



Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 



Ummmm
No.
Raquel Welch was much better and much more naturally attractive and much naturally classier.
June 1968 not quite 28 on Johnny Carson
April 1967 not quite 27 on What's My Line
Arlene Francis summarizes it well at the end...
"Your pictures don't do you justice; you're a beauty."
From her lengthy Vogue obituary.
https://www.vogue.com/article/raquel-welch-obituaryThroughout her career, Welch set herself apart from a previous generation of submissive sex symbols with striking roles in projects such as One Million Years B. C. (1966) and The Three Musketeers (1973). Her look, both on and off-screen, also came to define the beauty ideals of the late 1960s and 1970s.
Everything can think their own thoughts. And i don't like how she looks or for that matter "that type of look" it's really unattractive to me.
Opinion
9Opinion
Hard no from me. Not even in the top 20% of facial beauty.
Her face is her best feature, no doubt.
I prefer audrey hepburn, she is the most beautiful girl i ever seen.
Not the most beautiful face ever.
Not one bit...
For me she is not pretty
Oh yeah what a sexy underbite. 😹
Meh..
Gross
0/10 She Is Ugly As Sin, Piece Of Garbage
Neither
You can also add your opinion below!