when comics like marvel, in film black panther, after making the all white avengers with six "crackers" showing progress to include a lady, and in 2018 finally added a minority STAR in film,
and dc 2009 superman, in picture, to make a minority a hero, isn't that insulting other minorities, push one but hurt MORE minorities? because advanced any one minority is discrimination against other minority.

i mean even the name of "naacp" is advance colored people it advanced African pushing them into films, the film makers were scared to pick "whichever skilled one" due to this naacp, but excluding other minorities because we "advance colored people." nobody pushed latino chinese arab jew etc. into films and the jew just looks white anyhow.
about dc, the stretch is dreadful violating canon "only one survivor when krypton exploded" but this was also kryptonian. all for virtue signal but what about other minority?
in iron man 3 they added a hero but again advanced the naacp one, "notice i am inclusive" of just one minority?
but he was not the star, until black panther.
2, if my t shirt has superman, now they think i excluded the new one. and if i like the 2009 superman i excluded the white? and the minorities?
or i need to wear the black superman to prove i am not a racist? and frame my ticket that i watched black panther?
but if i prefer the black superman that is also racist against most minority and excluded white unless the t- shirt has both?
these virtue signals seek "praise for inclusion" of a minority, but isn't that insulting MORE minorities?
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions