If you were saying " why does a child wear fishnet stockings and stripper heels?" You'd have a point.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
Babies WTF? Why would a baby need leggings? 🤦♂️
Its just what they sell for baby pants. Most babies aren't wearing jeans
Because they’re pants? Leggings were never designed to be sexual or whatever. They are literally just pants and there’s nothing wrong with them.
@AmourHoney yess exactly!
@Apple1996 I have no idea where the idea that leggings are sexual even came from 😳
@AmourHoney Its causes they're tight and sometimes see through so i guess its that
@AmourHoney... but they are sexual? If you're seriously telling me they're not you're delusional.
@Apple1996 probably, kinda sad that tight clothing automatically means sexual
Ladies put yourselves in a guy's shoes for just a minute.
no they’re not sexual, there’s a reason tiny babies also wear them... because they are not sexual. what about them is even sexual? the fact that they’re tight? in that case does that mean children should no longer be allowed to wear tights? nah you’re delusional for sexualising a pair of pants bruh
How about you put yourself in a ladies shoes for a minute when children can’t even wear LEGGINGS without a guy saying it’s sexual. Honestly it’s so disgusting that you could see a little kid wearing leggings as sexual.
Should we also stop children from wearing thermal pajamas in case men also find those sexual? What about skinny jeans? Should children be stopped from wearing them as well because men find them sexual? No, it’s not one else’s problem but you’re own if you’re looking at a small child and thinking what they’re wearing is sexual just because it’s tight clothing.
What about these? You’re gonna look at a child wearing these and say it’s wrong because they’re tight? www2.hm.com/en_gb/productpage.0514031001.html
What’s the difference between a child wearing shorts and leggings? Leggings cover more than shorts do yet you still consider them an issue? Makes absolutely no sense whatsoever
@AmourHoney yes, because they're tight obviously. If you can see a female's whole figure in what she's wearing it's sexual. You can say over and over again that it's not, but it doesn't change the fact that it is sexual. There is nothing appropriate about a child in leggings.
No, there nothing appropriate about you looking at a child in leggings and seeing something sexual. You need to get yourself checked because that is fucked up. There will never be anything sexual about a child wearing leggings. You can say it over and over again but it just tells me a lot about you. You’re gross as fuck.
Even women in leggings isn’t sexual, they are pants. They cover everything, just because you can see the shape of her legs doesn’t make them sexual you weirdo.
@AmourHoney you're ridiculous. Your logic is flawed in so many ways. I'm the bad guy cuz I don't want to see children in tight clothing? 🤣 Ok.
Your logic is flawed for thinking that babies in leggings is sexual, sort yourself out
I’m not gonna continue wasting energy on this but I will leave you with article to help with your problem because your logic is extremely toxic and not a normal one www.motherhoodandmore.com/.../
@AmourHoney that article didn't even address the topic at hand. I have no issue with females in general wearing leggings, we're talking about CHILDREN. And for the record, no, it doesn't make me disgusting for noticing what someone is wearing child or not.
If anyone is sexualising a child in leggings then that is their problem because there is absolutely nothing sexual, slutty or even adult like about leggings. They are pants designed to be more comfortable than wearing jeans and shit. Anyone who thinks otherwise is weird.
Not to be rude mate but if you can look at a baby girl wearing leggings and see something sexual then you need to be behind bars
Hmmm. Ok mate 🤣
it’s true idkk why you’re laughing but ok 😂
I'm laughing at you trying to portray me a pedo. Yoga pants are sexual, whether you want to admit or not.
nah you’re just a nonce
Sure thing mate