Yes
No
Other/results
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Are women meant to serve men?
Ephesians 5:23 ESV:
For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior.
1 Timothy 2:11-15 ESV :
Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. Yet she will be saved through childbearingâif they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.
Ephesians 5:22 ESV:
Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord.
Most Helpful Opinions
- 6K opinions shared on Other topic.
It's actually the other way around and, if you think about it from an evolutionary perspective, it becomes obvious. This is because females cannot have thousands of kids like men can so, unlike men who are not picky about the characteristics of women they will fuck, women are much more picky about choosing their mate... And women choose based on what man can do for her...
So, over hundreds of thousands of generations, men have become what women wanted them to be.
You mean "meant to" as in "in our nature"? Well, whether that's true or not is completely irrelevant, because humans have stopped long ago to do what nature "intended" them to do. Most of what we do goes against the nature of our ancestors, simply because our individual intelelct and emotions trump our instincts.
- 4.3K opinions shared on Other topic.
We're meant to "compliment" each other. Like men are better in some case and women better in other so they just need to help the other in what they're bad at.
-
That's a weird question. Technically as humans we serve no purpose. Nobody's purpose is to serve anyone.
What Girls & Guys Said
5
Opinion
17Opinion
-
The comments that argue with Bible verses or texts from the Koran are ridiculous. Before patriarchy existed, matriarchy was the norm. This is also very easy to explain. In the matriarchy, women had the leadership, but they did not rule âoverâ the men. There was no resistance to this form of society, because due to the empathy and emotional intelligence of which women have a little more (biologically based on the fact that they have more responsibility for the upbringing of their children), ensure that every individual is included, there are no quarrels and claims of ownership. It's a WE. Because when everyone is taken care of, you are taken care of too. This has worked for a very long time, longer than patriarchy has existed and will exist. Unfortunately, droughts, wars, shortages and violence put an end to this one day. Because when we are so focused on surviving, we act on survival instincts and there is no longer a WE. Nevertheless, the patriarchy is not justified. It takes a lot to keep women down. And the new religions were shaped to make women obedient and justify their submissive place, the laws made to make women dependent, marriage made to ensure every man had access to procreation. But that is not natural. Basically, people serve life. We are endowed with the drive to continue the reproduction and maintenance of our species. And the most successful method is when women are doing well. The people here arguing that the strong males in the animal kingdom just take or choose any female are very ill-informed. Animals in captivity or traumatized animals behave this way, but in the animal kingdom it is usually female choice. The female gender is more selective, the male gender is success-oriented. But the man hasn't achieved much if he's allowed to just take it all. Especially when the woman is traumatized by the man's violence and the offspring does not develop healthily as a result. In fact, stress can even cause the unborn child to fail.
So where is that natural when it comes to the preservation of the human species? Even animals have a natural instinct for it. It is not the females who want to please the males, but vice versa. They want to prove that they matter and are worthy of passing on their genes. There are various rituals in the animal kingdom. The male performs a mating dance, presents himself, the lion shows his mane, the male fish are shiny and usually much more colorful than the females. Male birds bring flowers to females, give them presents. The patriarchy has turned the tables and taken it to the extreme. The reason men so often believe women will dress up for them is because men want to please women and believe it must work the other way around as well. They don't know any different. It's a biological instinct. We've all been manipulated. We serve life, creation and femininity is the embodiment of creation as she can shape life. The first man is not "Adam". Strictly speaking, if we consider the birth of the child in the womb, it is "Eve". Before the child's sex is determined, it has a sort of vagina. This may change when the child becomes a boy. In addition, the woman has YY and the man only XY. This makes a very big difference, because the woman is biologically much better equipped than the man. The physical strength comes from the X because the body tries to make up for the missing Y since it is biologically weaker than the woman. Hence the physical strength. It's for balance. Therefore, when men are ill, they suffer more and are more at risk. It's not just a cliché. Men also die earlier. But today it doesn't really matter what is natural. It is important that we understand and care for each other. It is important that both parties surrender, love, serve and align themselves with a WE.
The fact is: If women were created to serve men, they would not question it, would not fight it and would not want to change it and in fact have already changed it. Then there would never have been anything other than patriarchy and we wouldn't feel as bad or even "inferior" as you write with this thought. Your biology tells you that's not true. And biology will always prevail more than any religion that emerged from the egoistic male brains of the time. Psychologically, men are even more likely to feel inferior or they wouldn't insist on women being below them. Holding someone down or even using violence is always an indication that you are feeling weak or threatened.
I hope this helps you. -
Nope they are created to complete men , their's no gender superior to the other one , we are completing each other
-
Relationships are best when both parties make the decision to serve each other.
You gotta invest in the relationship. If all you do is make withdrawals then it can't possibly work. - 821 opinions shared on Other topic.
If itâs mutual itâs fine. Relationships should not be one sided.
Some guys act like slaves to women & thatâs wrong too - 842 opinions shared on Other topic.
Women don't have any purpose other than to be self serving individuals.
-
I think that both genders can be meant serve each other.
- 785 opinions shared on Other topic.
No but if you actually belive that you should probably check out bdsm when your old enough
-
Women are meant two serve women and men are meant two serve men
Sexually. :) -
God created women so that they would serve men
1 Corinthians 11:9 -
Lol. Woman is the column of the family, who don't appreciate it, is dump person.
- 2K opinions shared on Other topic.
Please don't be so ridiculous. Thank You.
-
I think both should serve eachother :)
- 659 opinions shared on Other topic.
No. Women and men are supposed to be a team
- 1.4K opinions shared on Other topic.
fuck that, I only serve myself
-
No that sounds like Donald trumps thype of thing
- 1K opinions shared on Other topic.
can u explain more?
- 598 opinions shared on Other topic.
Hell no
- 363 opinions shared on Other topic.
Nope
- 1.5K opinions shared on Other topic.
Nope. Absolutely not
-
HELL NO!
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions