Me with or me without? Would those who like tattoos rather see their girlfriend with or without, even though they have lots of tattoos themself? Would that seem odd that they like tattoos, but not on their woman? Does that sound hypocritical at all?

Me with or me without? Would those who like tattoos rather see their girlfriend with or without, even though they have lots of tattoos themself? Would that seem odd that they like tattoos, but not on their woman? Does that sound hypocritical at all?

With. Being heavily inked myself, I think tattoos are sexy on a woman. That being said tattoos are an artform. There's art that's museum worthy and art that should never see the light of day. It's all a matter of taste.
Even after countless tattoo reality shows and them becoming more mainstream, they also still maintain a stigma for the people that get them, they may be of dubious character or low class, especially for women there seems to be a double standard that they are unladylike or whoreish, because they make you look less feminine and more like a thug. As a result if you would show some people the same artwork on a on a canvas, they'd be like, 'I think its great', but all of a sudden when it's tattooed on a woman's body, it becomes, "Why would you ever do that to yourself?"
I remember many years ago, I was on the subway standing as all the seats were full, I woman seated in front of me. She was looking intently at my arms and I caught her and she smiled and said, "That's not your average tattoo, that's art". I thanked her and we chatted for the next fifteen minutes before my next stop and I discovered that she's a fine artist in Stockholm who works as a portrait artist for a living. I asked her if she had any ink and said no, but after seeing mine, she had a whole new level of respect for tattoos as an artistic medium and she said she'd be proud to wear art of a similar caliber.
The world of fashion allows people to dress and express themselves how they want. Everybody decorates their dwellings to express themselves how they want. I don't see tattoos as being any different.
To me a beautiful woman getting a beautiful tattoo is just elevating the aesthetic. Now the adjective, 'beautiful' is in the eye of the beholder, so everybody will have their own opinion.
And yes, if I guy likes tattoos for himself and finds them 'ugly', on a woman, then yes, that is being hypocritical.
Did you see the video I posted? Do you think covering up your old ones with black ink is even uglier than the original tattoos?
@YesterdaysChild Yes I do, but tattoos go way deeper than just visuals. Not a fan of Kat Von D so this is the first time I heard about it and I was shocked to see it. Most of us get tattoos that represent something significant in our lives. So the art itself is very personal and has deep emotional ties to us. I don't know the circumstance behind her doing it. Perhaps the ink she had affected her emotionally in such an adverse way, that by blacking them out was the only way to bring her some inner peace. My first tattoo I got almost 20 years ago as a tribute to my dad after he died. It's something that I cherish, so I have zero regrets. Also I'm fortunate to have started my tattoo journey in my 30's once I was a grown ass man, better equipped to make better permanent life decisions, and my artist happens to be one of the best there is, two contributing factors to me never worrying about my decisions in the future. While I do think that what she did is not aesthetically pleasing, I respect her for doing what's right for her, as it's her body afterall and nobody's opinion really matters except her own.
That was very well said.
W out. Tattoos to me on a girl I don’t like. Sure maybe a little something is fine. But the first one w all the tats, to me that’s more of a masculine thing. Most of the girls who I’ve met who have had body sleeves like that tended to be more manly, argumentative. I like the clean, innocent look. Something about all the tats makes me think she’s has issues. To me a female body is a temple, the creator whoever that may be made women beautiful as they are. Especially if she’s was blessed w even more beauty than others such as the girl in the pic. To me all those tats just desecrates pure beauty. I wouldn’t mind maybe a small tat on her ankle or her wrist if she wanted a little something. But the other is too extreme. Now am I going to turn down a chick who came up to me hot as hell like that w tats who wants sex from me? No lol but marriage wise, I’d prefer the girl on the right.
I take it you were using Kat Von Dee tattoo concealer? Well, I like the without, but it's the guy that has to live with it. Interestingly enough, there are a lot of people who got tattoos when they were younger, including celebrities, who are having them removed. And Kat Von D is one of them. But not removed, but covered up.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/NRoOaSp7CMAYes I was. It works pretty well.
Opinion
26Opinion
The girl on the right is far more attractive. Tattoos are a desecration of the body to me. Unnatural and a distraction of what’s beautiful just left alone.
Lots of people agree with you.
Without - you may think they 'look good' now but what about 10-15-20 years down the line do you still think that they'll 'look good'? And how many guys do you think would want Marriage/ Long Term Relationship with a tattooed you? It will not be as many as you think.
I do not see any reason for anyone to disfigure their own body with tattoos! Male or female or any other claimed gender. Should be obvious which picture that I prefer!
Tattoos like that are not attractive at all. Whatever possed you to get something like that?
It really depends on the tattoo. Those ones don't look very good. So you look better without. If you're going to get a tattoo make sure you get something worthwhile and from a skilled artist.
I prefer without. The main reason is because it is just a lot to look at. Like when you are in a clean and tidy room vs one with things all over. It’s just harder to relax and I feel tattoos can be the same way. Art also tends to bring out emotion depending on what it is. I wouldn’t want to look at something that continually reminds me of that
to be honest i don'T give a damn about tatoos really doesn't change much for me. but i like innocent looks so without tatoos i will go.
If those are before and after, I think you looked better without to be honest.
And yeah, I do find that hypocritical
You mean you like tattoos but not on a woman you would date?
The girl on the right is much more attractive. The girl on the left has paid for college for the tattoo artist's children.
Not a fan of tattoos and wouldn't want my woman to go through the pain of getting those.
If she wants little pain I have better and fun ways she would like.
Without
I would date neither, they're too high in body fat for me.
You do realize that boobs are mostly fat, yet you like those, right?
When girls gain weight, so do their boobs, and when they lose weight, their boobs lose too, unless they are implants.
I'm just not a fan of tattoos
I feel they represent the pain, sorrow and joy in a person's life
Both women are beautiful
Is one you?
I DON'T SEE ANYTHING BUT TITS
Is that good or bad? 😯
I love both of them as they have big boobs and a very nice booty i would like to spank them and suck their boobies
The girl on the right.
Look great with or without
Without. the boobages are sufficient!
Without tattoo looks better
Without. I love a pure clean looking girl.
Gross and trashy.
Without tattoos is sexy.
To me the extent of the ink is too much.
With. Tattoo are incredibly sexy
Without. Tatoos=turnoff.
With 100%
Without
without
You can also add your opinion below!