Search Results: controlling men

Spider-Man Noir probably loses a clean, fair 1v1 against most modern Spider-Men because their raw feats, speed, agility, spider-sense, and experience against superpowered enemies are usually higher.

But Noir’s advantage is not a fair superhero-style fight. He is more of a detective/hunter type: darker, more tactical, and more willing to use stealth, traps, weapons, ambushes, intimidation, and dirty tactics.

My argument for how Noir could win is that he would try to make himself the only Spider-Man in the fight who can actually use webs effectively.

Against Spider-Men with technological web shooters, like MCU Peter or Andrew Garfield’s Spider-Man, Noir could target the devices first. If he damages or disables their web shooters, then the fight becomes much more even: spider-sense, agility, acrobatics, pain tolerance, and close-quarters instincts — but with Noir still having access to his own webbing and gear.

Against a Spider-Man with organic webbing, like Tobey Maguire’s Peter, Noir obviously cannot just break the web shooters. So he would have to attack Peter’s mental state instead. Tobey’s Peter has shown that his organic webbing can fail when he is emotionally conflicted or not in the right mental state. Noir could use fear, guilt, darkness, misdirection, psychological pressure, or carefully staged distractions to try to make Peter unable to use his webs at all.

Noir’s pain tolerance and darker mindset might help him survive the kind of brutal, psychological fight he would need to create, but that alone would not be enough because most Spider-Men are also extremely resilient.

So I do not think Noir wins by being physically superior. I think he only has a real chance if he turns the fight into sabotage, ambush, battlefield control, and mental pressure instead of a clean brawl.

Could Spider-Man Noir defeat other Spider-Men in a 1v1 matchup?

A pro-life writer based in Nashville asks, “Are men the future of the pro-life movement?”

Christopher Kuehl says if men heard 1 million babies were being killed on the Southern border, they would immediately spring into action. But news of 1 million ab*rtions annually brings little widespread response. Kuehl examines the main reasons he thinks men are less publicly pro-life than they should be, including being cowed by the message of feminism and the vague language used around that.

Watch the full story: ow. ly/CXRb50Z6csV

Men absolutely should be part of the future of the pro-life movement. The idea that men should stay silent on abortion because they are men is one of the most damaging feminist framings in the debate. If unborn children are human beings, then defending them is not “controlling women.” It is a moral responsibility that belongs to both men and women.

What do you think?…

This historian is well worth following:

https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/may-9-2026

"If you google the history of Mother’s Day, the internet will tell you that Mother’s Day began in 1908 when Anna Jarvis decided to honor her mother. But “Mothers’ Day”—with the apostrophe not in the singular spot, but in the plural—actually started in the 1870s, when the sheer enormity of the death caused by the Civil War and the Franco-Prussian War convinced writer and reformer Julia Ward Howe that women must take control of politics from the men who had permitted such carnage. Mothers’ Day was not designed to encourage people to be nice to their mothers. It was part of women’s effort to gain power to change society."

To marry a girl you have to accept this:

Girls are far less agreeable than men. Like my girl won’t even move in with my parents (we have a mansion) just for 6-12 months until we can afford a really nice home.
It’s usually men negotiating around the wife like she’s some boss.

Girls use their emotions and tears to manipulate and control men.

No girl kept their legs closed. Do I need to say more. It’s sad.

You even see girls on hen dos disrespect their husband on their nights out. The respect for men has gone.

Women love the kids 100x more than any husband so you will be the first that gets thrown under the bus in hardship.

Marriage/divorce is still a legal contract like it was in 1960s - so in a breakup the woman gets the kids, money, house everything.
Girls are mean they’ll use guys and spit them out. They take everything in divorce.

It sucks for men because it’s either that or be single. So we are forced to make a bad option. Men are forced to be a simp or be single forever. That’s such an upsetting decision to have to make.

Men only get married to make the woman happy, we don’t care about it.

A woman couldn’t really date a guy that worked at McDonald’s or didn’t earn money unless he’s in college. A man’s career and money are so important. Not to mention women put a lot of emphasis on things a man actually cannot control like height. they put your human value on these things.
Men don’t do this.

Men just care if the girl is pretty and nice. There’s endless pretty girls and it just goes to show that men actually like the girl for her. For actual genuine reasons. The bar is so low for men.

It often seems like they want more and more from men. As in it’s never enough, a man can always be better looking, have more money etc..

I would guess women. at least gen Z girls seek guys that are perfect, just like my girlfriend. She found him, she’s lucky!

There’s a million metrics women judge us on. Often things you can’t control, like height looks and big w1lly size etc.. and things that require so much effort like a top career and high income. Perfect guys like me are unicorns 🤗

Men just want a pretty girl, which isn’t rare women can even fake it, and a girl that’s nice. The bar is so low. Men are real ones.