Who was actually better: Mike Tyson or Lennox Lewis?

[Oliverlogan263]

Who do you think was the actual better boxer?

They had that legendary match in 2002 where Lennox Lewis won, but Mike Tyson wasn't consistently having matches at that time. Compared to the 80s and early 90s, he wasn't so much "in his prime."

Lennox Lewis was technically in his prime since his prime ranged from mid-1990s to early 2000s.

I'm watching the match now actually on YouTube and wanted to ask what people think about this.

Mike Tyson's record is 50 wins, 6 losses, and 2 no contests. 44 wins from knockouts.

Lennox Lewis's record is 41 wins, 2 losses, and one draw. 32 wins by knockout.

On another note, what do you think about Mike Tyson going against Jake Paul? Do you think he has what it takes?

What would you think would happen if Lennox Lewis decided to train again and want a match with Jake Paul?

And who would you say was better in their prime: Mike Tyson, Muhammad Ali, or Lennox Lewis?

Mike Tyson

Lennox Lewis

[AviatorTom]

Tyson was practically unstoppable, better than Lewis.

[Anonymous]

Lewis is one year older than Tyson, and he still won the match.

He also defeated Holyfield, Mike couldn't do it.

[Opinion Owner]

Thanks for the MHO

[Anonymous]

Lewis defeated Tyson, but he also defeated Holyfield, who as well defeated Mike, so I think Lennox was better.

[Opinion Owner]

Also, Muhammad Ali was the best in his prime.

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

Mike Tyson