If a girl don’t get a rich husband she is considered as a loser?

[Crazzyyworld]

[thatshydork]

Money means nothing if the relationship is actually based on love. It might help provide stability in the relationship, but money is not the stem of a relationship.

Also, how much money one has does not tell you the kind of person they are. A person can be poor as dirt and yet have the biggest heart of all man kind. A person could also have enough riches to touch the sky and yet they could have the kindness and personality of a grumpy pebble. The size of one’s wallet has nothing to do with the contents of their heart and soul.

Just because one may not have money doesn’t mean they won’t treat their partner well and just because someone does have money doesn’t mean they will and vice versa.

[Crimsyjo]

Hahaha... I'm in UK. I hear thos question a lot about women wanting rich husbands or men thinking women will only want a rich guy.

The concept is extremely foreign to me. Not sure if that's my culture or me personally. Money is not the deciding factor of love and attraction or choosing to date.

[O_Canada]

Demon's bride, bah-bah
Wealth's infernal command
Souls sold for false love
Hellfire seals the pact's demand

Bleed out broken hearts
For fortune's disguise
Dance with devils gleefully

Brimstone tides collide
With dreams of nada
Chasing riches endlessly

Scorched flesh in hand
Offer willingly
To Satan's alpha
Seal your damned destiny
With blood of grandma
Cursing all eternity

[Billlewis]

No, ma'am, because there are plenty of devoted guys, who despite not being rich in the classic sense of the word, are still excellent candidates for this type of lifestyle, because we're so dedicated to serving you, and we have enough capital to make a substantial difference in the quality of your lives.

[Anonymous]

No. Not at all. Women far out number men who are rich. The amount of rich men on this earth is nothing compared to how many women are on this earth. The numbers may go up or down depending on what the definition of rich is. Regardless even if we said being rich was making six figures or more women still far exceed that.

[Anonymous]

No….. a lot of women looking for money are losers. If they’re honest about what they want this is one thing, but it’s another for women who lie and make a man feel like she genuinely loves him.

These are women who can’t do really anything on their own. They aren’t even good wives most the time.

[bobby_bush_eater]

If she comes home and is in a loving fulfilling marriage (kids is obviously a different topic but that too), has things to look forward to, and is content then how could you be a loser?

Material wealth is great but relationships are ultimately more important to a human long term

[XHopelessRomanticX]

No of course not. Be the kind of woman who builds men up, not the kind who marries based on income.

[on_my_knees]

Wait, aren't you from @O_Canada? What do you care about riches? You should be happy playing hockey and drinking maple syrup.

[Grim_Adjudicator]

What a childish perception you have of Canada. They don't just play hockey and drink maple syrup. They will also track a moose for miles through the snow to apologize to the moose.

[O_Canada]

@Thanks_for_the_MHO!

[HighValue]

No. For a woman to be a loser, she would need to either have a promiscuous past, used drugs, drinks lots of alcohol, is unfaithful, or is a single mother with multiple different baby daddies.

[EmmaMary]

What complete and utter fucking Bollox.

And with the utmost respect, someone your age (43) should know this. smh

[Anonymous]

? that girl should make her own money then. don't depend on a guy for money, EVER. she's a loser if she think she can sit around and have money all because her husband is "rich". like... have some goals.

[adventurous-1]

I think it depends on the crowd she travels in and her upbringing and social status. It's seen as more of a requirement today than in the past due to social media and feminism.

[Kelley1]

Of course not. Otherwise, since rich men are rare, that would make most women losers.

[patois]

If that is her priority, then she's a loser no matter what she gets.

[Sasquach]

Not everyone is destined to be rich, it's very shameful to think that 90% of the population would be losers exclusively due to their socioeconomic status

[LaurenM1997]

I dont need a rich husband I’m not with him for his money 🤦‍♀️

[LiamJHayden]

Depending upon how you define rich that could make 99% of women losers. The answer is "No."

[vj0090]

But why a rich guy is needed... girl can become rich by herself... self dependent is the word I guess...

[handsomelad70]

H**L NO !!! My father was far from rich and my mother was no loser.

[Theodora1983]

Depends if he or she became rich whiles your together no. But married cause the or she got money. To Me make sounds like became person of the night.

[Anonymous]

Yes. And if she does get a rich husband she is also a loser.

Marinate on that one for a bit and get back to me. 😆

[msc545]

Yes, in the US, that is the primary reason women marry.

[Twalli]

No, she clearly realized there's more than money to life.

[OhLongJohnsoning]

Nope.

If she doesn't get a guy that treats her well, then she's a loser

[exitseven]

No, marrying a rich guy will not make you happy.

[Jennz6]

I’m not a Gold digger

[Dongie]

Better than to be known as a gold-digger.

[4ngelic]

no...

[ItsAshh2009]

No. Not at all

[Awantika03]

Nope

[jahaims]

No lmfao

[BarryLiverstone]

Nope

[Anonymous]

No just unlucky.

[noohair]

No..

[Idkwhattoput03]

Not at all

[eagle1951]

who saids