Search Results: will I hear from her

Obviously it's common courtesy to put the toilet seat down when you are in the dwelling of or share a dwelling with a woman, as the female to male ratio increases even more so. Trust me I have gotten bonked before for not doing so.

The often cited reason I hear to do this is to prevent women from falling into the toilet, the seat being the thin white circle saving them from a catastrophe.

However, this explanation never made sense to me because it's such an obvious thing to avoid. Unless drunk there really is no excuse to diving your behind onto a toilet without looking first. On that, even at night your eyes have adjusted and a toilet outline is quite visible whether it's up or down, and I say this as someone who has Lasik surgery and thus suffers with night vision. Lastly in my experience it's easy to just touch whether the seat is up or down based on the cover because with a seat up it will have a noise from the seat and cover tapping against each other.

So really other than laziness, the actual issue in my view is that it isn't courteous to the women. This should suffice on my own in my opinion because unless it's a real issue the toilet dunks sound more like a scary story to warn inattentive men of their inactions.
I have to lift the seat up to only pee and obviously check for that so I don't piss on the seat, so I fail to see how this logic can't be applied in reverse.

As an experiment this year I've been leaving the toilet cover down as well as the seat to see if I got complaints and so far none have sufficed.

So girls how often does this toilet bowl bottom exchange with a lifted seat actually happen? In occurrences that it did was it from assuming and committing to the squat or a genuine mistake?

I'm so curious about this. Full disclosure I consider myself a "left facing pragmatist." Which basically means I would be indistinguishable from a "right facing pragmatist" apart from the direction I would like to move in.

But anyway, I'm sure everyone has heard by now of the Israel Palestine conflict. Minutes after the opening salvo pretty much the entire right wing was trying to blame Biden (of course, who else) for giving Iran 6 billion dollars. That was a lie, as the 6 billion to which they refer was actually Iran's own money. But instead of backing off the doubled down and insisted that being able to use 6 billion for one thing freed up 6 billion for attacks. So naturally it is now being reported that Iran never got the monet and in fact it's being frozen.

Don't right wingers feel even a little bit mad that they were lied to? And to be fair the outrage may very well be part of the reason Biden thought to have the 6 billion frozen, but that could have been brought to his attention without lies. Because it seems the reason for the lies is because the benefit is it increases the chance of scoring political crits but the cost is nonexistent because right wing voters don't hold their liars accountable..

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/u-s-to-hold-off-on-disbursing-6-billion-in-iran-oil-revenue-unfrozen-in-prisoner-deal-4007cc51

It’s like a gift from the gods of political campaigning. Vote Dem or vote dictator.

I haven’t heard of this until @goaded posted about “red caesar”. I’m afraid, yet quite sure independents will hate this.

But I’ve been wrong before…