Should we ban under 16 girls wearing skirts and bikinis?

[Manuel2]

I noticed that some schools in England and Europe has made school uniform unisex and banned skirts.
I have noticed that some people have banned their girl children wearing bikinis with padded bras.
AT LAST COMMON SENSE HAS ARRIVED

Why people want to see their children, particularly girls and teenage girls over serialised. Time to keep kids as kids as kids, I say. Help to prevent teen pregnancies and abuse.
The schools that are starting to fight for liberating girls and young women from sex objects to decent human beings.

Let's hope all people follow the examples of the few.

Updates

+1 y

Let us take this a stage futher. If a girl under 16 and going to school. Should be banned wearing a wrong colour bra with their uniform. Example, wearing black bras under their white shirts.
Also should we fine the parents alloing their daughter to dress that way?

Updates

+1 y

Women-I should let you know that it looks more and more that the school uniform skirt is being out dated, maybe due to the metoo movement.
Men-you will have to wait for when they are on holiday to see the school girls in skirts, or should we take it further and ban children wearing skirts all togett.
But some girls have women bodies, or who can police them

Updates

+1 y

As it is Summer and I notice that school girls are now wearing mini skirts to school. No tights and see through shorts. Wrong?

Updates

+1 y

Still a talking point now

[Anonymous]

Dunno- should we ban them from wearing bras and panties? Bunches of pervs and SJW neo-puritans consider any lingerie to be 'sexually objectifying', after all- that's why they announced that they're cancelling Victoria's Secret Fashion Shows from now on today. Does that mean that children, particularly girls and teenage girls, should be prohibited from wearing any underwear at all? Seeing as how they're 'sexy' and all. Oh, and school uniforms! Especially girls' school uniforms- you wouldn't believe how commonplace that fetish is, how much they're sexualized. So then, why don't we ban these 'girl children' from wearing any clothing at all to school? Time to keep kids as kids as kids, I say. And since any and all items of clothing that they wear are gonna be 'sexualized' and 'sexually objectifying', on account of the teenage schoolgirls wearing them, why don't we go ahead and ban 'em all? "Let's hope all people follow the examples of the few", and "fight for liberating girls and young women from sex objects to decent human beings", by stripping them of their freedom to wear any items of clothing at all! Wouldn't that be liberating, forcibly implementing a nudist dress code?

[Manuel2]

The boys and girls are wearing the same uniform.
Only the underwear might be different.

[Insomnia72]

Well in Amazon tribes, girls walking around naked is the norm and they don't get sexually assaulted by adults. So I think it's a matter of perception. It think because in european and muslim cultures, women were expected to wear clothes so as to hide their parts men were tempted to see, it became the norm. So if a female was suddenly exposing much of herself, it triggered "uncontrollable" sexual urges in men to assault her, thus blame her for the attack.

Adam and Eve were naked. Animals are naked. So I think it comes down to attitude and perception. Just respect females. That's how I see it.

[Daniela1982]

When I was in high school I was on the Girl's League. We were a student governing body that made sure the dress code was enforced. I don't think it hurt us in any way nor did any girls have a problem with being called aside to tell them their skirts were too short as I'm sure they knew. I was at the Huntington Beach Pier one day in California and you could see a ton of young girls wearing scanty thongs from atop the pier. They gathered around the pier so everyone could look down at their skimpy suits. I'm sure girls who wear short skirts and skimpy suits seem to have an affinity to wanting to be noticed. The problem is that over 1 million teen girls at age 17 or under get pregnant every year. I think if you are over 18 you can wear what you want but as long as you are still in high school you should think less on sex and more with your SAT scores and getting into college.

[AlienParasite]

I see ok that if a school has a uniform to make it unisex. That way the uniform follows its function, to make everyone look as equal as possible.

However if there's no uniform or in private life I think girls should wear whatever they want. I wore skirts and dresses all my life and never felt my security threatened because of it. I wore skirts when I was 3 and I wore skirts when I was 12... if anyone ever seen something sexual in me wearing a skirt at any of those ages that person has a problem. Besides, they would probably still see something sexual in me even if I wasn't wearing a skirt... because at the end of the day the skirt is just a excuse, the pedophile is going to like the little pretty girl whether she wears a skirt or not.

[lucian_lucian_123]

The problem that teenager girls are walking in panties are first of all a problem for their male colleges. You know boys and guys are high visually sensitive from the sexual point of view by their nature. So, my point of view is if you want to walk in panties make a school just for the girls, and don't sexually assault the boys. But I'm pretty sure if will be a school just for the girls, the girls will not walk in panties, because the main target of the sexual visual assault are the boys. Still the boys are wearing normal clothes, but the girls are offended to wear normal clothes as boys, you know, they have special rights, to show the panties to their male colleges.

[Anonymous]

That's stupid, to be honest. I don't want other people to dictate what I can or cannot wear, no matter what age I am.

What we should do, is teach how to actually treat other people. Why not try to do something about the people who abuse these young women, rape them and whatnot?
Teach teenagers about the importance of protection and safe sex.
EDUCATE.

[Manuel2]

When you witness a child being raped, and the criminal used the fact she was wearing a skirt.
So what is more important to you. A - Child safety B- Child Abusing

[Opinion Owner]

Come on, that's just a bad excuse to take the blame on the child.
If you cover everybody up, that doesn't eliminate the problem with the fact there are rapists, pedophiles and other bad people out there.

Don't blame the victims. The criminals know what they're doing is wrong and they won't stop doing it just because some won't wear a certain piece of clothing.

[Manuel2]

You are blaming the victim, Like many people in Europe, believe like me, temptation needs to be dealt with.
When you first had sex, did you wear a school uniform, or dressed to make yourself look older. Make up perfume and so on.
Buut what if you was 8 years old, and went to school an innocent, come home a victim.
Are you a woman or a child molester protector?
I know what side I am on.

[Opinion Owner]

How am I blaming the victims? I'm curious to know. You basically say it's their fault for being raped and that the problem will be solved just by eliminating some clothes.
If that's the case, there wouldn't be rape in countries where women cover themselves up completely.

You're seeing the problem in these innocent girls, but the problem is the molesters' mindset.

[Manuel2]

That is the point the schools and I are making.
So far there plan is working better than the old system

[ShortCircuit]

I don't think public schools have any business enforcing dress codes that differ from whatever the nudity and public decency laws are in the area.

Private schools, on the other hand, could require all students to wear burkas or banana costumes for all I care, because nobody is being forced to send their kids there and pay their tuition.

[Porcelaine]

I like that idea but I also know teenagers will find a way to act out. I think they have enough rules on their puny heads, and adults are the ones who need to be punished harder for taking advantage of teenagers even if they are consenting, they are still just naive kids.

[VeggiePizzaDude]

I agree that uniforms should be unisex, but it would be much more effective if we made skirts the universal garb if students. I've always felt that a skirt is more freeing to the lower body and allows for efficient airflow. Lots of teenage boys complain that they don't get enough sex; well, these same boys can just wear a revealing skirt around women and wait to be raped. Everybody wins!

[Cactusqueen]

I’m not understanding how others sexually looking at young girls is their fault? That seems like a problem we’d look at the source for.

[Manuel2]

Totally agree

[lucian_lucian_123]

Young lady, the problem that teenager girls are walking in panties are first of all a problem for their male colleges. You know boys and guys are high visually sensitive from the sexual point of view by their nature. So, my point of view is if you want to walk in panties make a school just for the girls, and don't sexually assault the boys. But I'm pretty sure if will be a school just for the girls, the girls will not walk in panties, because the main target of the sexual visual assault are the boys. Still the boys are wearing normal clothes, but the girls are offended to wear normal clothes as boys, you know, they have special rights, to show the panties to their male colleges.

[Cactusqueen]

@lucian_lucian_123 children aren’t trying to turn on other children. THAT is the creepy thing that weirds me out how don’t understand that. I mean it’s just a gross way to think. When girls are together away from boys they don’t dress differently because again their clothing doesn’t have the goal of give a boy an erection lol To pretend young boys aren’t very easily stimulated regardless of others dress is laughable. I don’t see any issues with giving schools uniforms for students to wear. Obviously not outlawing bras lol But to dictate what they do outside of school can and will snowball out of control. We all think our version of morals and standards is the right one, so once we start letting people pick and choose FOR us we enter dangerous territory.

[lucian_lucian_123]

Lady, from 10 to 18 years old the boys are teenagers and I assure you are pretty aware of the girls panties. Why for men do exist rules, they are not coming with their penis at sight, while for girls not? What is the problem is girls are coming in school with pants, just for the sake of their male colleges? outside school they can do whatever they want and their parent want. You know, the democracy means your rights are stretching until you are disturbing somebody else.

[Cactusqueen]

@lucian_lucian_123 The problem AGAIN is finding the line between people not liking something and actually needing a change. Lol nobody’s genitals are visible in school and a skirt isn’t see through to show panties

[lucian_lucian_123]

If the children are not intending to turn on other children, how exactly we have a lot of pregnant teenagers? You know skirts, and mainly short skirts are creating a lot of problems. First of all skirts are coming from very times when didn't exist short skirts, any skirt was up to the ankle. They perpetuated until today as a woman specific fashion, while never was a women specific fashion. In the past men were also wearing skirts. Women moved later to pants. Rarely a woman will dress a long skirt today, and the most used are the short and very short skirts. Meanwhile more and more women are dressing with pants. Nowadays we have women mostly in pants, why we can't have the same rules in schools for both boys and girls? The school is not a place where to walk your sexuality, you are going there for something else, the uniform or the clothing should not be too sexy.

[lucian_lucian_123]

And also, I'm not interested if the girls are going naked to meet other girls, but when they meet boys is a problem. You know, they are of different sex, and can appear all kind of things: sexual assault, temptation, feelings etc

[Cactusqueen]

@lucian_lucian_123 we can but what you seem to ignore or actually don’t see is that wearing pants will not suddenly make girls seem non sexual beings in the eyes of boys. I don’t picture dress code being loose fitting baggy trousers. But fitted for the body shape and size. Meaning instead of long legs being exposed a girls bum will now be heightened in view. Which brings me back around to my point that girls shouldn’t have to change their average clothes because others don’t know how to act with their feelings. People are going to have to start taking responsibility for themselves instead of treating girls bodies as a problem

[lucian_lucian_123]

Do exist common sense and I think everybody can understand what means to not dress sexually provocative. In case you don't know, there are lot of places on earth (still USA or Europe) where you cannot enter dressed however you want. So I think you got it that the school is not a place to look sexy and show the sex side. There are also the teachers to face this look. And yes, young lady, showing too much the sexual side is sexual assault. The same way how exist verbal sexual assault, physical sexual assault, also exist the visual sexual assault. And the most damaged part in this are the men, because men never dress sexually, but women do this all the time. Otherwise I propose the boys to come at school with molded pants and show their penis, because they like it and because is their right and dress however they want. Is you problem if you, woman teacher or girls are looking sexually to boys. Take care, exist laws. I’m not understanding how others sexually looking at young boys is their fault? That seems like a problem we’d look at the source for.

[Cactusqueen]

@lucian_lucian_123 LoL you seriously ignited what I said and used my valid argument! I swear you have me dying laughing 😂😂😂 I’m gonna go ahead and understand you aren’t interested in learning so you go on and keep spreading your nonsense. I promise not interject with any knowledge again. Feel free to write more ignorance but know I won’t be reading it. Stay safe out there 😇

[Cactusqueen]

Ignored*

[Guffrus]

Humans right?

Humans are the problem so we should?

Kill? All the humans?

[Cactusqueen]

@Guffrus if that’s the only suggestion you could come up with it really does show the deep rooted issues we have. Thanks for an example.

[Guffrus]

Meow!

[bamesjond0069]

Why no skirts and padded bikinis? This is stupid. Skirts are not sexual. Pants are. You ever see a girl in pants and you can see her ass if its big or shapely or not. Skirts hide her figure. Also padding in bikini tops keeps nipples from poking through. Smh. Nothing you say makes sense.

[chaeyoungswife]

The reason is that guys are sexualizing the girls, and in that case if they go to the school the guys should be the ones being punished. Someone needs to start teaching young boys about respect, if that happened there wouldn't be as many of those perverted old men out there.

[lucian_lucian_123]

punished for what?

[chaeyoungswife]

Punished for being pervs.

[Anonymous]

I think this ban is only looking good from person your age point of view only.

As women looking not as good, school teachers,... getting jealous.

Rest of perverts need to be locked up and have no access to to any girl or boy ever.

Why some old fart or craizy cat lady should be allowed to dictate what girl 4 or more times younger are allowed to wear it is not Muslim country,...

I have no interaction with that age group in my life and not really want to...

[Opinion Owner]

If this colour difference is against dress code in your school book, then girl need to see consequences of her actions.

At this age everyone trying to prove that they are worst person and breaking the rooles, becouse it will make them look cool in front of classmates.

Just let me tell you one little think after you finish school, most likely you will never see most of them anyway, but silly habits will stay...

Just follow the roles, they are there for reason and not to break them, unless you want to end up in prison.

Or on the other hand, if girl does that for attention seeking purpose, it will not end well to, this path leed to teenage pregnancy and dropout drop out from school and end up in burger flipping place forever.

Just stick to roles.

[ChrisMaster69]

Seriously,
no the likes of you keep things living in the dark age.
people can within limits wear what they want.

Can you also look at improving your piss poor grammar.

[1truekhaleesi]

Better sex education will keep teen pregnancy down. Whoever gets turned on by teenagers has issues, it's not the teenagers fault.

[Exorcist_Rampage]

No. People should be allowed to wear it and it gives the girls confidence. It's not an issue. It's not like men will rape her for it anyways. If men would rape, they'd rape regardless how she is dressed.

[Manuel2]

The school has noticed sexual assault is gone overnight. Plus child safety has risen.
If you have a girl child, is it better to deal with the problem than finding a cure?

[deedaysun]

Why? Clothes are clothes... why pick them out and tell them that.. let them. be what they are... live their teen lives... they have enough burden already of academics

[AnnonEMouse]

Now that's stupid. If you are turned on by what a young girl is wearing, it is you who has the problem, not her.

[Budvizer]

No, skirts are feminine and there is nothing wrong with that. Women should not be banned to wear clothing that was purposely designed for them. That's just nonsense. If a girl wants to act or dress like a girl that is just natural.

[Gespenster_division]

[R_Cakes91]

Only because there are way too many disgusting old dudes out there who will take advantage of it

[Gedaria]

No problem with the skirts , it's the shortness. Young girls roll up the waist band shortening the length. Even trousers they seem to wear a smaller size to show off the body...

[Gedaria]

I don't agree that young girls should wear short skirts to school. What's wrong with trousers. As for bra a pants no not really important.

[NorthwestRider]

Typical an old man mostly likely a religious one is telling girls what they can wear and what they can't wear

[Manuel2]

You sound like the young man that finds children in skirts and padded bras a turn on.
I am not as old as you think.
Plus I have witnessed a child being raped.
OK!

[NorthwestRider]

Lol really, just look at Roy Moore and how he loves young girls or those creepy pastors who love raping kids

Neither are young men

[Manuel2]

It has nothing to do with age or religious beliefs, but I hope you never see a child being raped. Trust me, you will see life in another way.

[leahzrc]

No but they shouldn't sell slutty clothes to children

[Harmseygrace]

Skirts are okay as long as they're knee length. I don't think you should expose yourself too much.

[red_knight]

Sure absolutely, why don't you ban teeshirts and shorts for us guys too while your at it...

Instead of ban why not reason as nd persuade people?

[StickyFingaz]

Oh snap someone is getting hard on looking at underage girls. Cops are on their way. Bubba and Jamal will keep a cell warm for u

[Manuel2]

I have put preverts away. This is for prevention not your problem

[CuriousMufuxka]

I disagree. Taking away freedoms will only inspire rebellious teens.

[Anonymous]

If they can legally fuck and get married in most places I'm pretty sure they can wear a skirt...

[Opinion Owner]

Why would they be looking at their bras? Also a black bra goes with anything.

[Anonymous]

No, how would you like it if people banned one of your favorite articles of clothing, just because it made you feel good. Let women be. You sound like a damn nazi

[just_a_potato]

I like skirts though?

[Curabyron]

Yay i won't be the only girl wearing shorts

[Curabyron]

but it's kinda weird how someone would sexualise a childs uniform and either way regardless of what you wear people will sexualise you, for example I wear a large school top and yet people have managed to sexualise my breasts despite my large top... also wouldn't implementing dress codes mean you are seen as an object. Also why tf would you notice see through shorts if you're trying to not sexualise young girls. It's only how you chose to perceive it and judging from your opinion it seems that you still see it in a sexual way. Regardless of what you wear you will be sexualised by someone and it's not the outfit that causes sexual abuse.

[Thatsamazing]

Yawn. Dumb post is dumb.

[Manuel2]

I sadly saw a little girl raped by her babysitter.
He got away with it.
The reason it is boring, as dealing with the aftermath is far from boring.

Plus as you are judging me by your standards, and whatever you was taking at the time

[Thatsamazing]

Are you okay?

[Manuel2]

I am and sadly the victim is not

[Manuel2]

The monster is still free to offend again, but to prevent any copy cats, chsnge dress code

[Thatsamazing]

... Okay. You have no idea what you're talking about. Great.

[Manuel2]

I know more than you can understand. Sadly.

[Thatsamazing]

Lol of course you do, champ.

[Anonymous]

Whoever gets turned on by preteen legs is a loser.

[Manuel2]

I agree but some people will not stop there. So some schools have bought in the rule change and I agree

[Anonymous]

Lol

Problem solved.

[Opinion Owner]

Of course the hottest girl in the school when i was in secondary always wore trousers, omfg that ass..

wouldn't have seen that like i did if she had been wearing a skirt..

[MoscowMitch]

No! Stop objectivizing children.

[Anonymous]

Worry about your own businesses.