Search Results: questions to ask

This is a question i never thought i would have to ask.. But in recent the trump team has assigned the removal of slavery history specifically the bad sides of it from national parks and museums.

www.washingtonpost.com/.../

While the depictions and evidence of the literal scars of slavery are being removed from museums and national public spaces. Trump's team supports renaming forts back to the people who were on the side of the confederacy... let me make this absolutely clear. The confederacy wanted to keep slavery legal. To support confederate members and its confederate flag, is a support for slavery. Yes I get that some people claim the confederate flag is a symbol for southern pride.. but be real, its for the support of slavery.

Reinstating confederate names to Places like
Fort Barfoot
instead of honoring a medal of honor recipient that has no ties to the confederacy they chose to name it after a confederate army general George Edward Pickett

Fort Eisenhower
being changed to Fort Gordon, instead of honoring Dwight D. Eisenhower a former president who didn't support slavery, they instead chose someone that supported the confederacy. However with respect to Gordon's accomplishments in the war. Still Gordon was on the side that supported slavery.

Fort Gregg Adams
The current trump team wants to rename it back to Fort Robert E Lee, a confederate general. It was named Fort Gregg Adams, for Lt. Gen Arthur Gregg and Lt. Col. Charity Adams accomplishments in the military and they didn't have ties to the confederacy.

But I think you get the point.
Why allow so much confederacy praising in an america that doesn't want slavery?

There have been a few questions lately on GaG about women wearing revealing clothes.

I'm not really sure what that means, everyone has their own fashion sense, so I asked both ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot AIs, and they each gave me the exact same set of pictures, shown above.

Do you consider these as "revealing clothes'?

If you say No, what would you consider to be revealing. Post a picture if you want.

Charlie Kirk Pleads the Fifth When Asked His Age by Jan. 6 Committee

The deposition of conservative activist Charlie Kirk with the January 6 committee on May 24 was a rather brief one, official documents revealed, as the Turning Point USA founder pleaded the Fifth Amendment to avoid responding to a range of questions from his age to his education level.

On Wednesday, the House committee investigating the attack on the Capitol by a mob of Trump supporters on January 6, 2021 released the transcript of its interview with Kirk, who, under oath, was questioned about his role in the riots and in casting doubt on the 2020 presidential election.

Kirk—like many others interviewed by the Jan. 6 committee—invoked his right against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to avoid responding to the panel's questions about his age, his highest level of education and his role in founding Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and its affiliate Turning Point Action (TPA), a conservative youth activist organization which the New York Times reported to be funded by conservative megadonors.

In response to all but one of the more than 70 questions the committee asked Kirk during the interview on May 24, the activist responded: "I am invoking my Fifth Amendment right."

The committee asked the conservative activist about his whereabouts on January 6, 2021 and whether he knew before news of the riots broke out that "something like that" could happen on the day. He took the Fifth.

A few days before the attack on the Capitol, Kirk wrote in a now-deleted tweet that TPA would be sending more than 80 buses of Trump supporters to Washington, D. C., to "fight for the president."

"The historic event will likely be one of the largest and most consequential in American history," Kirk tweeted. "The team at @TrumpStudents & Turning Point Action are honored to help make this happen, sending 80+ buses full of patriots to DC to fight for this president.