Girls, why do women do their nails or put on nail polish and then start acting as if they occupy a higher status?

[Anonymous]

Nail polish and nail accessories literally make women look worse to me, yet they assume they look better to me, which is even more off-putting. (I also see the same behavior with makeup.)

What makes some of you think that your damn nails increases your status?

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Hahahaha what a nonsense thing to believe. We already know you have an issue with nail polish and probably women in general, but no need to post about it here.

To think that something innocuous as nail polish somehow raises our status is laughable. It just looks pretty and makes some of us feel better and well kept. Hell, it can be art for those that are really good at it. It doesn't mean we suddenly think we are better than others.

Grow up.

[Asker]

I see you've done a lot of growing up! You're 47! I'm not in any rush to catch up with you on the "growing up" though.

Women have formed a cult and excluded the good ones by calling them "pick me". Then the good ones join the cult and there are very few outside. So I do have a problem with many women because they are part of that nonsensical cult. The "pick me" girls are great though - I have no problem with them whatsoever.

Now we're on the same page - it is stupid to think that your doing your nails (or makeup) increases your status. So now explain to me why women act as if they have a higher status as a result of adding these low effort, low yield things to their bodies. Are they unknowingly doing something stupid? Is it peer pressure?

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

What are you going on about? Pick me's are just a term used for people who try and act a certain way to gain favor from those who would oppress them.

And maybe you weren't paying attention when I said that it doesn't make us feel like we have a higher status. Stop projecting your thoughts onto us.

[Nikki1989]

@Ez-Bri-Z_v2 The funny part about this is he has the nerve to tell you to grow up. The irony here is extreme with his nutter.

[Asker]

@Nikki1989 You seem to be very irritated! Is she not the one that told me to grow up? I did not even tell her to grow up. Read her first answer: it clearly says "Grow up" before I had mentioned anything about growing up.

No need to respond again, I know you have no intention of taking accountability for your incorrect assumption.

[Asker]

Ah, I smell foul play!

Someone got a moderator or whoever to QUIETLY remove my response to Ez-Bri-Z_v2's message that said, " What are you going on about? Pick me's are just a term used...".

Was my argument against feminism too strong for you guys to handle?

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Lmao you aren't strong enough in any aspect, mentally, emotionally and most likely physically. Please don't try and act like this is some sort of competition. That's childish.

Let me reiterate, pick me's are those who seek to get on the good side of those who would oppress them. Think of housewives for example. You see all these social media posts of these rich "homemakers" talking about how wonderful it is to be a homemaker when the reality is that most have help from outside sources to take care of the kids and house. It's exhausting to take care of the kids 24/7 with no breaks, with a husband most likely to take the night off after coming home from 8 hours of work and saying he earns the money so she can take care of the house. That's oppressive. Why does she have to work triple the hours he does, for no pay, and be at the mercy of her husband hoping he doesn't cheat or divorce her because then she would have no money, no job, and most likely no house to live in?

Again, that's oppressive.

Sure, feminism says that it's her choice to live her best life, but it doesn't make her any less of a pick me.

[Asker]

I'm not reading your ridiculous response after your gang decided to remove my argument against your nonsense. Have a good day.

[tiredpanda]

[Asker]

What do you have to say about this? You have an opportunity to explain but you've spent your time so far sending a GIF.

[tiredpanda]

You spend your time moaning about women ☺️

[Asker]

Look, another useless reply. Since you think it's a problem that I am mentioning this, how about you comment on the fact that so many women have an essentially infinite list of icks?

[tiredpanda]

You are too old for all this nonsense.

[Asker]

Textbook diversions. How would you know I am too old for this? You are too weak to address things directly.

[tiredpanda]

Because you’re not a teenager. I might have some understanding if a teenage boy had that sort of mentality but from a grown-ass man it’s just bizarre. Why would I bother addressing every bit of nonsense you come out with? You’ve made quite a few daft assumptions already... That all women do is scroll social media, that having your nails done is somehow making you pretentious, and now this bizarre fixation with “icks”. At some point, perhaps consider that the problem isn’t everyone else being “too weak” to address you directly, its that your assumptions are simply ridiculous.

[Asker]

Your logic is flawed. You bothered addressing my subsequent responses, yet you didn't bother addressing the primary thing. How stupid is that? Perhaps if you were rational you would've addressed my initial question and then I would've been satisfied and you would not have needed to waste effort typing out these nonsense replies. You were sensible enough to respond to the previous thing about social media with your list of hobbies proving you have a life.

[tiredpanda]

That’s rich coming from you ☺️
The primary thing wasn’t a question. It was you taking a personal dislike and presenting it as a fact about women. Same pattern with the rest of it. You calling my logic flawed while writing essays about all this stuff and thinking like this is bizarre. I answered what was worth answering.

[Asker]

Nope, it is not rich. It is a question paired with a fact that some women act as if their status' have been increased as a result of cosmetics. You have chosen not to answer it and responded with your flawed logic. The stuff you answered was actually a waste of time and you're still responding so you also think the previous message is worth answering somehow too. Who told you thinking like this is bizarre? People like you like to name-call to stop opinions like mine from spreading, then when they get out anyway you call it "bizarre". You are clearly being disingenuous.

[tiredpanda]

That’s not a fact. That’s you deciding painted nails equal a status climb, then adding that you find it ugly. Your taste isn’t evidence. Neither is your theory about why they do it. I didn’t answer it because it was a complaint wearing a question mark. I answered the rest because you kept chasing the thread calling that “logic”. You’re still here after saying the replies were a waste of time. So pick one.

Nobody’s stopping your opinion from spreading. It’s just not the insight you think it is. You’re not being silenced, you’re being told the premise is bad. Those aren’t the same thing.

[Asker]

Hey, you responded again! To think this is worth addressing but my original question wasn't. Why don't you also address the fact that so many women have a seemingly infinite list of icks? That is in the same class of things I am complaining about, isn't it?

I am not surprised that you could not identify that the fact I was referring to was "that some women act as if their status' have been increased as a result of cosmetics" which was written very clearly. Of course you decided to pull in information about my taste that no one was calling "evidence". From this alone, your argument is flawed because you rely on false premises (that YOU created).

You are actually incorrect that no one is stopping my opinions from spreading because a response I made to someone else here was literally taken down by some moderator. Crazy, huh.

[tiredpanda]

Some women have a long list of icks. Some men do too. That’s their problem. If it bothers you, don’t date those people. You don’t need a theory of womanhood about it. I didn’t invent a premise. You put it in the original post. That’s you. Don’t act like I dragged it in.

A moderator removing one of your comments isn’t my department and it isn’t proof of a campaign against your ideas. You’re still here typing right? Complain to them. I’m not the site.

[Asker]

No, you listed what I said about having a distaste as the fact I was referring to despite the fact that the fact I was referring to was in clear view following the words "It is a question paired with a fact that..." So YOU introduced that false premise. If you can't see that then that's a problem with your own capabilities. A moderator removing my post literally disproves your claim that "Nobody’s stopping your opinion from spreading" because SOMEBODY is. Please fix your flawed logic. You're just spewing words at this point. You also responded again.

[tiredpanda]

One comment getting pulled down doesn’t mean your opinion is being stopped. This whole thread is still up and you’re still in it. If it got removed, you probably insulted someone.
I responded again because I felt like it. That still doesn’t mean the first question earned a dissertation. You’re not catching me in a logic trap. It’s just funny that you’re the one lecturing about logic while yours is that all women do is scroll, feed on drama, and do their nails to climb a ladder.

Have a good one

[Asker]

I didn't say my opinion was "stopped" I insinuated that people were trying to stop it, not that they were successful. Stop twisting my words into something false so that your counter sounds valid.

I did not insult anyone and they even removed it silently without giving me a notification (or a reason obviously). They know they have no valid reason to remove it other than to stop opposition to their biased agendas.

You don't seem to even know what logic is.

[itss_lily]

um wtf are you talking about?

[Asker]

Read it again.

[itss_lily]

its complete nonsense

[Abbycado]

Lol, coming from an anon. XD

[Asker]

"Anon". You guys have jargon on this website.

How about you actually clarify?

[Nikki1989]

How old are you really?

[Asker]

How old are you? Why are you always typing in italics? You think you're something special.

[Anonymous]

Source?

[Asker]

Source: my eyes.

People like you think every undocumented thing does not exist. Please fix your methodology.