Search Results: turning him away

for decades, entire generations of boys were raised to be soft, to never stand up for themselves against someone "less privileged" than them, to be as far away from toxic masculinity as possible

then over time everyone and their grandpa can observe women chasing after bad boys, doesn't matter whether they're a godly Christian woman or a hardcore Marxist feminist

you would think with all this complaining about toxic masculinity, that women especially feminists would want nothing to do with it at all

no amount of gaslighting can cover up what everyone can blatantly see with their own eyes, yes there here women complaining about Charlie Kirk being a douchebag while they lust after Hasan Piker who's a far bigger douchebag than Charlie Kirk could ever dream of becoming

the examples there are of this are so overwhelming it's laughable to suggest otherwise. in fact having the appearance of someone toxically masculine is already enough to get women wet

this also further bleeds into politics too with so many examples of far-left women defending the far-right politics of other ethnicities

and in recent years cops have become soft on crime due to feminist policies but you know what happens to soft cops and who's ready to defund these soft cops?

then there's also countless examples in fiction I don't even know where to begin

women falling for toxic masculine men is just a fact at this point

I could post more if not for the 2000 character limits

Gift article - no paywall

https://wapo.st/460F7O0

IRS says churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

The IRS said in a new court filing that clergy and houses of worship should be allowed to make political endorsements, a potential move away from a 71-year-old tax policy that curtailed the fusing of religion and politics.

Banning tax-exempt nonprofits — including congregations — from participating in political campaigns violates the First Amendment’s protection of the right to the free exercise of religion and freedom of speech, IRS Commissioner Billy Long said in a court filing Monday in a Texas federal court case.

Nonprofits should be allowed to make political endorsements and not lose their tax exemptions, the IRS said in the court filing. Religious congregations, the filing said, are like families, and their internal communications should not be deemed “participation” in a campaign.

“When a house of worship in good faith speaks to its congregation, through its customary channels of communication on matters of faith in connection with religious services, concerning electoral politics viewed through the lens of religious faith, it neither ‘participate[s]’ nor ‘intervene[s]’ in a ‘political campaign,’” according to the filing.

“First Amendment rights don’t end when a pastor, church member or even a political candidate steps on the platform of a church,”.

Others said changing the policy would further pollute U. S. politics.

“Permitting synagogues and other houses of worship to endorse or oppose candidates undercuts the integrity and unity of these religious institutions, turning them into an extension of political candidates or parties,”

“This decision fails to recognize the realities of modern spiritual life and could expose clergy, including rabbis and cantors, to unjust scrutiny as they fulfill their sacred duty to teach, guide, and inspire,” the statement said.