Search Results: abortion facts

Was watching Michael Moore's documentary "Where to Invade Next" which has a long section on female leadership in other countries. It blamed men for the economic meltdown of 2008, pointing out that one European bank which didn't lose any money at all was managed totally by women. This, it says, shows that male leaders have too much testosterone leading them to do dumb and risky things.

I don't dispute these facts to a degree and would welcome a female president, provided she is the best PERSON for the job. But the way this film gushed over and focused only on women's good points -- how they see the world in a totally different and superior way -- seemed almost to deify them. Like if only men would step aside and women would take over, we'd have none of the problems we have today.


Wouldn't the world under female leadership still have problems? Already we can see that as women have asserted more influence, there's been a corresponding push toward free government-funded abortions, excessive political correctness, egregious violations of free speech, the assumption of guilt in any college rape accusation, an effort to eliminate risk in every sphere (to the point of dismantling "unsafe" playgrounds, banning the game of tag, Prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s, etc), the feminist/SJW culture of being offended by everything, and an education system tailored to girls' needs and learning style at the expense of boys. These are mostly bad things and I doubt they are coming from men. They may seem trivial compared to wars over oil but have the potential to produce a very oppressive society in the future where "wrong" ideas and thoughts are severely punished.

By this point, many countries have had female presidents, with mixed results, same as with male presidents. In fact the female presidents of Brazil and the Philippines only proved that female leaders can be just as corrupt as men. But what do you think? Would the world be better if women ruled it?