Questions: Trending & News

Recently a man shot an armed robber who aimed a gun at his children.
What would you have done?
If not, what would you have done instead for your children?

www.yahoo.com/.../...robber-pointed-124758681.html

So these Arabians decide to invade Israel and lose land at the process, then cry like little babies? Wow.

Am I missing something?

So it appears a sobering studying came out on spanking and violence. Check it out below.
http://www.sheknows.com/parenting/articles/1137263/spanking-kids-dating-violence

So the latest word is that American military families in *South* Korea should leave the country immediately.

Americans have a habit of being led by false pretences into war, from the Gulf of Tonkin to the invasion of Cambodia, to the invasion of Grenada, and of course most recently the Iraq War. They also have a habit of blind loyalty to the actions of the government when under a perceived threat, and then regretting it (or pretending to regret it) when the dust settles.

The current President, love him or hate him, is seen by many as using the situation in North Korea as a deflection. A reason to keep him in power. Now, I'm not sure Trump would instigate a nuclear war just out of spite or to keep a position I'm not even sure he wants anymore. But I am wondering, how the American people would feel about being the nuclear aggressor in this situation?

North Korea is run by a lunatic, but the people are innocent. If anything, they are oppressed under their leadership. But nuclear weapons don't discriminate. And if the Iraq/Afghanistan conflicts have taught us anything, its that civilian lives don't matter too much to the top brass.

So the question : - IF America launches a nuclear first strike against North Korea, would you (as an American) support this decision?

Feminism's massive influence on society has taken us from traditional morals and gender roles to an age of female entitlement. But in the last several years, men's groups like MGTOW have risen from the ash heap of male privilege to challenge it. Then last year feminism suffered its biggest setback yet when Hillary lost the election to a chauvinistic serial groper. Feminists wept and MGTOW cheered as Trump rolled back Title IX protections for women.

However, the tides may have turned again now that male executives, producers and journalists everywhere are getting fired over sexual assault claims. These incidents confirm the very things feminism has always preached -- that men are predators and women are victims. The president who embodied male entitlement is now under investigation and many of his toxic male cohorts in the White House are gone.

Yet the more success and power that women achieve at men's expense, the more it calls into question their status as victims deserving special treatment. How can it be claimed that women's voices are ignored and disbelieved when they are bringing down powerful CEOs and media moguls on an almost daily basis? These doubts chip away at the foundations of feminism and provide an opening for a MGTOW comeback.

So which of these rabid groups is currently winning the war: MGTOW or the FEMINISTS?