Why is there "existence" everywhere but no absolute nothingness? ?

[MonicaWills]

Our existence in the universe is too random and incomprehensible to describe in words. We live in a world that takes human existence for granted—but there comes a time when you step out of human arrogance into thinking about what it means to be human, and you ask: Why is there nothing in the universe "Substance" everywhere? Why can such a large universe be restrained by some very precise laws and laws? Why do spiral nebula, Northern Lights, SpongeBob SquarePants, and Boss Ruffian exist in the universe we live in at the same time? Cosmologist Sean Carroll notes, "There is nothing in modern physics that explains why we use the laws of physics that we use, but now we often hear physicists say—'If we were thinking about philosophers then maybe There will be no such mistakes'." Philosophers have come up with an "anthropic principle" to deal with such problems—in short, it is the existence of human beings that can Explain the properties of our universe, including the fundamental constants of nature. Because if the universe were not like this, there would be no intelligent beings like us talking about it. The universe was created for the observer—a concept that many scientists "don't like."

[NamerOfStars]

"Randomness" does not exist; a pattern is no less of a pattern simply because you don't see it (ask an autist!). Science and mathematics are not the underlying laws that govern the universe; they are a human attempt to map those laws. And nothing in those laws prevents the creation of "spiral nebula, Northern Lights, SpongeBob SquarePants, and Boss Ruffian", so it's possible for them to exist- and at the current time, they do.

If you're asking why those laws exist at all, well, as a system grows increasingly large and increasingly complex, keeping it functioning as intended requires more and more complex rules and regulations; just look at the US tax code.

If you're asking why anything exists, then I'd counter with another question: why do you assume nonexistence is the natural state of a given thing? If you behold a cup full of water, it's reasonable to ask where the water came from, because you know that cups are made without water in them- their natural state is to be empty. This is why you do not ask of an empty cup "where did the water in it go?". But you don't know that of the universe- you simply assume it. What is there that would PREVENT the existence of the universe?

[Guy13]

Not sure exactly where you are going but some of your phraseology is confounding. There is Nothing in the universe because there is Something. Since there is Something of an Intelligent and Moral Design now then there has ALWAYS been Something.

In other words, never was there not Something. The remaining question being what is, how, who, and when Something? Now, philosophy….

[Chazmatazz269]

Humans have yet to develop a way to prove nothingness in a meaningful way. Our perception of evidence demands existence. There are scientific and mathematical terms for identifying this otherwise irrefutable reality. The “proving the negative” paradox, for example. At no time in human history has anyone ever proven that something doesn’t exist. All that has ever been done instead was proving that something that we know exists isn’t actually what we previously thought it was. This will likely always be the case.

[OfDeath]

Nobody knows the answer to that question. The fine tuning argument is also a non sequitur. Just because the laws of physics are as such, doesn't mean they were made that way by a being. What were the laws which governed that being?

How do physical constants arise? Can physical constants be changed? If so, how?

These are the real questions.

All we know is we must be in the reality which allows for us.

[Berethor]

Didn't you want to ask why there seems to be no life in other planets? why humans so alone?

https://www.youtube.com/embed/jMYIl5b-paY

[LiamJHayden]

Absolute nothingness cannot be perceived or measured. If it could, it would be something.

[MiamiMadness]

I remember the first time I did shrooms too

[Sun_Kim-Ai]

Alright.

[MonicaWills]

You don't seem to like it?

[Sun_Kim-Ai]

No, I am alright with it.
It was a statement and I found it interesting.
If it's a problem I can remove your follow and my opinion.

[MonicaWills]

Hahaha because you just sent :Alright. I thought you thought differently, but it was interesting. Thank you.

[Sun_Kim-Ai]

I prefer using one-word answers when I can.