Search Results: is she playing games

With social media like instagram. You’re never going to feel rich, pretty, handsome, tall enough. There’s always just too many people with more. It’s quite overwhelming how our society has become so depressing.

People are conscious to it but subconsciously they believe it all, like women expect all these unrealistic things. You see from what they like. I think it also makes a lot of men out there want to give up on playing a game you can’t win.

People want the rare thing, rare for a woman used to be like 1in20 guys, now it’s like 1in2000 guys because of all this abundance of people. 2/3 men are single 18-30.

On one hand it has helped motivate me a lot to keep moving forward.

You never will be pretty, handsome, rich, jacked enough. There’s always gonna be more than you no matter what.

This is why you find plain average chicks saying they need a man earning millions a year. You’re playing a game you can’t win at all. Because women believe it all.

There’s a good side, like it pushes you to do more and to be better and self improve however.

My point is, you might be the best in your city, you won’t feel that way when you view instagram.

FYI The "American Forces Network" online will show you what's playing worldwide if you want to see for yourself.

Now, first I realize it's VITALLY IMPORTANT that troops get news from home - it makes them less homesick and provides a sense of normalcy when you hear the Yankees collapsed in 5 games (Let's Go Mets)!

But should they be getting news from a network where the following happened:

"The hosts “have open access to spread their conspiracy theories to US troops,” VoteVet states. “And now we know they knew they were lies — just to boost their ratings in referencing Fox settlement of the Dominion Voting lawsuit of libel $800K for their "knowingly false claims".

In fact, Fox Broadcasting Company, LLC is a USA commercial broadcast television network owned by the Fox Entertainment division of Fox Corporation. As such, it avoids the stricter standards required of other journalism outlets.

In fact, during the lawsuit Fox Attorneys stated in the record:

The 'general tenor' of the show should inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

The Trump appointed judge then states: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

She added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable as they are entertainment.

The decision specifically references Fox News prime-time hosts Laura Ingraham, Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity, each of whom was accused in recent court filings of knowingly spreading Donald Trump's false claims of 2020 election fraud.

So, should troops be watching "entertainment" as news? Purveyors of false claims, lies, misinfo & disinfo per the courts?