Why is the style now, to hate whites, as we see imdb' admins pushed?

I was at website imdb' to see something and noticed the favoritism n partiality... when the truth was precisely the opposite!

The "featured" reviews, pushed by imdb' management admins, bashed a film with white light skin stars... featuring the review by the guy who admitted he only watched part... AND ALSO complained he only saw star Sylvester Stallone a short time... duh? Maybe he appears more in the part you didn't watch... but THAT review and another basher too, two bashers got "featured" because stallone is light skin... and scott too "2 white stars is bad"? but worse...

Those featured reviews had zero content complaints! Only "adjectives" that were false about the "film alarum" but that DID describe the 2 films PUSHED by imdb' admins in recommended "must watch" pushed films with black stars but truly those negative description, written about "alarum" falsely, but those applied to BOTH the TOP films pushed... pushed by admins "must watch" with pictures of blacks... like "vote for kamala harris because she isn't white"? Watch these empty films "because actors are not white"? Only Because a star has a huge afro that is the "large picture ad" selling point?

WHY is society TREND like that with agendas pushing both: bashing whites even in good stuff, while also films with blacks don't need nor get good writing? But get pushed anyway?

Why is the style now, to hate whites, as we see imdb' admins pushed?
Post Opinion