Ummmm
No.
Raquel Welch was much better and much more naturally attractive and much naturally classier.
June 1968 not quite 28 on Johnny Carson
https://www.youtube.com/embed/8p6fG2Cvzd4April 1967 not quite 27 on What's My Line
https://www.youtube.com/embed/1BKPwS62FaQArlene Francis summarizes it well at the end...
"Your pictures don't do you justice; you're a beauty."
From her lengthy Vogue obituary.
https://www.vogue.com/article/raquel-welch-obituaryThroughout her career, Welch set herself apart from a previous generation of submissive sex symbols with striking roles in projects such as One Million Years B. C. (1966) and The Three Musketeers (1973). Her look, both on and off-screen, also came to define the beauty ideals of the late 1960s and 1970s.
Most Helpful Opinions
Everything can think their own thoughts. And i don't like how she looks or for that matter "that type of look" it's really unattractive to me.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
9Opinion
Hard no from me. Not even in the top 20% of facial beauty.
I prefer audrey hepburn, she is the most beautiful girl i ever seen.
Her face is her best feature, no doubt.Not the most beautiful face ever.
Not one bit...
For me she is not pretty
Oh yeah what a sexy underbite. 😹
Meh..
Gross
0/10 She Is Ugly As Sin, Piece Of Garbage
Neither
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!