Polls

If law and order broke down these are the types of people who would murder you to survive..

Out of genuine curiosity, To the people that associate themselves more with the political left, what is your general perception of a conservative?

To the people that associate themselves with the political right, what is your perception of a liberal?

And which way do you lean on most issues?

So as an adjective the term “weird” doesn’t sound too bad:

suggesting something supernatural; uncanny.
"the weird crying of a seal"

But as a verb the definition of “weird” sounds really bad:

induce a sense of disbelief or alienation in someone. Example: "blue eyes weirded him out, and Ivan's were especially creepy"

Anyway I guess it all comes to down whether you find a person unpredictable or not to label them “weird”.

So say for example you see some creepy looking stranger walking down the road muttering “weird” things and making odd gestures then that’s obviously bad weird. He might not be actively doing anything wrong/criminal. But he puts people on edge nonetheless.

However what about seeing a talented yet bizarre musician perform or getting into a conversation with interesting yet very eccentric conspiracy theorist. These are “cool” weird people. Their strange and uncanny but they aren’t threatening.
They are highly unorthodox so it’s not something you see everyday. Maybe their crazy, maybe their geniuses or maybe both. But they keep things interesting from time to time.

Yet those bizarre (yet harmless) people still get labeled “weird” just like the creepy guy walking down the street gets called “weird”.

Anyway from my observations women typically have a much more negative definition of “weird” then men do. They see “weird” as more threatening.

Not attacking either political side when it comes to this idea. This is an open ended non-partisan question.

Anyway I would absolutely love to see JD Vance debate Kamala Harris and Tim Walz debate Donald Trump.

This would be a very badly needed and informative vantage point for American voters to better analyze VPs/presidential candidates. Reason being it would be much more challenging for all the candidates to prepare for their opponents which is a good thing. It would force candidates to think fast on the spot. Get the truth out.

The VP would likely be the aggressor given they can criticize the presidential candidate given they are the ultimate decision makers when it comes to policy. Also the VP would have to defend their own running mates with the opposing presidential candidate’s criticism. It would be like a hostile & unpredictable interview but not necessarily a fist fight.

It would also give more attention and prominence to the VP’s role, abilities and personality. The VP is after all just one gun shot, heart attack, etc. from being the president of the United States.

If both sides could agree to two debates (and maybe do a coin toss on which match up goes first) it be so much better for the American voter. Because it would expose more strengths and weakness of all the candidates. Give a much better picture of what the American voter is really buying.

Anyway I posted this as a non-partisan question. Please avoid attacking Trump, Kamala, etc right off the bat. However I would love to see this and I imagine so would most other people.

Walking is my main form of exercise. I am always walking around. Is it okay if I walk by my new girlfriend's apartment whenever I want to see if she is outside and talk to her? I am not going to knock on the door if she is not outside. And I don't mean every day. Maybe I'll walk by 1-2 times a week.

He is just sitting on the curb outside the gate of my apartment complex. It is like 11PM at night.

If I call it in as a suspicious person, will that give law enforcement the right to detain and check ID? Maybe he will be deported. Who knows.

I think if this strike lasts more than two weeks , Trump is President #47 .

Full List of Republicans Who Voted AGAINST FEMA Relief 2 Days Before Hurricane Helene Made Landfall IN THEIR OWN STATES!!

All Democrats voted YES

North Carolina:
Representative Dan Bishop, NC 8th District
Senator Ted Budd

South Carolina:
Representative Jeff Duncan, SC 3rd District
Representative Russell Fry, SC 7th District
Representative Nancy Mace, SC 1st District
Representative Ralph Norman, SC 5th District
Representative William R. Timmons IV, SC 4th District
Senator Tim Scott

Georgia:
Representative Richard McCormick, GA 6th District
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, GA 14th District
Representative Mike Collins, GA 10th District
Representative Andrew S. Clyde, GA 9th District

Florida:
Representative Daniel Webster, FL 11th District
Representative Michael Waltz, FL 6th District
Representative Bill Posey, FL 8th District
Representative Cory Mills, FL 7th District
Representative Anna Paulina Luna, FL 13th District
Representative Laurel M. Lee, FL 15th District
Representative Matt Gaetz, FL 11th District
Representative Bryon Donalds, FL 1st District
Representative Kat Cammack, FL 3rd District
Representative Gus M. Bilirakis, FL 12th District
Representative Aaron Bean, FL 4th District
Senator Rick Scott refused to vote

Tennessee:
Representative Tim Burchett, TN 2nd District
Representative Andrew Ogles, TN 5th District
Representative John W. Rose, TN 6th District
Senator Marsha Blackburn
Senator Bill Hagerty

As an personal aside, I am still LIVID 12 years later over the Republican Party—particularly the House—concerned that spending on disaster relief is offset by cutting costs elsewhere. @ 200 House Republicans voted against emergency relief after Superstorm Sandy ravaged much of the New York Area and the Northeast in 2012.
My students & neighbors were homeless! Our school was an island in a lake! My fam & I delivered 1000s of meals to people. We had no electric for 12 days - others 36 days, no ⛽, jammed cell phone lines, food & water shortages.

The US is producing record amounts of fossil fuels right now, but he's going to open up more federal lands to drilling and fracking, and he says that'll cut engery prices by 50% within a year.