A) 0.55-0.6
B) 0.6-0.65
C) 0.65-0.7
D) 0.70-0.75
E) 0.75-0.80
F) 0.8
G) les than 0.55 or more than 0.8
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
It really depends on so many other things. It's not like I would judge a woman purely on this characteristic.
Personally I voted for F because I like a strong, fit woman with a feminine face, but in other cases of F women it may be different. But that one in the picture is just very nice muscle wise.. not skinny nor too extreme. Just who is she?
I asked people to vote the waist to hip ratio, not how fit they are...
Yeah.. but it's hard to focus on one particular thing when you present the whole picture. But that is what it is about in general anyway, the complete picture and not the details. It's not possible to separate it and remove stuff from the larger context (in this case, the body). It's like asking ''what haircut is nice? Please just ignore the face'' :)
Yeah, but this is like a survey... if i used a less fit woman would you have the same response? That's the problem. This is solely about WHR, not personal preference on muscle tone, body fat%, etc. You can say wether a haircut is nice or not without looking at the face. Saying if it suits the person is a different story.
Waist 26" & hips 36" has the same ratio as waist 42" & hips 58".
So I am not sure.
I have put only women who are slim in the pictures for a reason... it wouldn't be a fair comoarison otherwise. Anyway, even if they were all fat, a smaller one would be better as that would imply that they have less fat close to their vital organs.
I my opinion, all those ladies in the poll are genuinely blessed people. I would wait for the day when they are running a special and I can have all of them. 😋😋😋
I know, all of them are in great shape. However, i saw plenty of articles on waist to hip ratio which stated that men would prefer a specific, but I thought they weren't accurate because they didn't use less than 0.7 and they were using drawings, not real people. So I was curious what people actually prefer. I personally think under 0.7 looks best, but the rest are fine.
I agree with you. My point also was that when you fall for a girl, there are so many factors that exactly measurements and ratios don't matter. I always have the same response to questions about various measurements. As long as everything is in pleasant proportions, perfections don't matter
However, in light of your question, I agree. Theoretically, there ha
Please disregard the last line. Some kind of copy paste issue 😟
Thank you so much.
0.55 is impossible. Even your first option, Sierra Skye, has a WHR of 0.66. And anything below 0.65 is impossible without surgery or old fashioned corsets. Misleading people this much is very bad, they will not realize that those options are non-existent in nature. Even the famous perfect figure, 36-24-36, has a WHR of 0.66.
Her waist to hip ratio in most of her pictures is between 0.55 and 0.6. The measurements you take with the measuring tape is not an accurate calculus of your WHR. Maybe the last woman has a big butt and according to her measurements you may get a low WHR when she clearly has a straight waist line. Sierra has a 37 inch ass and 24 inch waist. Her waist to ass ratio may be 0.64, but her waist to hip ratio is between 0.55-0.6. Open photoshop and measure it.
And how do you do that?
Because the definide way of calculating WHR is to divide the circumference of your waist with the circumference of your hips. It is used as a health measuring system, something like BMI.
I have the exact waist and hip measurements as her, but mine looks more like 0.66 from the front... that's because she has wider hip bones than me. My ass looks perkier when viewed from the side though. You can have narrow hips and big buttocks , does that mean that you have a low WHR? No. You can also have wide hips and narrow waist, but a flat ass, but that doesn't mean you have a high WHR. Download a on screen ruler app on your phone then measure her hips and waist in her pictures.
Wide hips with narrow waist with or without a flat butt will give you a low WHR. And most women's butt (unless surgery) is proportional to every other body measurement...
Girl, hips is not the same as butt, make the difference. Waist to hip ratio is how small your waist looks compared to your hips, not how small your waist is to your butt. I can workout and get big glutes, but my waist and hips will be unaffected, so I'll have the same WHR even if my butt is bigger. I just told you my ass and waist are the same circumference as her's yet i look straighter due to different bone structure... when someone see you they'll judge based on how it looks, they'll not going to measure you with a tape. her waist to hip ratio is the one in the poll. Her waist to ass ratio is 0.64. I used numbers because i had to differentiate them somehow. I measured their WHR in those pictures and I can tell you i was very careful.
Okay girlie, you still don't get my point. I did never say that hips and butts are the same thing. And please open an Anatomy book, because by working out alone you won't drastically increase the size of your butt that it disturbs any results. Working on your glutes will mostly lift it and add firmness to it. Unless you do serious muscle gaining, which will affect your whole body PROPORTIONALLY.
You can make your ass bigger by exercise... maybe you should open an anatomy book... and a book about good manners... There are plenty of people that got a bigger butt with exercise. Glutes are muscles, and like any muscle they can grow...
This poll is about what frontal waist to hip ratio people prefer, not the body measurements of the models or the lateral waist to hip/ass measurement. You can totally have a frontal WHR between 0.55-0.6, Sierra is proof to that.
No, anything under 0.65 is not impossible without surgery or corsets 😂 I'm 18, 65kgs/143lbs, 1.65m/5'5" with a 24" waist and 41" hips (ratio: 0.59). Many of the girls and women in my family have a WHR between 0.65-0.60. It's about genetics really. I don't even work out more than 2 fumed per week. A good example is Beyonce who has a natural WHR of 0.65.
Woman in "D" has a photoshop fail on her arm. Do not fall for them.
Where?
Opinion
30Opinion
I think the first two is whats hot these days.
I would like to remind you that these things change over the years. Prefered body type has to do with fashion. We see something too much and start liking it eventually (its a marketing trick) So dont worry yourself around your body as long as you feel and are HEALTHY you would look glowing to me.
For example I like Rihannas bodytype right now. She has been slimmer and fitter but I think she feels better with the weight she has and she has the confidence of a queen. :) lots of love
There are somthings instinctual that lurks in our biological imprints that dont need to be taught... like one is a fear of spiders and snakes, and another is walking up to a mountain ledge and feeling fear of falling... hip to waste ratio is one of those things for a man and so far the survey does not deny.. that the closer to 0.55 the ratio is the healthier she is perceived to bear children...
Males dont select females in general on any other marker except for health to bear children.. a lot of other markers are associated with this.. clean skin, attractiveness, fitness, athletic.. everything else is a plus.. this is a mere scientific fact wether we like or not.. kind of like the inconvenient truth that women will select upon a dominance hierarchy of men to compete for resources... aka.. money and power.
A waist to hip ratio of 0.65 to 0.70 looks very good. My waist is something like that. My body has a waist of 24 inches and hips of 36 inches. So my waist to hip ratio is 0.67
Your ratio is just the same as mine. What are your measurements?
Who the fuck cares? Who the fuck is sad enough to think about numbers really? 😂
I didn't know this was a thing and that people actually care about this. It's just as stupid as caring about thigh gaps and hip dips.
Whatever comes to me wanting it is the waist to hip ratio I prefer.
all the above look fine to me but then im more attracted to thigh gaps than hips
Do you mean that triangle that forms due to wide hips or the gap that forms due to having skinny legs?
Women no matter their waist to hip ratio are fabulous! We should not be judging them.
I would 0.7 plus - I not too sure about the lower ratios, the hips seem a bit out of proportion to me
I'm 0.07 which I hear is average, so that's my pick.
This depends on the individual. For example F is basically straight up and down but she is fit and beautiful.
I chose D.
I guess D would be the average for slim women
The ideal was always 0.7
The first one is almost unrealistic and her waist ratio is 0.65 in reality.
I measured it... from the front that's how it looks. Her body measurements is another story. I have the same waist and hip measurement as her and mine looks 0.66 from the front. You can have the same body measurements as someone and look different due to different bone structure
It's misleading then. A real <0.6 would be even smaller.
She is Sierra Skye, she looks the same in the rest of her picture and videos. So she looks like that in real life. My point was that waist to hip ratio is what it looks like from the front, not what you got when you measured yourself with a tailor's tape. The last one may look straight from the front, yet she may have a big butt. In that case, If you'd take her measurements with a tape you'd get a low WHR, when she clearly doesn't have a low oshe I don't think Sierra is misleading, she has good genes. 0.7 is not the ideal. in those studies they modified the WHR by making the hips wider, which made lower WHR look fat, that's why 0.7 was prefered. When they made the waist smaller 0.6 was prefered...
I am not into pencils. I am not into light bulbs. The range of ''C'' to ''D'' can be discussed.
A B or C. I'd say A is the hottest overall girl here, though there's more to it than just waist to hips. D E and F are all way too big in the midsection.
Wow come on @AbdKilani
I know you love women tits and hips lol
@AbdKilani yupe kfmf
@AbdKilani what's your favorite
@AbdKilani lol
I shall refer you to my philosophical inspiration when it comes to the female form: Sir Mix-A-Lot.
Doesn't matter much, as long as she looks good ;) Not too big, nor too small a ratio :)
0.55-0.6 <3
women that are 0.8 are YUCK
I prefer she have 2 hips and 1 waist.
First girl looks... odd... id say b or c
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions