highly predictable with the exact same repetitive moves, and he wasn't really trying anything new, which usually means he is just no longer interested in the business.

I know some people have pushed back on this take, saying: "Just because he's in great shape doesn't mean he can wrestle for 3–4 more years. He can't go for longer than 10 minutes anymore. Accept that he's done and move on."

Where do y'all stand on this? Do you think Brock actually cut his career short while he still had a few good years left in him, or do you agree that he was mentally and physically checked out and it was the perfect time to walk away?

Yes, his retirement was rushed and could’ve went for a couple of years

No, his time was up and knew he needed to retire

[Coercion_Is_Trauma]

Don't know. Never cared about sports. But i predict that Missouri will win against indiana tomorrow college football. Let's see if this solo tool is worth giving another shot. It is not profrssionally blinded. I knew the event and the odds. And my mind loves underdogs because the payout is higher.

i just remote viewed on my own. I used an older tool that i developed previously for solo remote viewing. It is many times less reliable, i would say at least 10x less reliable than my global server group remote viewing website with paid automated ai incorporation. Easily 20 or even 100x less reliable. But too few people agree to participate in it. It requires more members. I'm about to start hiring psychics and lying to them that i am just doing research. But will see if this solo RV tool is worth using anymore at all, or do i just delete it. The Missouri team is statistically determined to be less likely to win. They are expected to lose. But my silly crystal ball that was unblinded to the study and brought in biases, said they will win. ㅤ

[Coercion_Is_Trauma]

So, today i was remote viewing ad got 9 out of 9 descriptors correct! Teice! Two sessions where i named 9 total descriptors and they matched the real outcome image. That's a statistical chance of less than 0.2% of it happening naturally.

One session with 16 total descriptors, i skipped one, got 2 wrong, and 13 correct. 87% accuracy.

My fourth session today, total 16 but i voted 8/8. Damn. And i feel different, too much thinking. I don't feel enough. And this is why doing it in a group is necessary. I only did total of 4 sessions today. 2 solo and 2 what was supposed to be worldwide web but only 1 person is very active and less than a dozen somewhat interested. We will get something to work.

[Coercion_Is_Trauma]

It was late yesterday so i wrote it confusing.

Yesterday, i did what was supposed to have participants around the world, my website, and got 13 hits for one team and 2 for another. I still do not know which team is which. It will be revealed a day before the event starts.

In the solo rmote viewing tool, where i knew the team and its odds, i described images that i still haven't seen but the program determined that 9 out of 9 descriptors all matched one team, 0 matched the other.

But before sleep i decided another 16 descriptors session on my website. I fescribed the image i expect to see in the future when the program decides to show one based on who wins. Each team has a predetermined set of descriptors (e. g. dark, specific colors) and in my second session, i got 8 descriptors for one team and 8 descriptors for another team.

This was the same obstacle i had with the solo platform earlier.

So it seems that i resolved the issue of target displacement even before migrating to global website method. I can remove displacement solo too and did. The problem is our... our minds?

It becomes a question of what the hell remote viewing even does. Does it collapse probabilities in some quantum physics way? That's why i often slip into perfectly voting 50% one team 50% other team?

I am gonna try figuring this out. If i do, i will use this opinion to post my predictions. If i find a model of remote viewing the outcomes with accuracy.

[Coercion_Is_Trauma]

See, some sports matches are probably truly non-remote-viewable. And some probably are collapsed into reality by fate. Is this possible?

Like, have you noticed somrtimes fate seems to be real?

What if a player losing a game will mean his life ends somehow? So fate will ensure they win? That is why we can remote view it? And other games are truly undetermined by fate? Because i just had a group of people remote view and the results are shocking. Perfect 50/50 on both teams after 4 people remote viewed, total of 64 descriptors. This isn't the first time.

[Coercion_Is_Trauma]

Look. The fact that we are capable of remote viewing means we are capable of changing the course of events. Right? Because if we weren't able to change futures then that would mean we should give up and money will flow to us either way. Which means not all things are pre determined.

I sound like i am talking to myself but i am just reposting here what ibwrote to someone in private chats.

[Coercion_Is_Trauma]

Recrivrd more submissions. Still results are evenly split between the teo teams in this match.

This means that we can only remote view that which doesn't contradict with fate. But not everything is determined by fate.

[Coercion_Is_Trauma]

Wait. Wtf did i write. I meant to say: we can not remote view the outcome of...

Wait. Hmmm. Maybe my trance like slip up is onto something. Predetermined thinfs are what prevent us from remote viewing some other things.

But also in order to remote view an outcome then the outcome has to be pre determined.

[Coercion_Is_Trauma]

See? My crystal ball didn't lie. They won againat the odds like i predicted. Why did i predict it? I remote viewed a 9 out of 9 descriptors of the image that was assigned to them winning. Now i will look at the image. I was remote viewing myself in the future seeing the image. But imagine: 9 multiple choice options. Each has 2 choices (belonging to one of the outcomes) and i choose all of them that were ascribed to this team's victory. The odds of choosing 9 of them in a row just for 1 team are 1 in 512. But as i said, i already did the same shit twice on the same day, so it isn't a 1 in 512 occurance to me. And, since the team actually won, the chances are even lower.

[molonski2]

There is a lot of show , but a lot of pain , roids and God knows what else , it's time.
Go out on top , invest well and make sure you don't have to come back..

The pain killers , Roids and T it will get you everytime.

[Anonymous]

Maybe he could have but I am sure he has enough money to retire so why shouldn't he?

[exitseven]

He was ready to retire. I imagine that he went on his own terms. He must have a great deal if money and will have a career as a spokesmsn ot work in show biz

[NathanDavis]

how well he is, or he isn't... not about his looks

it's about his medical records

[Iron_Man]

What did Brock do at Wrestlemania that was unscripted and crazy