Which of these two places would you rather visit?

[meganfoxwannabe67]

Big Bend, Texas national park. Go camping in the darkest skies of North America, hike in the desert, camp in the mountains, see canyons, etc.

Visby, Sweden. Explore this quaint, medieval town. Go in a bicycle around the town, visit the castle, churches, history, etc.

[Smoke-n-Growls]

Oh, man, I've never been to Sweden before and I really love Scandinavia countries. I'd prefer to visit Sweden. Plus I could look at how they design their cities and be jealous - so much more to walkable and bikable and less cars and pollution.

Big Bend would be neat but, like, once you leave the national park America is all the same stroad with the McDo's, Starbucks, Taco Bells, etc. It's all the same and it's all car infrastructure. It's boring.

[NamerOfStars]

They both sound cool- but I'm not much of a camper (not as able any more, with current distribution issues), so I'll go with Sweden, and its delicious candy fish. Bonus points: the spell checker prompted me to correct that to "insidious candy fish", which I think is the name of my new band.

[zagor]

Sweden. I have desert, rattlesnakes, scorpions in my neighborhood or within an hour drive.

[Blueeyes81]

I said B simply because I don't care for Texas. I need more greenery and less tan.

[MTC29]

I haven't visited Sweden, so I voted accordingly.

[shortster]

Sweden. Texas gets too hot.

[ChrisMaster69]

Would go for Sweden

[mandyfire98]

Sweden

[exitseven]

I pick Texas.

[KostasKouvalis]

Visby

[Iron_Man]

Stockholm Sweden