Think it doesnt? Change my mind.
Does this image accurtely represent the 5 different classes of men in a given society?
Think it doesnt? Change my mind.
What incel created this thing? 😂😂
For starters, a hierarchy in society is much much more complicated. Next to that, attraction is really often quite irrational and complicated. The premise of 5 classes existing is just utter bullshit.
For example, say someone has an 8/10 face but isn't athletic.
Where does he fit in? Not with the slayer. Not with the Chad. Not with the normie. Not with incel nor with genetic trash.
What if someone is physically a 5/10 but is the most kind, confident, funny, chill guy ever? Definitely not a slayer, not a Chad but also not a normie. Normie requires him to be submissive and insecure.
The classes created here is done by a simpleton with complete disregard for any sense of reality only looking at things in black and white.
Then there is the extraordinarily biased way of writing, which already defeats any sense of credibility. On normies "they are seen as cucks and betas to manipulate and exploit".
Let's also just laugh at 30% of society being an incel. It's pretty dumb.
One question though, assuming 5/10 is average, how is it possible that 94.9% scores 4 or 5 or lower. How the bloke who designed this - God he needs help - clearly doesn't understand the concept of average.
And even then In disregarding the vast differences between what women/gay men find attractive.
There most certainly is also a lot of disparity in that.
The pic assumes a simplistic and rather delusional view of males in general while simplifying how attraction works.
What the creator of this pic should have done is just physical differences where certain types of guys have an advantage instead of this grade A incel shit lmao
I agree the chart needs to be revised just for physcial characteristics. For the most part its accurate
@animus1988 nope, it's quite inaccurate and just dumb.
Nope its legit. There are exceptions but i guarantee if you pull 100 random guys off the street 90% of would easily fit into 1 of these 5 categories. Id bet money on that too
@animus1988
Lmao nope. These categories are way too simplistic and made by a simpleton.
You'd lose money for sure.
Pick 10 random guys from the internet, post there pics here and i guarantee 9 out 10 i will fit into 1 of the 5.
If someone is a 6 out of 10 and isn't muscly, he already doesn't fit.
If someone has the face of an 7 but isn't fit, it doesn't fit.
If someone has the face of 8/10 but doesn't have broad shoulders, it doesn't fit.
If someone is normally a 4/10, but has muscles, it doesn't fit.
The chart is stupid.
It's a dumb chart made by some incel.
You'd put them in these categories because you bought in the stupidity of these categories. But when looking at the criteria for every category, it's very obvious that it's delusional.
Normie regular
Chad low tier
Chad high tier
Normie low tier
There easy.
Body only accounts for 20% while face is 60% and height is 20%. Not all factors have equal weight. Thought this was obvious.
wait... im 6.1 high, work out, 139 IQ... but... i mean, is a prominent nose minus 3 or minus 4? 😄 this is a serious issue, i have to find my drawer of self esteem !
you're most likely somewhere in the chad category then. You can't be a slayer cateogry unless u have no facial flaws.
wow thanks bro.
and... if I love all kinds of Rock, including Slayer? there must be a workaround for everything! 😄
Yea that would put you in the incel category now im pretty sure
😂
so humour has a negative effect? im triggered. so as my guitar.
No listening to slayer has the negative effect bro. Brushing up on those reading comprehension skills will have a positive effect though 👍🏽
But for real your IQ is probably closer to 100.. if i had to guess
🙂👍
Maybe high 90s i am being nice today
But in all seriousness a big nose does drop your score pretty significantly
I think it's rather ridiculous, cruel and childish to categorize every person this way. Imagine being of of those people pictured that is being labeled genetic trash or incel. I mean these people are now a meme for the way they look? How awful.
I personally think the guys on the top row look unappealing because they aren't smiling and they look mean. I also don't see a huge difference between the bottom 3 categories. "Genetic trash" because you don't like the way they look? What's this world coming to?
Such a hater.😊
one of*
I need sleep
@IntuitiveMuffin I'm a hater? :) why?
Tell this poor guy that his belief is rather ridiculous. So mean.😂😂
@IntuitiveMuffin I give up! I'm going to bed.
Yea its sad some people are better looking than others but its just the truth. Its rather rideculous to deny that there isn't a looks hierarchy in society.
Are you saying the guys who aren't smiling aren't attractive? Are you seriously gonna try and pretend like yoi find any of the guys in bottom row sexually attractive?
It just depends on their personality completely. The guy in the red shirt (not normie, that thumbs up is not appealing) looks like he's fun. I actually prefer the incel guys to the others. I'm not lying.
there's two guys in the red shirt. The guy with glasses and thumbs up. Which one are you saying "looks fun"
Glasses guy.
Its probably cus the thumbs up guy looks goofy holding up his thumb like that so it makes him less appealing.
No, not it.
So you're telling me if the glasses guy was doing a thumbs up you would still find him more appealing than the current thumb ups guy?
Yes, I seriously like that guy. The thumbs up guys looks too enthusiastic and fake. The guy in glasses and the red shirt looks like he is trying to show me something funny.
Generally speaking are all men different and unique and have a own set of mind. I would not put anyone in a corner. I judge based on personality like anyone should. I guess the Normies are the best here.
No one ever said they aren't different and unique. the point is that there is a hierarchy based on looks.
And you seriously telling me you would prefer to go on a date with one of the normies as oppose to one of the chads or slayers
I hate that I'm laughing at the sheer immaturity of the name "slayer" and "genetic trash"
there's two guys with red shirts. The glasses and thumbs up. you're saying the incel with glasses is attractive?
Yeah, I think he looks like fun. You don't understand my background, the last guy I was with attracted way too much attention and was flirty with women, I think he cheated on me even though he denies it. I'm going for a guy that not every girl is flirting with next time. I want someone with a good personality.
I don't want to have to fight for a guy and have my heart broken again.
But everyone thinks they have a good personality lol what criteria do you use to judge a guys personality.
Funny, lighthearted, kind, loving, smart, lots of interests...
Wtf is lighthearted
Like fun, laid back, chill, likes to have fun and good times.
Those are such ambiguous and generalized charecteristics lol. What person doesn't like to have fun and a good time. The interesting thing is just like with looks these characteristics you listed are all subjective. Everyone has a different idea of what fun is. Whats your idea of fun
Not being combative? ;) I need some sleep nn, say hi
say hi to your 4chan buddies. *
Add me on here
I've never been on 4chan once in my life for the record.
Lol wow. No not all of the male portion of our species fits into five categories. Doesn’t that sound silly?
I feel like I am 15 all over again looking at this seriously and contemplating it.
Wow aren’t you a ray of sunshine🤣
You’re the idiot since you obviously missed the glaring sarcasm in my response.
And it’s sad that you think it’s just sooo accurate.
It’s when guys like you who believe in some invisible elitist hierarchy; that they fall victim to it. You’re trapping yourself in your own Insecurities and projecting them out onto other people.
This post is becoming a jerk magnet, I'm going to bed.
@newPython Yet... you're here to read it.
Lol exactly my point loser
*whoosh*
Opinion
5Opinion
What a load of shit. What it represents is someone who is judgmental as hell who decided to make a chart.
You sound upset. Obviously this chart has struck a chord with your emotions. Yes talking about genetics and looks is a tough discussion to have but a necessary one
I'm not upset. I'm just opinionated and outspoken. If I think something is BS then I say so.
So why is bullshit then. Are you denying that the majority of men and women instantly categorize each other based on appearance/genetics/handsomeness?
Of course they recognize how good looking someone is. That's one of the first things they notice. But no, I don't think people categorize like that. That chart isn't about looks. It's about judging the hell out of people based on their looks.
Its subconscious bro. People instantly make subconscious judgments about people based on their face/bone structure/etc studies have shown this. a lot of our brain wiring is still primitive and subconscious we are prisions to our own biology
There are studies that show just about anything. Yes people judge, but this chart is way too extreme. Come on now. "Genetic trash"? "There is no hope for these people"? It sounds like a high school kid trying to be clever and funny.
I think you are taking studies and biology and totally misapplying it, and exaggerating the hell out of it.
Its hyperbole with realistic undertones. The chart is obviously exaggerated but generalized idea that looks are extremely important still stands
So now it's hyperbole instead of accurately represents?
Look, if you have something to say, just say it. If you want to say that looks make a difference, then the large majority of people would agree with you. Then people can discuss how much it matters, and how it affects people. But that's not what you're doing here.
Anyway, I'm done for the night.
Thats exactly what im saying and exactly what the chart represents. Looks are the most important factor in regards to attraction. Thats what im saying. The details on the chart are hyperbole but the guidlines and 5 cateogries are as legit as it gets buddy
Probably a little more complex than what it shown but generally ok.
Nooooo, don't buy into this!
@isabells. Lol its not perfect but the idea that there is a looks hierarchy is just reality.
Why are so insistent in trying to pretend like it doesn't exist and everyone is born equally good looking?
Everyone is attracted to different people. I don't agree with this hierarchy chart.
So in your opinion is the curve for attraction distrubted equally among all people? Do you deny that there are people in society (models) who are percieved as more physically attractive to the general norm of population?
Yes and they are well known but ask any group of men and they will all find different women attractive. They will also probably find some average girl in their past just as attractive because they know her and love her personality. Like certain features, etc. Everyone one is different.
I dont know about that. Im pretty sure 99% of guys would victorias ssecret model or any model for that model is hotter than their ex or some rando girl on the street. Pretty sure the same applies for women if you show them a picture of a male model vs some random guy off the street. This means that there a GENERALIZED standard for beauty across the board. Do you disagree with this also?
There is what the media wants to sell you. Like plastic boobie girls are desirable. I'm not talking about comparing a random guy or girl though, I was talking about someone you know. I know 100% that I would choose my ex right now over any male model because I still love him.
Wait im confused didn't u literally just saw in another post you would pick the guy with glasses over your ex becuase is less likely to have women flirt with him? Or is this a different ex we are talking about now
I didn't say I would pick him over my ex, I said the next one will be like that. Unfortunately I still love my ex even though I don't want to.
Lol see. You like him becuase you see him as high value and being able to attract other women. That is really what yorue attracted to it sounds like. The idea of dating a man who is physcially attractive to other women
No, I loved him before I knew he attracted the women. You don't know my relationship and I don't care to explain it.
Would you say this kid fits in the Chad slayer or normie category just in regards to looks?
I wonder why the poster would ask us this when he is at the bottom of the ranking--genetic trash. smh
Fantastic post.. thanks...
Wow. Someone has a high view of himself. lol
Where did i ever post anything about myself? Lol.
You just did lol
Uh no. What did i say specifically pertaining to myself? Id love to know
I see. So, where do you fall under the chart you posted?
Why does it matter? This thread isn't about me or any individual person. Its about examining a hierarchical structure in society.
I thought so. Back to my original observation: Someone has a high view of himself. lol
Lol okay then.
This photo is hilarious
Genetic trash lol😂
Those poor guys. D:
I really want to play dungeons and dragons with them and the incels. They seem like my kind of people. :)
I really would.
Because I would spend time with those guys? Where are you and OP even from that people are this shallow?
I don't understand you is what I'm saying.
"hot chick" is offensive. You don't know those guys are basement dwellers.
Looooool. How is hot chick offensive? Id love to hear your answer. this should be good.
I'm not going to keep arguing with you. Anyway, you must've obtained this from 4chan or somewhere similar.
How do I manage to get sucked into these arguments? lol
Lol not arguing Im genuinely curious as to how hot chick could be considered an insult. Pls respnd lol
I'm a woman not a chick for one thing.
Next time you call me a dude ill remember that. "Im not a dude im a man you know!"
I almost forgot how offensive it was to be called a dude so thanks for that
I didn't call you a dude.
Have you ever called a guy dude Or do you find that term too offensive to use?
Why would that be offensive... to be a macho cowboy? Better than a chicken.
Why would it be offensive to be called a chick then? Better than an obese whale. No?
They are both offensive and demeaning.
Yeah, this isn't going anywhere. lol
Lol nah the reality is neither need to be deemed offensive you gotta be less sensitive ;)
@2shredded
Nothing on this site ever goes anywhere lol
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions