Tonita91996 wants to hear from Guys only. Login to share your opinion.
- Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 y
Tattooed people have hearts too. Not all tattooed people are vicious mean people. They just happened to like body art. You might be surprised what's under their clothes. That's the exciting part of having a relationship with a tattooed person.
10 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
I am dating a woman with tatoos now. Normally tatoos are a huge turn off for me but my current date has such a great personality that I decided to overlook that requirement.
02 Reply- +1 y
See that is a lot of people's problems they don't believe in giving people a chance they want to judge a book by its cover. You all act like some people without tattoos aren't shitty.
- +1 y
I wouldn't say it is because people with tatoos are shitty or anything like that. Tatoos have just been a turn off for me since I was a child. I just never liked tatoos. Whether it was on a guy or woman. So it is not even a question of who I am dating. It just a general thing. Also, all the women I have gone on dates this year didn't have tatoos but were just not of character I consider good.
What Guys Said
- u+1 y
I will quote @cth96190, because I agree with every word he said: "Hell no! Aside from disfiguring a woman, tattoos are a form of self harm that screams psychological problems.
I prefer women who are sane and who are not qualified to audition for the role of tattooed woman at a circus."116 Reply- +1 y
Have you ever gave a woman a chance with a lot of tattoos or you just judge by what someone else said.
- +1 y
The two options you laid out are not all of the options.
I don't need others to tll me what to think, as I am quite independent and strong-willed. And it is not necessary to give something a chance to know that I shouldn't do that; I don't need to cut off my hand to realize that would be a stupid thing to do.
I have met many people of both sexes who were covered in tattoos. There are some tings that most of them have in common. They believe that having tattoos is a way of expressing themselves and that, alone, is sufficient justification for getting tattoos; that, alone, is stupid. . . in my opinion. They have given little thought to the idea of what those tattoos will look like 50 years from now. They care not one bit about the fact that many other people are repulsed by tattoos. Having tattoos has the effect of ostracizing you from a part of our culture. Many of them have some body dysphoria. As an employed, I would NEVER hire an employee who has visible tattoos, visible piercings, extra holes in their ears, or who smokes; al of those things are simply too stupid for me to tolerate.. And, frankly, I have never seen a girl who became more attractive because she had a tattoo.
I'm sure you will disagree with everything I said and I really don't care. These are my opinions, and I am entitled to those opinions, just as you are entitled to have your opinions and disagree with me. - +1 y
Since you like to play the blocking and removing game.
- +1 y
Like every other user, you are subject to the posting guidelines:
"Member Posts – We do not allow members to talk negatively of other GAGers in posts.
For example, "[username] is a stupid jerk!" will be removed.
- ALL *Questions and Takes* about specific members in a negative way are removed as Member Posts."
https://www.girlsaskguys.com/faq/posts - +1 y
So you are allowed to talk negative under what I post it sounds like you are a hypocrite
- +1 y
Perhaps you should re-read what I wrote. You asked a question about a hypothetical girl and I respond with general statements about people with tattoos. You then asked for me to elaborate. Where did I say something derogatory ABOUT YOU?
- +1 y
Because you said that you wouldn't hire anyone with tattoos when a lot of people I know have tattoos we aren't baby boomers we come two or three generations past when you were young. And when I said it doesn't matter what you think because you are old you remove my post. You only have three decades to live and you at the point where you can retire nobody wants an old person to work they rather have an young person like me than you.
- +1 y
Because you said that you wouldn't hire anyone with tattoos when a lot of people I know have tattoos we aren't baby boomers we come two or three generations past when you were young. And when I said it doesn't matter what you think because you are old you remove my post. You only have three decades to live and you at the point where you can retire nobody wants an old person to work they rather have an young person like me than you.
- +1 y
"Because you said that you wouldn't hire anyone with tattoos when a lot of people I know have tattoos" That is not a derogatory statement about anyone, and it is certainly not a statement ABOUT YOU.
"we aren't baby boomers we come two or three generations past when you were young." So what?
"And when I said it doesn't matter what you think because you are old you remove my post." Your post was removed because of a derogatory statement directed AT ME.
"You only have three decades to live and you at the point where you can retire nobody wants an old person to work they rather have an young person like me than you." Are you ready to come to work at my office as an attorney? Are you sure that my clients would prefer to have you representing them? WHat are your qualifications to begin work as an attorney? - +1 y
Yes you are look at the time line if you are 67 you are at retirement age why should I listen to some 40 years older than me versus what has changed since you were my age. Things has changed a lot this isn't back in the 1960s and 1970s where people don't live the same anymore. Back then black folks weren't acceptable for a lot of high positions like president. But do you see people giving colored folks a hard time now like they did back then although segregation and slavery was over. No
- +1 y
"But do you see people giving colored folks a hard time now like they did back then although segregation and slavery was over. No" And that is something that YOUR generation accomplished?
- +1 y
Yeah like my generation of people are more likely to have tattoos than people back in your generation. Why should I listen to what you have to say about people that is the same thing you are discriminating against people with tattoos if you don't even know them personally.
- +1 y
"Why should I listen to what you have to say" I don't care if you listen or not, but don't ask people to express their opinions and then whne because they don't agree with you. Next question, at the very beginning, just say: 'here's what I believe. Please don't respond unless you agree with me.' It's quite simple.
"you are discriminating against people with tattoos if you don't even know them personally." There is nothing wrong with discrimination if you understand the actual meaning of the word. - +1 y
Actually I was proving a solid point that is discriminating because what if someone had a lot of tattoos and realized that they made a lot of stupid choices and they can't afford all that money to remove them. It is easier to get them to get rid of them. I can tell you haven't grown as a person you are stuck in your stuck up attitude ever since the 1970s. Sorry that I didn't live in the 70s and 80s to be as judgmental as you are. Not everyone is going to take kindly of what you say I didn't say to go on a spill telling me about how much people with tattoos suck as people.
- +1 y
Especially talking to someone who grow up without DVDs cell phones and big screen televisions.
- +1 y
Sure. However...
Although I have a few tattoos myself, I would prefer girls chose not to get any in certain spots, mainly because a woman's body is like a work of art by itself. Not a philosophy of mine, or anything, its just how I see them. ESPECIALLY her neck, legs, and midriff; and even more specifically, it actually irks me a bit when she has one on her upper legs. I don't know what it is about a girl's hips & thighs that I find so beautiful - but even an average woman with decently smooth legs, gives me the same feeling I get when I see a statue artfully sculpted out of marble. So when its a girl who has really nice legs - or even if her body is even only moderately firm/shapely - I honesty want to say thats like slapping God in the face (and I'm not actually religious)... but it is odd that is she is wearing sheer thigh-high stockings, it is literally the sexiest thing I have even seen; Again, I don't know why, but some of my exes figured out that if they wanted me to... you know... they only had to put on a pair, and I would have a sore jaw a few hours later.
Anyway, the point I'm making here, is that as a woman, you never know what a man might get stirred by, and average women ever seem to fully grasp how attractive, alluring, and sexy they often appear to us guys. Even if a girl is not actually pretty, chances are there is at least some part of them that could easily turn a man's head. NOT that being attractive is necessary, or even important at all, but women's culture too often leaves girls with a severe lack of confidence... so since you cannot possibly improve the way your bare-skin looks, keep in mind that you might be taking one of your best assets off the board.
Still, how a woman looks has NEVER been something I ever considered when it comes to dating her, but no guy can help which part of which girl grabs his attention. So I hope girls would at least consider how getting a tattoo on her body might just be like trying to spray paint a Ferrari... honey, you ain't gonna make it look better that way.
I know, I know... thats not why girls get tattoos; but I'm suggesting that maybe this is one aspect women SHOULD be considering... not because you owe it to your man, or anything... but instead because you might not have all the facts to weigh against your self expression. Because, in my opinion, most of you girls are probably a lot sexier than you think. So, please... consider.
... Simply the opinion of a man who adores women. Hope I contributed something.
00 Reply 2.2K opinions shared on Dating topic. I don't like tats on women's skin. So if she had large ones or in stupid places, I figure that we weren't a match. If she had something small, like on her ankle something, I wouldn't mind. Although I really can't understand why women want to get tats.
I think tats deface women's delicate skin. They detract from her appearance. It's like permanent graffiti.10 Reply- +1 y
I don't think so. I understand that she has a right to do what she wants with her body. But I personally just do not find tattoos on women attractive or appealing. For me, tattoos are something tobacco-spitting sailors wore! I think women are absolutely awesome just as they are. I wouldn't be interested in dating a walking mural!
00 Reply - +1 y
I don’t have a problem with tattoos on a women, but I do want to the reason for them! That sometimes speaks to the mindset of a woman! I. e. sons , husbands who have passed away. They’re tasteful, but I she not ready to move on. That’s just my opinion only!
00 Reply 2.2K opinions shared on Dating topic. Hell no!
Aside from disfiguring a woman, tattoos are a form of self harm that screams psychological problems.
I prefer women who are sane and who are not qualified to audition for the role of tattooed woman at a circus.13 Reply- +1 y
@cth96190 are you lost of the times too and you haven't realized that women are going to college and getting higher paid salaries than men and that is why men feel intimidated by women because they know they can't provide for us. I know a plenty of single women who are capable of living in their own. And women are volunteering for the military more rapid than it has before. What time period are you living in the 1950s?
- +1 y
@Tonita1996
I understand what creates and maintains a viable civilisation.
You, self evidently, do not have that understanding.
Women who have been to university have been indoctrinated in the Communist/Feminist mind fuck.
You exhibit evidence of that.
Men are not intimidated by such delusional women.
We see them as utterly unsuitable as potential partners, so most men avoid such women.
As for women in the military. You are talking to a former soldier (mechanised infantry).
Communist traitors and their useful idiots are pushing female enlistment, because they want to destroy the combat effectiveness of Western militaries.
Women are utterly unsuited to military service, at least anywhere near the pointy end.
Women who are sent into battle will be slaughtered and they will get the men around them killed.
I say form entire regiments of the parade ground suffragettes, so that they will be killed without taking any men with them. - +1 y
Commenting back on someone else's response that you had no business being into. So mind your own business.
Unless it was a tiny tattoo that covered done scar that she was really ashamed of I would probably pass onto another. I don't find tattoos nice - If I wanted to see a nice picture, I would go into a gallery.
00 Reply- +1 y
I definitely would. Do you have a bunch of tats? I'd love to see them if you're willing to share them
10 Reply 545 opinions shared on Dating topic. It depends. Some when it suits them. Others it doesn't. So I have to see it in order to decide for myself, unless it's a face tattoo then that's a no go for me.
00 Reply- +1 y
It depends how much she has and the placements.
I prefer none, but some small ones here and there aren't the worst thing.
10 Reply 969 opinions shared on Dating topic. Very unlikely. Tattoos are a pretty big turn-off.
10 Reply- +1 y
Nope
Cuz if am dating there r chances of getting physical.
And tattos r turn off gor me even for most guys i wanna admire n enjoy her simple clean skin not drawings over it lol00 Reply Tattoos are not a nice look on Women. I have always trying to pick women without them.
10 Reply1.6K opinions shared on Dating topic. No. I find it gross and trashy. To me, women with lots of tattoos look like bar whores.
10 ReplyProbably not unless our conversation really blew my mind
00 Reply- +1 y
I like art but just like everything it can be classy or trashy and I don't like trashy
00 Reply Everyone has different preference so you don't have to worry
00 Reply- +1 y
No too masculine. I don't like it. I do like small tattoos on them. Like a butterfly
10 Reply 441 opinions shared on Dating topic. I would and already my girlfriend got tattoo but not big though.
One on boobs one on ass and above pussy.
00 Reply- +1 y
Absolutely. I would love to see them. Personality would be the best though. I want to get one that will cost a lot.
00 Reply 7K opinions shared on Dating topic. I am not a big fan but i would date her. Maybe bad decisions would work in my favor.
00 ReplyI'm turned off by excessive tattoos. Tattoos, mean baggage for a relationship. And too much baggage can destroy the relationship.
00 ReplyI do not normally like a lot of ink, but I dated a girl who had both sleeves and several on her back and legs. It just worked on her.
00 Reply521 opinions shared on Dating topic. Sure, as long as it's not on the face. I think tattoos are actually attractive.
10 Reply- +1 y
I don't like tattoos but I wouldn't reject anyone purely for having some. They would just have to be really special to attract me in the 1st place.
00 Reply 5.2K opinions shared on Dating topic. Maybe - it would depend on what the tattoos were, where they were, and how trashy they were.
10 ReplyFuck no. Get your scribbly skin bag ass away from me 😂
10 Reply- +1 y
Depends on her personality. If she wears decent clothing, no problem with that!
00 Reply - +1 y
Depends where the tats are. Not a fan of face and neck tattoos.
10 Reply - 3 mo
Yes. I don't see anything wrong with it. And this is coming from me. A guy with no tattoos lol.
00 Reply - Show more from Guys (34)
Learn more
Most Helpful Opinions