Search Results: transmissions

I was interested in what the badges signify and I thought you might be too if you haven't had time to delve into their meaning, or perhaps like myself not reached the highest level on GAG's.

Below is my understanding is what the badges mean.

Yoda - Is the Jedi Master from Star Wars known for his wisdom, and the name is possible from Sanskrit or Hebrew roots, and is synonymous with wisdom, sage, mentor, and patience.

Master - The Pen Nib is a symbol of thought and authority, and throughout history gifting a pen has symbolized intellect, trust, and the transmission of wisdom. It is closely tied to the concept of "the pen is mightier than the sword," highlighting the power of ideas.

Explorer - An owl reading a book is a potent symbol combining the natural characteristics of the owl with the human pursuit of knowledge, representing wisdom, lifelong learning, scholarly study, and the quiet pursuit of truth.

Guru - A Guru is one that removes the darkness of ignorance, and is often likened to a pair of glasses or a lens. Glasses are seen as symbols of intellectual or spiritual "sight" representing wisdom gained rather than just eyesight, and coloured blue glasses cause the person to see the world in a different way.

Which Badge level are you?

LMFAO! This is what the AI said:

Major threats to the end of humanity along with their estimated likelihoods within the next century:

Unaligned Artificial Intelligence (AI): Approximate likelihood 1 in 10. This involves superintelligent AI systems whose goals may not align with human values, posing the highest anthropogenic extinction risk.

Engineered Global Pandemic: Approximate likelihood 1 in 30. This threat includes artificially created infectious diseases with high lethality and fast transmission.

Nuclear War: Lower but significant risk, possibly around 1 in 100 or more. While nuclear war could cause catastrophic destruction, total human extinction is debated.

Climate Change Failure: Moderate risk, roughly 1 in 10 to 1 in 20. While it could cause global calamity, it is less likely to lead to complete extinction.

Nanotechnology Risk: Lower and uncertain likelihood. Potential risks include misuse or accidents involving molecular nanotechnology.

Natural Catastrophes (asteroids, supervolcanoes, stellar explosions, coronal mass ejection, gamma rays,): Very low likelihood, roughly 1 in 1,000,000 per century combined. These events are rare but

Experts estimate the risk of human extinction this century may be around 1 in 6 (17%), with large uncertainties. Man-made risks are considered much more probable than natural.

i drink on average 2-3 cups of milk a day, the body uses the lactose to produce a special fat used to coat nerves and speed up transmission

I didn't include nuclear. My reason being that it's not really natural as much as I support nuclear energy 100%. I also think by early 2100s room temperature super conductivity will be a reality on the grid so heat loss through electrical transmission will be solved.

Anyway, all have their pros and cons. I think tidal & geothermal have REALLY big potential. My local utility is subsidizing under ground heat pump installation and some municipalities are experimenting with tidal generation; there is so much unused water front property that it just makes sense.

In many cases, a combination of these innovations is energy neutral like using solar to lift mass for a gravity battery to run at night.

Fun fact: ONE space elevator with a gravity generator & a large (were talking hundreds of sq km) solar power array can generate enough power for entire 1st world nations.

"This person was a lawyer for RFK's campaign, and is not RFK's personal lawyer. Otherwise, this petition is unrelated to RFK. The headline is completely misleading because it makes it seem like this petition was on behalf of RFK. But the petition was on behalf of some other client of this law firm, unrelated to RFK.
This is about one particular polio vaccine (not all of them), which the FDA is alleged to have violated their own review and approval procedures for. The petition is asking for the FDA to withdraw its approval and conduct a scientifically valid trial that adheres to their own guidelines. In this case, it appears that the FDA's safety study only examined a 3 day period following injection. The FDA's own guidelines say that the review period should be much longer, especially for children where the FDA has said the review period needs to be multiple years since developmental disorders can take time to be diagnosed.
It also seems like the product is misleadingly labeled and marketed as a vaccine since it does not (according to the CDC) prevent some forms of infection and transmission, which makes it not a vaccine since it doesn't grant immunity (unless you use very recent claims that the definition is different).
The petition was from 2022, not recently. The lawyer has said on record that this petition was on behalf of a client. It's unrelated to RFK or Trump, both of whom are on the record saying they don't want to reduce access to vaccines.
This petition has nothing to do with autism and doesn't mention it.
The petition itself does nothing. It gives the FDA a chance to respond. If they did a proper study that adheres to guidelines from medical research, their own procedures, and guidance from the NIH and CDC, it should be easy to respond."

I hear it and i read it all the time so many talking about how they have a cellphone they don't need a CB radio. They point out how they can contact anyone in the world with their cellphone they can share photos to their relatives and friends even on the other side of the world. They can do transactions play games and even do videos and print from their cellphone. And so why should they have something like a CB radio. So why you ask? It can be summed up in 4 words (The Internet Kill Switch), search that up. CB radios all work well even the cheapest CB radios the $50 dollar ones with a good antenna that is such as a K30 or Tram 300 for mobile antenna or the 5/8 high gain antenna for base roughly $150.

When the power goes out CB radios go right on working and that is because CB's transmit by antennas and their transmissions are received by all other CB antennas with in reach. CB radios are cheap they need no license to operate and once bought it never again cost a dime to use it. They are easy to install too and where all other form of communication will and do fail CB radios go right on working they will not.

Given all the facts above for those who have invested so much confidence in their cellphones who think CB radios are lacking and pointless, does any of the above chance your mind?

For context we live in germany and my wife starts a new Job, for 2 years, about 40km away.

We need a fuel efficient car, thats reliable and lasts long. Most of the driving takes place on the Autobahn, which is blocked by Traffic jam in the afternoon.

Our two Favourites are currently:
Toyota Yars Hybrid fuel efficient as hell, but not on Autobahn. But in the traffic jams and within the city. Costs used about 18k€.

Hyndai i10, regular gas powered car, fuel efficient yes, but still 1L/100km more than the Yaris. But costs 5k less, about 13k€ used.

I10 costs 200€ less in insurance, so over the next 2 years the overall costs are about the same. After that we are not sure where my wife will work, if she works in the closest big city, the Yaris will be cheaper with barely 3L/100km.

Also Yaris is automatic transmission, much easier and comfortable to drive. Which is good if she sits in the car over an hour long per day.

Also anyone knows which built year we should look for?

As far as i see both cars were updated into the next generation in 2020.