Search Results: weakness

I’ve seen many say things like we are expendable, we’re not allowed to show weakness, we’re not allowed to have mental health struggles. I think it’s absolutely ridiculous if I can be perfectly candid. Yes, people DO care about us. I have seen it in real life time and time again.

I'm very surprised, as all predictions I saw had concluded that it was a coin flip, with a slight edge to Harris. I've always viewed Harris as possibly the least electable candidate in a long time. She laughs at criticism, she doesn't have her own policies, she's immature, and she's a massive liar.

In the debate against Trump, her weakness was very apparent to anyone who pays attention to body language. Her only chance was retaining a little bit of the incumbent advantage, since she was part of the current administration.

Michigan, I was sure Trump had no chance, since Whitmer is so well liked there. Wisconsin was unlikely, but Pennsylvania was a possibility, since the governor split from the Democratic party over the Israel-Palestine conflict, by choosing Israel.

I figured Arizona and Georgia would learn from their mistakes, and go back to being red, so I wasn't surprised there. And Texas, my home state, one has to be delusional, or on serious drugs to think they'd vote blue, so no surprise there, either.

I was shocked that Trump nearly took Virginia, and he took every swing state, including Nevada. The prediction I would've made, if I'd been told 4 years ago came true. Kamala Harris is just about the worst possible candidate in American history, and Trump would crush her easily. And that's exactly how it played out, he even took the popular vote. I'm very happy with the results, and I'm hopeful for the future of America with Trump as our president once again.

Were you surprised?

Aside from showing the desperation of Putin by recruiting North Korean troops, if they deploy to Ukraine that is a VERY DANGEROUS escalation as DefSec has said they are "fair game" for Ukrainian troops using USA provided weapons.

Given this "Murphy's Law" scenario, should the US stop arming Ukraine?

Trump has been having private conversations with Putin; do you think he got advance notice on this issue?

DoD leaks say USA fears that China will invade Taiwan while everyone is busy in Ukraine. Do you see that as a real possibility?

DoD leaks also fear that Israel will exploit the situation to annex the occupied territories and/or use the distraction to REALLY fuck up Iran. Do you see that as a real possibility?

Trump has been having private conversations with Putin. Is it possible that Trump & Putin will make this the "October surprise"?

If Putin needs NK troops does that signal a fatal weakness & Russia will likely walk away shamed & decimated with nothing to show but failure & Ukraine quickly joins NATO or the EU or both?

If North Korean troops deploy to Ukraine, is it time for Zelensky to make peace with Russia given NKs manpower & weaponry?

www.foxnews.com/world/north-korea-has-sent-troops-russia-pentagon-confirms.amp

Not attacking either political side when it comes to this idea. This is an open ended non-partisan question.

Anyway I would absolutely love to see JD Vance debate Kamala Harris and Tim Walz debate Donald Trump.

This would be a very badly needed and informative vantage point for American voters to better analyze VPs/presidential candidates. Reason being it would be much more challenging for all the candidates to prepare for their opponents which is a good thing. It would force candidates to think fast on the spot. Get the truth out.

The VP would likely be the aggressor given they can criticize the presidential candidate given they are the ultimate decision makers when it comes to policy. Also the VP would have to defend their own running mates with the opposing presidential candidate’s criticism. It would be like a hostile & unpredictable interview but not necessarily a fist fight.

It would also give more attention and prominence to the VP’s role, abilities and personality. The VP is after all just one gun shot, heart attack, etc. from being the president of the United States.

If both sides could agree to two debates (and maybe do a coin toss on which match up goes first) it be so much better for the American voter. Because it would expose more strengths and weakness of all the candidates. Give a much better picture of what the American voter is really buying.

Anyway I posted this as a non-partisan question. Please avoid attacking Trump, Kamala, etc right off the bat. However I would love to see this and I imagine so would most other people.