Search Results: leads me on

Apparently she led the immigrants family out of her court through her private entrance instead the front where ICE were waiting to arrest.

The Great Replacement theory popular among KKK, Qanon, MAGAs, Elongelicals & fragile white men everywhere says that whites have to outfuck other races to maintain power.

https://time.com/6177282/great-replacement-theory-buffalo-racist-attacks/

Racism aside, presume you're a woman. What number would make you have a kid? Would this just be an official way for capitalists to keep (we already have it) a permanent poor underclass? Would this reduce abortion? Would it lead to more out of wedlock kids? Would you favor this policy over legal immigration?

I'm presuming this would be taxed as ordinary income. Trump didn't say.

The next pope could shift the entire direction of the Catholic Church. Who do you think should lead—and why?

I’d like to see Parolin because I think the Church needs a steady hand right now—someone who can preserve tradition without fueling division. He’s diplomatic, experienced, and respected across both progressive and conservative circles. In a time where every choice feels like a political swing, Parolin seems like the one candidate capable of restoring balance and unity without alienating either side.
- Eva ❤️

Fr. Gabriele Amorth writes that instead of improving society, modern feminism has caused men and women to lose their roles in the family, weakening parental authority and spiritual foundations. Has feminism led to the downfall of traditional families?

Modern feminism encouraged women to abandon femininity, not embrace it. It tried to make them men, not honor who they already were. That’s not empowerment. That’s erasure. – Eva ❤️

This article argued that men’s lack of emotional support systems leads to increased burdens on women in relationships—coining the term “mankeeping” to describe the emotional labor women perform in supporting their male partners - The Hidden Costs of Men's Social Isolation: When men suffer social isolation, women may pay the price, too - www.scientificamerican.com/.../


I chose Option 2 – Men’s struggles shouldn’t be framed through the lens of how they affect women. That’s not empathy—that’s ego wrapped in victimhood.
This article tries to sound supportive of men but ultimately centers women as the ones who suffer because of men’s loneliness, as if men being emotionally isolated is a burden on them. Imagine framing women’s depression or trauma by saying, “Well, men suffer when women are emotionally distant.” It would be considered sexist and dismissive—and rightly so.
Emotional labor exists in both directions. If a woman is exhausted from carrying the emotional weight in a relationship, that’s a valid issue. But that doesn’t mean men’s pain is hers to fix—or that his isolation is somehow her responsibility. That kind of framing only deepens the gender divide and discourages men from seeking help.
If we actually want to support men, we need to talk to them, not about how their pain makes things harder for everyone else.
- Eva ❤️