I find them ugly and immature especially on those two guys up there. I like seeing skin, not scribbles, and what would seem like a rash from afar. These people who have tattoos aren't even what you consider "tough". The only guys who are the exception are bikers, "tough people", criminals, military. They even look more pathetic on rappers and celebrities, their toughness is zero! And for women, prostitutes since that's been historically the case. I don't care if you need one to remember someone's name, seriously? What are you five? And oh, it's a way to express myself, like since everyone has a tattoo nowadays, that becomes a fallacy. It's like you want to be different wearing a red shirt but everyone else is wearing one so you don't stand out. People just want to be edgy and it's a teenage mentality. What happens when your skin starts sagging and you have all these ugly markings?
Sure, don't these look lovely that you will be wearing til you die. Wonder if they will scare the grand children - Grandma looks like one of my comic books momma.
I don't like them. I am fine with tiny ones, but if he is covered in them no thanks. If he used them to cover scars that is ok though
2
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
I'm former military. We've all got a unit tattoo. It has meaning. Just as how some members got names of colleagues who died or fights tattooed on them. It all has meaning.
So many people get tattoos cause they can. These tattoos are meaningless. Irrelevant. Stupid & pathetic. A desperate attempt to be different, but ironically a number of tattoos like tigers, skulls, etc., are repeated over & over again, cause they've nothing else going for them. And in years to come just an ugly smudged mark on the skin that they likely can't remember why they even got it.
So no tattoos in general are not attractive. If they've a reason that's different. Getting your ex's name tattooed on you or your child's name as some do & try to whine it has meaning just means they're so stupid they can't remember what these people are called.
Depends. Some are pretty some ain't. Also depends what it is and where. I think it's also easier to accept them when you love the guy. I usually don't like it but my boyfriend has and I like them cause I like him. If he didn't have it and asked if he should get it I'd say no... hope that makes sense but I don't know 4sho
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(18-24)
+1 y
Depends on the person and the type of tattoos and how many someone has. I thought Justin bieber his tattoos looked nice around 2015, he had one sleeve, a few on his other arm and a few on his chest. But at he moment I do not like his tattoos anymore, they became too much for my taste.
3
1 Reply
Opinion Owner
+1 y
On this guy in the pictures I like the tattoos. I just don't love the big "god knows my struggles" on the chest. It looks odd with the others. The ones around his neck are detailed and dense and the thing on the chest is really plain and chunky.
For me it depends. So here's my thing I like nerds type of guys and when I see a nerd who when he takes off his shirt has tattoos I'm like damn that's hot. I like the surprise of thinking he's clean cutno tats but I also like guys with no tattoos at all so it works out either way. If you can hide your tattoo enough that I wouldn't even suspect the is one that's hot. But full body and facial hands feet and legs not for me personally to date but maybe befriend
I'm neutral about tattoos in the sense that I've never found someone attractive or unattractive because they got a tattoo. I would find someone unattractive if their tattoo is stupid or offensive though.
