NO! Here's what happened when we had an edit option: A troll posts a question "do you think this girl is pretty?" and it's a drop-dead gorgeous girl. So guys post comments about how hot she is and what they'd like to do with her body, and then the original Asker "edits" the question and substitutes a picture of an obvious male cross-dresser.
@Grond21 It would, but Admin could respond that simple proofreading by users before hitting the "Submit" button would accomplish the same thing. I try to proofread before submitting but I certainly don't always remember to do that.
@Grond21 It's like we are saying that we are not responsible, we want to remain irresponsible, and can Admin to please help us to clean up all the messes we create.
No, I don't think having typos or autocorrect issues is somehow irresponsible. I think that is setting a standard of perfection that most people have no interest nor inclination to reach. And therefore it is ignoring the target audience
@Grond21 No, I don't think having typos or autocorrect issues is somehow irresponsible, either. I think that failing to proofread what you have written before you sbmt it is irresponsible.
I suspect that we will never agree on this subject. I am conservative and I place an emphasis on individual responsibility and individual freedoms. You are liberal and you don't want to bear rsponsibility for your actions; you want someone else to bail you out. That is one of the fundamental differences between the right and the left.
... Hmm. On this issue, in terms of the right way to run a business that is an online chat forum, you are correct. We will not agree. In terms of personal responsibility, I agree that it is important for each of us to have the personal responsibility to proofread and check our own messages. However that has no bearing on how the business should be run.
Finally, I am also on the right. I am not a liberal. Your assumption in this case, and your following accusations, are pure conjecture and just come across as pretentious
