Would you call Scarlett Johansson a “conventional beauty”?

[Anonymous]

[hahahmm]

No. She has a dog face but... if a guy is only looking for fun/or to be excited by looking at a woman and she has a nice body he can forget/ignore the face. There's different degrees to it. Some guys NEVER notice a face ever. Other guys focus a lot on the face. And still others are in-between.

When I was growing up and in my 20s, a face like hers would have NEVER been considered beautiful in any way. Would have never seen it in a movie, tv show or on a magazine cover unless she was playing the fugly side kick in a Cinderella story.

[Adivabbaby]

Wait what?

[hahahmm]

@Adivabbaby Standards of beauty were higher in the past. Most of what they call models & actresses today wouldn't have been allowed on tv/in movies/on magazine covers. Get it?

[Adivabbaby]

Yes I get you

[MCheetah]

I don't think she's physically attractive and never have (aside from her voice in the movie "Her"), so no. She looks like a typical 30-something year old Karen from the city I grew up in (Philly). She'd probably be a real estate agent and married to a man named "Trevor."

[dustybiker]

I only really remember her in The Horse Whisperer and she was just a baby then. It’s strange to see her grown up. I’d say she has strength in unique beauty now. Kinda like Pink.

[Snsl153]

A much nicer picture

[Andres77]

Just goes to show that still pictures are not enough.
Her acting, her expressions and ability AND looks put her in the "exotic" box for me. And the only blonde that gets the "exotic" vote from me.
Just my own humble opinion.😉

[Kaneki05]

No I wouldn't. She's not that attractive if she wasn't famous for been Black Widow no one would claim such a thing, also along with conventional beauty been a weird term that one couldn't accurately sum up since subjective exists.

[Кураж]

I find her very "generic white woman with dyed blonde hair" looking.
Not ugly, just nothing remotely interesting about her face.

[RuthlessAggression]

Aren't all "actresses" conventional beauty. Isn't that why they've gone in to acting/modeling

I don't know. I don't really know what conventional beauty is but if I had to say so yes, she would be

[TommyMountainFigure]

You haven't picked the best photos of her, but I certainly wouldn't call her ugly!

[Noreason432]

She's pretty but she's also had lots of surgical procedures

[EnglishEuropean]

I know right? She used to have a nose.

[Noreason432]

@englisheuropean
She must have had at least two rhinoplasties. At this point her nose has started to resemble Michael Jackson

[Birdlegs]

The first avengers movie is peak Scarlett Johansson

[leahzrc]

if she was in your hometown and not famous she would be considered gorgeous

[motownplayer2000]

Some people may say that. I just say she is sometimes attractive. She has a body.. but I’ve seen much much prettier faces than hers.. body bangin tho

[Rockstarrrrr]

I never understood why people call her THAT beautiful... She's not that pretty at all

[LimitedBenefits101]

she was hot when she had long hair now she's ugly and looks like a stud.

[Anonymous]

She looks like any other walmart customer in picture 3. I always thought she's overrated.

[TheFlak38]

she's so fucking ugly you have to be too horny to like her.

[one1wild00]

She's OK, better conventional would be Nichole Kidman or Kate Winslet

[dolemite89]

she was sexy in her prime and has a nice voice. i’ve heard she’s a bully to other actresses and has herpes tho lol

[Imsmurter1]

She’s hot I like her cause she’s part Israeli I think that’s what sends her looks past the edge

[Anonymous]

She used to be. She getting kind of up there in years now.

[elsaloulou]

yes I think so
anyway she is gorgeous and I don't care what y'all think

[BCA6010]

She looks good for her age and lifestyle.

[Flower7]

No, her looks don’t seem to be conventional.