Polls

Like to confirm, make sure you're still interested, some people would want you to communicate in-between

Google was found last week to have violated antitrust law by illegally maintaining a monopoly in internet search. Now discussions over how to fix those violations have begun.

Justice Department officials are considering what remedies to ask a federal judge to order against the search giant, said three people with knowledge of the deliberations involving the agency and state attorneys general who helped to bring the case. They are discussing various proposals, including breaking off parts of Google, such as its Chrome browser or Android smartphone operating system, two of the people said.

Other scenarios under consideration include forcing Google to make its data available to rivals, or mandating that it abandon deals that made its search engine the default option on devices like the iPhone, said the people, who declined to be identified because the process is confidential. The government is meeting with other companies and experts to discuss their proposals for limiting Google’s power, the people said.

The deliberations are in their early stages. Judge Amit P. Mehta of U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia has asked the

Google’s competitors and other critics have proposed — either publicly or in discussions with the government — several options for how Judge Mehta should rein in the company.

The most extreme is for Google to split off a substantial part of its business. That could mean the company would have to spin off Chrome, its web browser, or Android, its software for smartphones. Both of those products use Google as the automatic search engine, which helps fuel the company’s dominance, Judge Mehta said.

The government is also considering asking for Google to have to divest a tool that runs text ads in search, the two people with knowledge of the deliberations said.

Do you think she will truthfully certify the election results?

VP Kamala Harris can certify the election results even if she’s a presidential candidate
- The vice president can still oversee the counting of Electoral College votes if they are a presidential candidate. It’s happened multiple times throughout history. - www.verifythis.com/.../536-6eb8fc15-c36f-4ca9-87c3-376a2e16442a

Do you think Harris will assume the presidency before Biden finishes the end of his term?

Do you think Harris assuming the presidency before Biden finishes his term will help or hurt her chances at re-election?

Do you want such a horrible woman as the first female president?

Sen. Cruz Predicts Harris Will Assume Presidency Before Biden's Term Ends
'I think if they can bully Joe Biden into doing it, it’ll happen' - scnr.com/.../sen-cruz-predicts-harris-will-assume-presidency-before-bidens-term-ends_0663867e5a0f11ef9c930242ac1c0002

Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. Why the hell is selling fucking illegal?

Would you trust Donald Trump with your wallet?

Would you trust him alone with your daughter?

You know just in case that rare rare instance happens where you gotta make your exit quickly perhaps. or just noting anything somewhat peculiar?

Look at Selena Gomez and Taylor Swift. 32 and 34. Both very wealthy and highly successful. Both are unmarried and have no kids. Failures.

What’s the point in being successful if you lose your fundamental life purpose which is having kids, a husband and a family.

They are also involved in woke/feminist agendas (evil).

Another reason why is that they need to find a man so high up to the point they can respect him. That’s how women work. They can’t respect a man who doesn’t have 100s of millions like them.

This is why success is bad for women. Like what’s the point of being successful without kids.