Why do a lot of women care more about social stories and less about how anything works?

For example choosing an interest in gossip, autobiographies, and celebrity lives.
Or books, movies, games and tv about regular everyday lives where nothing fantastical or exciting happens. Or social hierarchies and interactions and how people they never met feel.
Or what their neighbors or classmates or coworkers are doing on their free time, etc.

By contrast its more likely for men to be interested in things that involve understanding or mastering something, or experiencing excitement.
Things like science, technology, natural history, war history, and product history.
Or fantasy and sci-fi action video games/movies/tv.
Or sports, or drawing/painting, composing music, playing an instrument, building things, taking things apart, etc.

The former is a deep interest in the mundane, and the latter is disatisfaction with it and striving for greater excitement. So really the question is "why are so many women not bored by the mundane? While so many men strive for experiencing the extraordinary?
Yes there are exceptions, but why are they exceptions and not the norm?

Updates
1 y
No one seems to understand the question, and is just rewording or detailing what I said in a different way, or arguing perspectives based on opinions, rather based on objective observations of how many women and men prefer X or Y things.
Those types of answers will get deleted, as they are a different conversation than the question's topic.
People are not programmable by advertizing, and saying what most women or men prefer does not explain WHY they prefer it, and is therefor not an answer.
Why do a lot of women care more about social stories and less about how anything works?
Post Opinion