What type of girl feels better to hold, cuddle, pick up and carry etc. do you prefer a tall bean stalk type build or would you prefer a more fit girl that is tight, toned, and slim? What feels better holding and hugging and touching
I prefer a lot of non-athletic builds.
I mean don't get me wrong, an athletic body looks awesome. Some girls it's like "Man, I could get my ass beat by her and would thank her for the experience."
But in terms of attraction overall, the range of body types I prefer tend to be rather unathletic. Except perhaps a distance runner. I think it's that if you're unathletic, you can look softer at lower weights.
I'm a bit of an oddball in many regards, though. I'm not much into big boobs. Big plump butts aren't really my thing.
But yes, this is including skinny girls and girls with a bit of extra weight. The thinner you are, the more it's about maintaining softness. The thicker you are, the more it's about maintaining firmness.
Besides obese, one of the body types I'm least attracted to is the "Jessica Rabbit" or "Kim Kardashian" body type. Again, not bad looking by any means, just doesn't turn me on.
I have perfect examples of what I'm talking about, but they are NSFW. Generally FloraRodgers on the thin side and TidecallerNami on the medium side.
But I suppose in terms of more appropriate imagery, Natalia Dyer kinda does the thin-bit-soft side, though she's still more on the firm side than the soft side. And then Emily Browning on the medium-thin side. She's kinda perfect though.
u When you talk about "fit" as opposed to skinny, I imagine that you are referring to a girl who is sometimes described as "curvy," which means a few extra pounds. Is that the comparison you are making?
I prefer slender, tender, fit and flexible, but not either skinny or athletic.
Measurements something like 5'2", 34", 24", 34" with a 28" underbust measurement, for example.
A girl who is soft all over, overflowing, bouncy, jiggly, cuddly, and squeezable, with even a bit of subcutaneous fat on her flat tummy. I love being able to pick her up and carry her.
I’ll take the tall beanstalk girl that isn’t getting any love here. I’ve had good luck talking to girls that other guys pass on as far as finding out they are usually awesome people and have a lot going for them in terms of personality and hobbies and an inner life that girls more concerned with social popularity and selling themselves usually don’t.
It really doesn't matter to me. I'm really into girls with 6 packs and a lot of muscle definition. But if she got a pretty face and a nice personality that matches with me, then I'm definitely giving it a try. But in general I would prefer one with a normal body.
No question... a fit girl id better, Having said that, every girl has their own strengths and weaknesses, and any girl can be attractive to the right guy.
fit is better
somewhat in between. not like super ripped but also not like completely weak. as long as she still looks nice, i wouldn't even really care if she was totally unathletic but it's rare that that looks good.
Both are amazing, fat girls are good for skinny boys, skinny girls for fat boys. Because, it's hard for a fat boy to have sex fat girl. Due to penis will not fully penetrate.
Skinny unathletic girl is a safer pick, most guys don't want a girl more fit than themselves.
I like short and sturdy girls. But pretty much anyone tiny is kind of my jam…
fit for me please! I wouldn't discriminate against a skinny or unathletic girl though...
You can also add your opinion below!
