Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
To be honest I think it's BS.
One man is able to impregnate a woman as many times as she can. Moreoverthat one man can impregnate too many women.
Just think about how many children a woman can have and how many children a man can have.
In some case male promiscuity can be explained biologically unlike female promiscuity.
female promiscuity is easily explained: the lower value a woman is the more likely she is going to have to offer easy sexual access to compete for the attention of high value men.
that'd be consistent with there being an inverse correlation with female attractiveness and casual sex partners.
hot women can get high value men to invest in them without (at least immediately) offering sex in return.
not so hot women CAN'T.
^ this also is consistent even with modern dating app soft polygyny culture, where tons of women "choose to remain single" (because they can't snag that high value man for an LTR) by just remaining part of one or a few harems (no single woman is ever really that single, high likelihood she's getting dick somewhere, probably from one of those guys)
There are evolutionary strategies that advantage a hoe.
A woman might marry a man to secure his resources for her and her children but prefer to get pregnant to a man who has better genes. That seemed to be a thing in more stratified societies. William the Conqueror was one such child.
In addition if multiple men think it might their child they can be called upon for resources.
Another strategy is let the best sperm win. Given the wining sperm creates a child just like dear old dad the women's sons would be likely have more than the average number of progeny which means her genes become more dominant. Her hoe genes might pass to her daughters and exactly the same result.
Ironically the same applies to getting pregnant to a rapist back in 2 Million BC. It would help that women's genes to spread if her sons were like their rapist dad..
Most men in nature and in current day society cannot even provide for over 5-10 childern at most. Some cannot even provide for 1 child tbh. They are not designed to spread their seed at all. Women are designed to take multiple men and her body chooses the strongest sperm out of the group to have the strongest baby. So it is more natural for a woman to seek out multiple partners than it is for a man.
Also women have many times in their life where sex is purely for fun like whenever they are not ovulating, are pregnant or have hit menopause. So fun wise women are getting to have that while men aren't. They have to be fertile 24/7 cuz their chances of finding a woman are so slim
A man not providing for his child and baby mama is unnatural. And lots of women don't take care of their childern. They get abortions, give up for adoption, some women have also been know to throw their babies in the trash after birth.
Men and women who do these type of things like not providing or not caring for their babies are obviously just shit human beings
Lets be real most men don't have access to that many women to impregnate unless he's raping them.
Women can have lots of childern if they choose to. We are fertile for 40- 50 years.
I've only been sexual active for 10 years and I've been pregnant 6 times. That was with me being "safe" some of the time
Access or not.
He IS able to. w
We are talking about biology.
See you claim women can have lots of children just to diregard the fact that they can't compete with men regarding the number of children they can have.
How many women can an average man impregnate in a week?
How many times can a woman get pregnant and give birth in a week? Lol it takes 9 months, right?
Maybe 7
But not a week.
To find or not, his physical abilities allow him to impregnate many many women.
22 children is not too many for an average man to be able to have.
Once again how many women can one man impregnate in his life.
Think about it.
You bring up his ability of being able to turn women on so they agree with it blah blah blah. It doesn't refute the fact that he is physically able to impregnate too too many women.
I have noticed that in every aspect you upgrade women and degrade men. Like in aby way women are superior to men. Lol
Even in this case when any rational person understands men can have more children than women can you still deny that obvious fact. Why? Because you see having many children as an advantage. Therefore women should have all advatages over men according to you. If you worship women so much why did you marry a man?
www.history.co.uk/.../most-prolific-dads-from-history
Let me know when you have your 3000th child.
Lol
It's the spreading their seed.
You always change the oath and claim average men can't sleep with many women. But it doesn't disregard his biological abilities of impregnating.
Show me one woman in history that could have a 1000 kids.
Go ahead.
"Women can sleep with many men and have their babies while they all provide for her and the babies."
How many men are willing to have children from such a slut and still provide?
Lol
There are some really strict requirements for sperm donations. They have to be above 6ft, healthy weight, still young, a college degree. Most banks aren't willing to take from just any guy. Maybe in other countries they are more chill about it? I don't know since I've never looked into that
A man has to be at least 5'8
A woman has to be at least 5'2.
Sorry but shitty female genes are not wanted either.
By the way a man can impregnate 4-9 womem a day (1460-2430 women a year).
And it makes no sense to say women are meant to sleep with multiple men no matter how much sluts want to think that. Women select the best man before deciding to have sex. Otherwise women would see no difference between men regarding physical characteristics.
I think women have been taught to sleep with multiple women because it feels good and keeps them close which can help keep people together to take care of children.
Opinion
18Opinion
Biologically, humans are engineered to produce the maximum amount of offspring to ensure species survival.
Men can impregnate more than one woman in a short period of time. Women can be impregnated once, then need to wait the whole birth cycle to be impregnated again.
You cannot accelerate the birth cycle. That's the real limiting factor in breeding capacity
HOWEVER, for each offspring, the girl can choose whoever she wants to father the next offspring. There is no biological disposition that says the first partner has to father the rest, so the answer is "Yes, nature did design women to be able to sleep with more than one man"
We are seeing this from a biological point of view only. The father may or may not be alive when the offspring is born. If you take into consideration psychosocial elements, the dynamic changes completely
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/other-men-who-left-huge-genetic-legacies-likes-genghis-khan-180954052/
History has proven that alpha men have impregnated way more than their "fair share" of women. So what does that say about human nature?
Women wait at the finish line and F*#$ the winners.
You're confusing biology with sociology and psychology. The three are not the same.
Some women cannot get into any relationship, and even when they do, cannot get pregnant. Some get pregnant easily, others struggle with one. Etc etc.
It's not a simple equation of "make more babies" as not a lot of relationships can make babies. Hence the decline in fertility.
The gay relationship, is a different thing entirely as they cannot biologically produce, and are an evolutionary dead end. But they are after personal gratification, and not any sort of spiritual or lineage link.
Sort of like a junkie/alcoholic pissing their inheritance away, as they don't know any better. Or don't care to know better.
The biological motivation for a woman to sleep with several men is sperm competition. Let several men deposit into her and the best sperm wins. So yes--there absolutely IS a natural design for female promiscuity. It's why women are MUCH more likely to cheat AND to not have their lover use protection when they are at their most fertile.
Biologically, it's most advantageous for a woman to pair bond with a man who will provide for her, while at the same time to be impregnated by a guy with the best genes. This COULD be the same man, but often it is not. That's why there is a biological motivation for women to cheat.
Surely you've read some biology and are familiar with this concept, no?
Correct. The point is to have this sex BEFORE getting pregnant. That's when there's an advantage to getting the best genes. So an orgy that leads to sperm competition can be biologically advantageous.
The point of sex DURING pregnancy would be pair bonding. So it makes sense from that perspective but there is no genetic advantage to getting more loads from different partners at that stage. In some environments it could be useful for several men to think they may be the father to improve the chances of the child after birth, so that could potentially be a motivation.
"That's when there's an advantage to getting the best genes"
A man with bad genes can still impregmate a woman.
"So an orgy that leads to sperm competition can be biologically advantageous"
What if the first guy impregnates so no chance for other men to impregnate her while she us pregnant but the 10th man has better genes than that 1st man that impregnated her?
I just did. Pair bonding with whichever guy you need to keep around during and after pregnancy.
Correct. The point of sperm COMPETITION is that the guy with the better sperm is MORE LIKELY to impregnate the woman.
Did you read what I wrote?
1) BEFORE she's pregnant, it can be advantageous to have sex with MULTIPLE partners for the sperm competition.
2) AFTER getting pregnant, it is advantageous to have sex with the SAME partner for pair bonding which will help secure resources for the mother and child.
You're familiar with the concept of a "trade off," no?
1) Why does a woman's libido increase during pregnancy if her sexual needs are not linked to having many sexual partners?
2) if it is advantageous to have sex with the SAME partner for pair bonding to secure resources for the mother and child then it follows that it is not advantageous to have children from multiple men because it loosens her ability of pair bonding and also because men won't take care of others' children.
No wonder why so many men refuse to date women with children.
1) BECAUSE THERE'S MORE THAN ONE MOTIVATION FOR LIBIDO!!! PRIOR to pregnancy its to get the best GENES available for reproduction. DURING pregnancy it's to bond a man to her to get support for raising kids and to help when she's in a vulnerable pregnancy state. What part of that is unclear?
2) Yes--there is a TRADEOFF to extra partners prior to pregnancy. On the one hand, the sperm competition gives a woman a chance at scoring better genetics for her kids. On the other hand, being subsequently dumped by the alpha dude who knocked her up can most definitely compromise her ability to raise the kid. That's the TRADEOFF. That's why there's a motivation to do some sneaky fucking behind the back of a dedicated male. If it works out, you get the best of both worlds. If it doesn't you can find yourself fucked in more ways than one.
Study biology and evolutionary biology. Put down the social indoctrination bullshit for a few seconds and have a look at nature.
Wow--you really have trouble holding two ideas in your head at the same time, huh? The motivation of sperm competition and the motivation of pair bonding are two DIFFERENT things. They compete in the real world. Kinda like your motivation to not die from thirst and your motivation not to get eaten by an alligator. There's a reason you see animals congregate at waterholes even though they might get eaten. They have COMPETING drives.
Sometimes contractions are inherent in the world. That doesn't mean they don't exist. Your inability to grasp that is astounding. You also seem to be incapable of grasping how to differentiate between GENERAL RULES which apply to MUCH of what's observed in the world and SPECIFIC INSTANCES which can obviously differ at any given point from the general rule. That doesn't make the rule invalid, it just means it isn't an ironclad law. Turns out, most of the world isn't governed by ironclad laws.
You should work on developing some epistemic humility. Being able to understand uncertainty and probability would also help you. And some basic logic like being able to tell the difference between a decent rule of thumb and something that has to hold true at all times.
It is 2 contradicting ideas that make your explanation BS.
What about sluts who don't want kids?
Where is that biology and evolution?
What about women who want to have many kids and only one sexual partner?
Where is their biological motivation of having sex with many men to see who gets them pregnant?
See?
Whether a woman wants to be monogamous or not, whether she wants to have kids from one men or more have nothing to do with your biology.
@anonymous the reason for having sex during pregnancy is not exactly to bond. It's acutally a way for the cervix and uterus to prepare for a healthy birth. Having a lot of orgasms during pregnancy can help this as well but the sperm from a man plays a big part in making the cervix soft. a lot of lesbians that are pregnant end up going overdue because of not having sex with a man.
Also if they do a hospital induction their is a medicine they rub on the cervix that has all the same things as sperm in it but it a mega powerful dose to get the baby out faster
@Apple1996 That totally makes sense. There could indeed be MULTIPLE benefits to having copious amounts of sex DURING pregnancy. And if there are multiple benefits, that's all the reason you'd need for to make an increase in female libido adaptive from an evolutionary perspective.
But one benefit that does NOT exist for having lets of sex DURING pregnancy is to get the best genes for the offspring. That comes in to play BEFORE conception but obviously (depending on the density of the reader) can not have any impact DURING pregnancy.
Don't listen to all that gen alpha crap, it's all some animalistic thinking, the core of their argument is that we are animals so we should behave like animals, the truth is only people that lack intelligence eat up all that crap, cause let's be foreal, only a buffoon would wanna devolve back to animalistic behavior, that of course says a lot when someone with the intelligence of a human that has the ability to think and rationally behaven chooses to act like an animal 💀
Behave*
Key word CHOOSES
lmao
I think society has created the lie that we're not designed to be monogamous. Mostly the last 70 years.
Total bullshit. All sleeping with so many people you feel the need to refer to it as a "body count" gets you is a series of life threatening STIs...
Stds can be explained scientifically. And if your nasty ass sleeps around you gonna catch STD's. That goes for both men and women. Respect yourselves 🙄
Hypergamy has been around for a very long time. I think nature/God designed them that way for the bulk of human history, where the strong multiplied and the weak died out. I think monogamy on a large scale is fairly new in the grand scheme of human history. But in the last 1,000 years it’s helped create strong family units which created strong communities and strong cultures and advanced humanity.
In a evolutionary sense, yes. F***ing many women and producing offspring increases genetic diversity. In an evolutionary sense that is good.
But there are 8 billion people... I think there's enough people. And we ain't animals. Just because you can go around sticking your wick into every woman you see doesn't mean you should.😆
"anyways nature didn't design women to sleep with women"
I'm sure there would be some Lesbians that would disagree with that. :p
But yes there are biological differences in that men can sleep with women and leave them before child is born.
While women can't just leave the same way. Not before child is born anyway.
But most people (both women and men), I think/hope want to either avoid pregnancy or take care of their children.
Not just make children and abandon them.
One logical one I can think of is,
If there are women who enjoy sex and don't want to get pregnant,
WLW sex doesn't lead to pregnancy...
Otherwise, I dunnu, emotional arguments?
Like the heart wants what the heart wants?
Yes, but the main reason is that human beings are polygynous, which is why men have a higher libido. In promiscuous species such as chimpanzees, both sexes have the same libido, so both sexes are promiscuous and there is no sexual dimorphism.
Well, if the question is "women were designed to sleep with multiple men," then the answer is no. Only females of promiscuous species like chimpanzees were designed for that.
logic, if not for society, the same as one male monkey can hav 5 kids same year from 5 wives, human too , but inverse, 1 lady only 1 kid possible even if 5 males. lady not for many.
women bodies r a miracle
the fact our wombs r able to accept a new living being letting it grow within it is so special
I think biologically it definitely makes sense. Although, it definitely can be more complex to maintain the relationship. Although not necessarily.
I’m not a lesbian but if I had a choice I’d rather sleep with a woman, I don’t fully understand your question.
Women were given the right to design the house and be the center. The man born with a greater sex drive usually needs to settle down at some point and start a family. This is nature.
No. God's original design was for one man to be with only one woman.
People just pervert sex to fulfill their lust.
Every healthy man can able to make any woman pregnant till body keep producing sperm..
Men try to get as many partners, women try to select the best one.
I wish multiple women would sleep with me 🤣🤣
No, I don't think so, lol :D
You can also add your opinion below!
