Search Results: physical turn offs

I have dated a few women who were quite beautiful. One looked like Suzanne Somers in her "Three's Company" days.

She was much easier to look at, but not a better girlfriend than some of the others. I have dated a few women who were on the lower end of the scale. One of them was a great match in many, many ways, but was probably what most guys would rate a 3/10. Despite that, I was very happy with her and very attracted to her, but. . . she never fell in love with me and I eventually broke up with her.

I have learned that I can love someone who is not particularly pretty and, if I am in love, I will lust for them just as much as I would lust for a Hollywood star. There are still some women whose physical appearance would be an instant turn off but I would not hesitate to date a woman who was "average" or even "below average" if I thought her other qualities were good.

How far down the scale of 1-10 would you accept if the person's other qualities were "just what you were looking for?"

1 candidate advances. Offenses (school or criminal) committed as a minor are fair game. All that is required is GED or High School Diploma. Alicia (now 30) shoplifted twice when she was 14, once for a video game and the 2nd one for food. She got pregnant and dropped out of school. However, when she turned 18, she earned her GED, joined the Army, got a 2 year degree while in the Army and received an Honorable Discharge. After 4 years in the Army (no combat deployment but stationed in Germany), she worked at Amazon for 3 years. At Amazon, she walked off the job with no warning because the boss made her mad. She got a job at another warehouse and stayed there for 5 years with no incidents other than 2 speeding tickets. Her credit score is 650 but all her bills were paid on time. Jamarcus (now 28) got expelled from high school for fighting too many times (fist, no weapons). However, while homeschooled, he earned a GED and went on to get a 4 year degree. Absolutely no trouble with the law (not even a speeding ticket). He made the right choices and has a credit score of 680+. Jonathan (now 30 years old) served 8 years in the Marines (2 combat deployments, 6 years in the U. S.). He has shrapnel stuck in his calf and got medically discharged (Honorable Discharge) but can pass the police physical with no problems. He was unemployed from ages 26-28. He started working at walmart at 28 and is still there. He has 3 speeding tickets but no other legal issues, even as a juvenile. Elizabeth (now 25) has absolutely no legal offenses (including tickets). She did not go to school or have a job (her parents support her). She volunteered at her church and can speak Spanish as well as a native speaker. All 4 candidates were honest about everything. All 4 passed medical, psych and the physical fitness test. On the fitness test, Elizabeth broke records out of all candidates who ever took the test, with the other 3 right behind her. All 4 seem like good choices. Who do you choose and why?

This is hardly confirmation that men are highly insecure and intimidated by an intelligent woman. I can't believe they spent money on this so they could figure out what weve all known since cavemen times that men want to have sex with hot women.

Quote from article and link below.

"Men are not attracted to intelligent women unless they are good looking, a study has found.
New research has confirmed the commonly held notion that the smarter a woman is, the less likely it is a man will fancy her.
Men are actively turned-off by cleverness, and the only exception to this is if the woman is highly attractive, a study by the Warsaw School of Economics found."

"But they discovered men placed more emphasis on physical appearance."

www.independent.co.uk/.../...autiful-a7176051.html