In your opinion, should leggings be worn as pants or should there always be a skirt or long shirt to cover the butt?

[Brown_mommi85]

Cover the butt

Don’t cover the butt

[CubsterShura]

Cover the butt and legs, duh. If your purpose for wearing them as pants is comfort then there are plenty of good comfortable options out there that don't show everything. And if you want to wear it to actually show the butt and legs there are better kinds of them that hug your curves in all the right places without looking so frumpy.

I don't see myself wearing them at all except if I'm wearing it underneath something else for WARMTH or if I'm working out in a private space. If I'm working out around men in the gym I wear loose trousers.

[Randomawkwardness]

I used to be one of those girls whose wardrobe consisted of leggings and hoodies. None covered my butt and looking back, if they had, it probably would've saved me quite a few inappropriate remarks by my classmates. I think people can wear whatever they want but should be prepared for the consequences.

[LesterJester]

It was a great time back when yoga pants went full swing into fashion before the shirts caught up with the trend.

Now all the ladies walk around with shirts purposely extended in the back to cover the butt.

I mean, what's the point now? There's nothing to look at any more.

[Kurαȷ]

Leggings should be worn as pants and have always been worn as pants.

Problems arise when people start thinking that gym *tights* and yoga pants are like the other leggings.
Those are clearly not outerwear, so don't wear them outside, people.

[emmily2396]

Depends. Some legging are good quality and are just like skinny jeans. Others are see through or not squatproof.

[Femdomina]

Leggings are in fact a type of light pants (unlike tights which are similar to stockings).
The definition of leggings in USA: "Tight-fitting stretch pants worn by women and children".
The definition of leggings in UK: “Tight-fitting trousers made of a stretch fabric".
Leggings are thicker, footless, and can be worn like pants.
Tights, nylons, fishnets and pantyhose are collectively called hosiery (just like socks - nobody wears them as pants or instead of pants).
The differences are obvious:
https://bestleggingsdaily.com/tights-vs-leggings-difference-explained/
https://www.diffen.com/difference/Leggings_vs_Tights
https://www.bebeautiful.in/fashion/trends/do-you-know-the-difference-between-leggings-and-tights

[wmasters]

In my opinion, she should cover her butt if she wants to exhibit the standardized classy look. If she wants her appearance to be more revealing, then showing her butt will help with that. I'd be more attracted to her covering it because it gives me the impression that there's depth to her. That she doesn't prioritize on sexual provocation to feel attractive. Common sense tells me that if you attract using sex, that's what you'll most likely get. A partner who's been attracted to you by sex. Which will likely produce a straight forward outcome. A relationship built on sex, until the sex dies. Now a woman who attracts in more marvelous ways, will certainly attract me, because she'd likely possess characteristics i'm more attracted to. So, yea, my ideal woman would cover her butt because she feels it ain't important for everyone else to see it.

[xKaytie]

I think this is mostly an issue in america.
(not an insult just me thinking out loud and wondering if there's a difference between leggings here in the uk and in america)

I voted no, because i've always worn leggings as trousers on their own from a young age and continue to see young girls and adults wearing them. I do see some girls and i think "Gosh get some thicker leggings!" and it does worry me as some of these girls are very young and you can see their underwear.

It all depends, some leggings can be nice and thick whereas cheaper ones you can see right through. I definitely do think that parents with younger children should be more cautious though.

[Anon_loser]

Depends what type. Athletic leggings (like from gym shark or Lululemon) are meant to be worn as pants. Like whoever puts a skirt over that is stupid.

If it’s a thin material meant for dresses or skirts, then they should be worn with a dress or skirt

Duh

[MissKittyz]

They should be worn however you want. I think they look good both ways tbh. I mostly wear leggings as pants cause they are super comfortable, fit my body shape and look good with any shirt.

I just don't wear the very see-through ones. I wear good quality ones that don't show my actual skin through them.

If leggings are showing your underwear perfectly (not just the shape) then you better wear better quality leggings cause those are cheap looking lol

[JackSmy]

I leave it all up to her, to decide her comfort level, and maybe how horny she is!
If she's showing it off, I will look, and smile, because nature made it that way!! Gods bless the person that invented spandex, and then Stirrup pants, then leggings and Yoga pants!
I would smile, and say hello to both of the ones in the pictures you posted. Different looks, and very sexy, in different ways!

[xXSaturnXx]

Hmm... I normally wear leggings as pants but sometimes I'll wear a skirt over the top of them, funny enough that's the only way I can wear a skirt without feeling vulnerable. I never got used to it, my school let girls wear trousers which tbh made winter a bit more tolerable :P

[DeeDeeDeVour]

Either way...
I can wear 'em like this

. or like this

[aWes0MeNeSs]

To me, it depends on the leggings. If they're thin or see-through, I think they should be worn with shorts or a skirt, but otherwise I think they're fine as pants.

[Jjpayne]

Honestly as a guy I love girls in leggings as pants it's very attactive but that being said, I agree that leggings as pants should be saved for home or the gym outside in public otherwise, a dress, long shirt, or skirt to cover the butt is probably the best option

[ForteExe]

Ladies wear leggings to guard against upskirt shots or wardrobe malfunctions. Whores wear them as pants because they know guys will stare at their asses to spot their panties through the fabric.

@Brown_mommi85 I don't think girls should wear them as pants because I don't think girls should be whores, but if you're a whore I'd rather know it from a glance than find out later. So if you're a whore then go ahead and wear them.

[duanemc86]

☝️A queers answer right there.

[ForteExe]

Asshole

[duanemc86]

🤷‍♂️😂😂😂

[markscott]

Leggings can be worn either way, with or without a shirt covering the butt. They look good with each. And it gives women a good looking option.

[vivmatt]

All I'll say is, if you can see through the leggings to the undies, they're basically stockings at that point. Stockings AREN'T PANTS.

[NeoWraythe]

That is the correct way to view it.

[GinnyD]

This is my pet peeve! When did it become acceptable for all and any 'out-of-shape women to wear their yoga/athletic attire everywhere w/o covering their 'very unattractive butts'! Do they not look at their behinds in the mirror? Jiggly, overweight butts in almost see through tights, are NOT attractive and they should not wear these articles of clothing in public w/o some type of covering. Period!

[InfobotsMom]

Cover the butt and camel toe unless you like eyes glued to your parts like flies on poop.

[Anonymous]

I'm not going to complain about the view...

In my opinion it should be covered, leave something for imagination...

Big NO, for those + size ladies, wearing it and not covering anything, 'my eyes'...

She can wear whatever the f**k she wants it is not Muslim country, she even can walk naked I will not complain...

[Lehlani]

It can be use both ways but I prefer it without a skirt

[Shiver]

I like the look of both, but I guess not covering the butt would have my vote.

[Oram52]

Trust that ass definitely looks fine in leggings, I've definitely noticed that. There is no need to cover up with leggings instead wear better stylish leggings. Don't wear anything that looks like PJs.