Do you like the Harry Potter books or movies more?

[rainbowww]

[BCA6010]

The books were better, though it would be pretty difficult to make movie adaptations better than they were without each one being 3 hours long and/or split in two. Supposedly, they're remaking the original books in TV series format that is supposed to be more "book-accurate." I have serious doubts about any modern retelling of anything being of decent quality, however.

[OfDeath]

I don't really know because I haven't seen any of the movies except for a little bit of the first one.

I would've been right in the target audience for the first couple of books but they just weren't on my radar. By the time I heard about it, I was a bit too old and more interested in more mature themed literature. I had one friend who was into the books and he was a similar personality to me, so I would say it's possible I would probably enjoy the books more.

[jshm2]

Neither. That shit is whack. Or as my friend put it "Harry Potter is basically the dying hallucinations of a kid living under the stairs, suffering carbon monoxide poisoning."

Tolkien all the way, FTW!

[Lionman95]

I like the books more since they are more detailled and they involve parts the movies don´t show. I generally prefer books over movies since books encourage my creativity more.

[Astarlessnightsky]

books.

Movies are okay, but nothing beats the books.

[UniquelyBasic]

Haven't read the books. I watched some of the first movie but fell asleep halfway through lol

[DarkLegacy]

The books but the films were fantastic, but i always say books over films.

[AngryCarl2]

I like the movies. I don't care for the books.

[In_Trance]

never read/watched them

[vajeti9526]

Books! They are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay better.

[slatyb]

More than what?