Dozens of people showed interest but only 4 people participate in remote viewing. With such a small number of samples it is meaningless to try finding a trend but the predictions leaned slightly toward Auckland winning against Saudi Arabia today. Which is statistically unlikely, they have a 10% chance. So most likely the prediction is off, misinterpreted, all the participants only remote viewed for the first time in their lives. Which is fine if only i had more participants. What if i pay you to remote view random generated images? We do not remote view the event. The remote viewer is clueless what they are viewing, they just get a number coordinate that is attached to a random image (e. g. a camel) which is attached to the team that wins the game and whichever team wins, that picture is showed to the remote viewer. So you are using precognition to remote view your own future revelation of the target: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrwAiU2g5RU
Al Ahli are ranked 79th in fhe world.
Auckland 330th.
But my small team of first-attempt psychics have a trend toward the Auckland. Which pays out 8.5x of what you bet, last i checked.
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
0Opinion
Witchcraft is almost as ridiculous as Christianity.
I know i am exaggerating
I built a website that already was better than any other published tool but it had a flaw.
See, i assigned 3 images to a number coordinate and routed each to an outcome (team 1, team 2, draw)
And asked a group of volunteers to remote view their own future of what they will see when i reveal a picture labeled with this number coordinate.
What they described, all except one strongly matched the picture that I associated with the tram that i wanted to win (but it lost).
But one described a picture that strongly, literally was the exact scene belonging to the team that actually won. Written and drawn. So precise as if he actually saw the picture. And it won.
Nobody drew anything that didn't match either of the two. Nobody drew a picture that matched the draw.
So my next step is to modify the website to have ai choose the pictures so that i never see the wrong team... oh shit, wait, i still will have to compare them to each drawing to know who to bet on, right?
But if i see them then the remote viewers will remote view me seeing it. I suppose i could use ai to judge the images and decide which one each resembles.
Looks like a document from 1986 concluded the same as i already did
But i did it alone in the past, where acomputer judged my prediction. Now i did it with a group where humans judge. Next is to do it in a group where computer is the judge.