Polls

It's been awhile since we had a fun and interesting geography quiz.

In this quiz, the skylines of 3 cities are shown below. The Question: Which of these cities is the farthest North?

To make it interesting, you first have to figure out what the 3 cities are from the pictures, and then decide which is farthest North.

Please give your answer by voting in the poll.

Best of luck!

Correct answer will be given in a few days (Sunday).

Especially when compared next to a woman's legs?

I'm conflicted about it. I feel like life was simpler by necessity when the fastest route of transportation on land was a horse.

I think auto locks are a stupid invention. I get the idea behind them, but I actually think they have the opposite effect. I want to determine whether or not the door gets locked! I don’t want that determined for me!!!

Have one election, no primaries, and the top vote-getters go to Washington as the state’s representatives. It would result in wildly more diverse delegations, more moderates representing a wider range of ages, races and political beliefs than we have in Congress.

Rural voters wouldn’t lose “their” representatives under this system any more than urban voters would. In fact, all voters would be more represented, not less. For example, each Pennsylvanian would go from having three representatives to having 19. And each member could cultivate a statewide constituency based on political orientation, social beliefs and moral reasoning rather than geography.

Electing all the representatives at large would make all the districts in each state the same size. More important, it would end the redistricting wars that bedevil us only after the census but now seem destined to become a permanent & ugly fixture of American politics.

If each state chose its representatives in a single statewide election, the result would be a House of Representatives truly representative of the people. Smaller parties would finally stand a chance of winning a seat at the table. The two major parties would be forced to enter coalitions, which would require compromise and moderation — qualities sorely lacking.

Critics will insist that the House is no place for the 17th-place finisher. Perhaps. But could the resulting Congress be any more dysfunctional than the current one?

A single-vote, winners-take-all system would remove party politics and geography from the process. Representatives would represent people with shared ideologies, not some artificially constructed “district” where half the voters feel their representative is not representative of their beliefs.

For example, there aren’t enough socialists or libertarians in any one congressional district in PA to win a seat. But maybe there are enough socialists or libertarians statewide to enable a candidate to finish in the top 17.

If so, which character (s)?

Im not trying to troll lol

Everyone says it stinks, and apparantly I'm the only person who didn't smell this nausiating stench, only very briefly when pulling in by train.

I was there in October