What’s your thoughts on these statistics? it says that A girl that has only 3 or less bodies has an 80 percent chance of lasting in a marriage?

Question

A girl that has more than 3 to 6 bodies has a 40 percent chance of lasting in a marriage , and a girl that has 6 to 10 bodies has a 10 percent chance of lasting in a marriage , and a girl that has more than 10 bodies , isn’t worth marrying at all? These statistics are based off of divorces. What are your thoughts on this?

loveslongnails · Accepted Answer

My thought is that there's an absolute TON of research on this subject, and depending on which answers you want for your narrative, one of them will fit best. I went into this in depth about 5 years ago, and was a bit surprised at the numbers.

The problem I ran into is " who, or which organization, is funding the study?" It shouldn't make a difference, but it did to a point. There are very FEW organizations you can trust that are free to conduct unbiased studies because they are not beholding to their funders. With that in mind, here's some interesting things I learned. These do not involve percentages, but rather, trends:

* There is indeed a correlation between having fewer sexual partners and a more stable marriage, but it is stronger in women than men. Women having 0 or 1 sexual partners marrying men with 0 or 1 sexual partner had the longest trend, but it made NO significant difference IF it was 0 or 1 by either party, or 1 or 2 for men.

* If the man's number was 3-4 but the woman remained at 0 -1, studies found they only a minor shift in longevity, whereas if both were 3 -4, the trend shifted lower but as well but not drastically.

* The interesting numbers were men and women between 4 and 9 partners. The decline in longevity steepened, but also plateaued. The evidence seemed to indicate that once you got into upper single or double digits, it didn't change the numbers as much as you'd expect.

So the conclusion is still the fewer partners you've had, the better the odds at a longer marriage, but the average still remains low for first time marrieds at only 8 to 9 years in Western culture.

NathanDavis · Accepted Answer

this reminded me of the "Survivorship Bias" lmao

back when they would look at the old school war planes coming back from the air raids, and they saw how most of the holes were on the wings, the fuselage and the tail... so the military tried to reinforce those areas

it was a Mathematician who actually understood "the math" who told them that their logical interpretation was just wrong... because the planes with heavier damage were shot at the engine and the cockpit, and those planes just never made it back home

this "data" feels the same, and as wrong... "we will look at the chances of a marriage to succeed by focusing on the worst of the marriages, the ones that fail"

that's just stupid... to believe

Karrimurray · Accepted Answer

As a girl, I’d be careful with statistics like that. If the research is real, I’d want to know who was studied, how ‘lasting’ was defined, and whether it actually shows causation before judging women by a number. A person’s past doesn’t automatically determine whether they’ll be loyal, loving, or committed in marriage. Character, compatibility, communication, values, and how two people treat each other matter too.

And honestly, I think reducing a woman’s worth or ability to have a successful marriage to how many people she’s slept with is unfair. People are more complicated than a statistic.

SueShe · Accepted Answer

I don't trust statistics that I have not falsified myself. That is how I would sumarize them.

Who published those statistics and what lobby was behind those statistics and paid to have them published?

A person that has more than one single body count by the age of 20 is not worth marrying and I am not just referring to women. This applies to men as well (and mainly to men). If a person has the need to fornicate left and right should not even consider marriage because we all know that this marriage is likely to end in divorce because those people are incapable of being faithful.

AviatorTom · Answer

As my father always said "Figures don't lie but liars can figure." Numbers? Believe them or not... each individual's choice.

Lliam · Answer

I'm not buying it. Who created that study, The Heritage Society?
Was there a similar study for men?

I think it's a gross generalization that accomplished the biased results it wanted.
It doesn't account for the fact that people can grow up. Their values and attitudes can change.

I have a low opinion of guys who don't think women should have sex before marriage. Those guys have double standards, they are full of sexual inhibitions, they have religious issues and they are domineering. On top of that, they don't know how to assess a person in real life, so they base their judgements on background checks, statistics and sexist baloney from the manosphere.

LazerBean · Answer

Yes the statistics are true. The statistics also show that there are no differences in that between men and women. Just goes to show that promiscuous makes both men and women less valuable for marriage.

Levin · Answer

I think it meets our intuitive experience. We all know the girls who are more towards the 'good girl' scale who tend to have long term relations, be engaged already, etc. You know they have a low body count. And you know the relationship they get in is likely to last.

On the other hand, those in transient relationships all the time are likely to... remain doing so.

That's not to say of course that you can start one way and go the other. Just in general terms.

Kassandra1994 · Answer

Please if you want to find the true one first go get a spiritual cleansing.

If you are doing everything in the physical world and no answer dont you think its time you get spiritual guidance? Get in contact with a fortune teller not that hard get a spiritual cleansing.

Try it won't hurt. If you pay for womans dates why not invested on yourself to get spiritual guisantes?

choco-latte · Answer

I think this just generally applies to people in general, men too. People with higher body counts are more likely to cheat, statistically.

molonski2 · Answer

I think it does show the importance of body count and how it actually will affect your future existence as a female , it's a fact.

elizamichale1 · Answer

I dont know what r those stats based on but those r absolutely nonsense... I have a 5000 plus count n I m happily married n a mum of twin boys

Hispanic-Cool-Guy · Answer

I'm not a statistics guy as statistics doesn't measure each human individual experiences and how their life will turn out, nevertheless, I think its common sense if a woman sleeps around a lot then that it speaksto what kind of character she has and what she really thinks about sex and intimacy.

exitseven · Answer

I think that these statistics are probably true. They are also sexist.

sage2021 · Answer

I believe that a low body count speaks for itself. Probably not going to cheat and end up divorced.

spartan55 · Answer

My thoughts are it's a stupid meaningless 'statistic'.

MzAsh · Answer

Those 80/40/10 numbers aren’t what the research says. And recent research finds the association in men too.

TonyMetal___1986 · Answer

My opinion is that the girl shall be a virgin before marriage! Sex shouldn't be allowed before marriage or at least to have it with the one whom will marry her!

Anonymous · Answer

I don’t believe that. Everyone lies about their body count so you can’t measure it statistically. Plus it matters who asked for the divorce.

msc545 · Answer

Where are those statistics coming from? I'm sure you didn't just make them up or at least I hope you didn't. So where did you got them?

Likes2drive · Answer

If that’s true then most women are not going to stay married long

Pohjolan · Answer

Marrying a slut is less likely to last? Who would have known? Just all of mankind for thousands of years.

Anonymous · Answer

Not true. Body count doesn’t matter. People marry ex porn stars.

ThisSiteSux · Answer

Probably true. I don't know I been married to a virgin for 25 years.

Anonymous · Answer

Where does she keep them, in the garage? The basement?

Deserter3 · Answer

Bunch of simps and women peddling their lies. Ofc body count matters

canamlusciouslad73 · Answer

Thought humans had ONE body !!!

Anonymous · Answer

pretty accurate.

verified · Answer

Hoes gonna be hoes

Agape93 · Answer

Nonsense

robocop666 · Answer

simple they like variety

Cidknee · Answer

Hogwash!

AngryCarl3 · Answer

Seems legit.

What’s your thoughts on these statistics? it says that A girl that has only 3 or less bodies has an 80 percent chance of lasting in a marriage?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Honestly, what do you think is the average body count for women this generation?

What’s your thoughts on these statistics? it says that A girl that has only 3 or less bodies has an 80 percent chance of lasting in a marriage?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Honestly, what do you think is the average body count for women this generation?

We're glad to see you liked this post.