So basically the pizza gate conspiracy is a conspiracy that all the high up famous people and celebrities are part of a child pedophelia trafficking ring. People like Hillary Clinton, bill clinton, Donald trump, Obama, Katy Perry, Jeffrey Epstein and sooooo many more Hollywood celebrities. It sounds crazy but if you do some digging and watch documentaries like “fall of cabal” and “out of shadows official” you see some pretty hard evidence about how pizza gate could actually be real. There’s just so much evidence if you actually look into and dig deep. It also talks about andrechrome, I would also suggest doing some digging into andrechrome. But if you really wanna know about it watch “fall of cabal” and “out of shadows official” on YouTube, it explains it really well. Of course this all could just be a stupid conspiracy but I actually find it fascinating and not that far fetched. I’d recommend looking into it.
Updates
+1 y
Again it’s just a conspiracy theory, I’m not saying it’s real and my explanation is not the best.
What do you think about the pizza gate conspiracy?
Post Opinion
24 Opinion
Like
Share
Follow
What is your opinion?
Add Opinion
Most Helpful Opinions
Anonymous
(45 Plus)
+1 y
This may come as a shock to many but the age of consent laws weren't put there to protect children, not at all. The age of consent in a couple of US states at one time was age 7 years old when it was implemented. Other states were around age 10 to 12. The age of consent laws aren't there to protect children, they are there to help implement eugenics IE genocide of the populations.
If anyone actually thinks the age of consent was put there to protect children, you will have a hard time explaining how it is that those that made those laws that claim they care about children are the first ones to speak out in favor of abortion and that's not protecting children, is it?
It's said to be their body their choice, but that choice only extends to them when it's for murdering their child IE abortion. They can't choose to have sex with someone over the age can they? But wait, it's their body their choice, wasn't it? No? Where did that suddenly go? But they can murder their baby at any age (their body their choice, very selectively). Those that made and raised the age of consent over the years did so in order to help get rid of our populations while they secretly kept up the status quo. And despite what everyone thinks and the attempted claims put forward, those laws they made were not Christian laws either, they were made by the Marxist eugenics that be. Don't believe what I'm telling you? Go read UN agenda 2030, then watch this video. This is who made the age of consent laws, right there in the video.
I agree with some of what you said, every year the age of consent is getting lower and lower and there’s no reason for a child to consent to sex, it’s just another excuse to get away with rape and pedophelia.
In other words you agree with the antichrist? Those are the ones that actually raised the age of consent. The age of consent is not God's law, it's man's law and it's put there to get rid of the population. Ask yourself how it was that the age of consent was at a time as low as age 7 and yet it worked fine? What changed it? Marxist eugenic changed it. As you dig deeper and deeper you will see. One reason it was done was to allow enough time to indoctrinate females with feminism, turn on males and put their minds off of family and on education and career. And by the time the females realized they were getting to old, it would be too late to do anything about it. Which is exactly what they planed from the beginning and along with abortion it worked like a charm to begin the end of the population.
I think the age of consent should be 16-18 or somewhere there, I don’t think it’s ok for a child to consent to sex. Like it’s not ok for a 7 year old child to have sex with a freaking 17 year old.
Then you believe in the Karl Marx philosophy aka an antichrist. And let me ask you this. If she's 7 years old and having sex anyway, gets pregnant by an 10 or 11 year old, still allowed to get an abortion regardless of age, what difference does the numbers make a 10 or 11 year old versus a 17 year old? I'll tell you the difference. The 17 year old would be more able to work and provide for her and the baby, which the 10 or 11 year old could not. And therefor it would work. And being that it would or could work was not the intentions of those that made the consent laws, again eugenicist. Everything was carefully crafted in order to rid the population and they're not even keeping that a secrete anymore, are they?
First of all your really justifying rape and pedophelia? Because you said it would be better because a 17 year old can provide, that’s just utter bs. Your trying to justify being a pervert. All these age of consent laws that are very low were created so old disgusting men and woman could have a loophole to rape and abuse children with “consent”. Not I’m not part of whatever Antichrist your talking about, I just believe In protecting children. I don’t see what abortion has to do with any of this.
You don't understand how the devil works do you? He loves death hates life. I don't want to see the world genocided leaving only the elite behind to enjoy it, do you? I want to be surrounded by beautiful children everywhere I look, not abort them, I wish I had children of my own. But that's what the age of consent was designed to do, get rid of our population. Do you get that?
I don't know. Sargon of Akkad did a very interesting break down on this and stated he didn't know if it was true because their isn't enough evidence (most of it is here say and highly suspicious but not concrete) but as he pointed out, that doesn't mean it didn't happen or is not happening now as in Europe and the UK they had a similar situation that all ended up coming out after many of the higher up players died (like Saville who was friends with prince Andrew (who was also friends with Epstein (and whent to his private island multiple times)). According to Epsteins black book he had connections to multiple people, several of which had been busted for pedophilia or sexual assault against a minor (the actor kevin spacey was in that book and had visited the island, then two years later it came out he sexually assaulted a fourteen year old boy. Highly suspicious to say the least.).
So I can't say it definitively is the case without solid evidence (again, all the evidence adds up but none of it is concrete (very close but not quite reaching that threshold). That said, I would not be surprised by it, not by a long shot and do operate on the premise that it was probably the case (maybe not all those suspected where involved, maybe it didn't play out exactly as is claimed but something happened, their was a ring (that much is pretty clear with Epstein) and their were more then likely more then a few powerful people involved.).
The media displays them as crazy. Because conspiracy theorist don't watch television 24/7 and believe everything the media tells us. We do our research unlike some people.
Yes the earth is flat, maybe the universe? Try that. It's not that people just don't want to believe you regardless, it's just that more revolutionary your claim the more evidence you will/would have to put up...
@Sweetener_ Nope, you are in fact actually crazy. People who believe these ridiculous conspiracy theories are crazy. Nuts. Complete Looney Tunes. You think instead of getting your information from reputable sources in the media like every other sane person, watching Youtube videos with overly dramatic music and a guy with a deep voice telling you you're about to learn secrets the government doesn't want you to know about makes you "woke" and the rest of us are just gullible sheeple? You're only 15. You still have time to straighten your life out before you become some middle aged loon yelling at her cats all day about radio waves being sent by the government to fry her brain.
@sensible27 Not all conspiracy theorists believe that the earth is flat. For example I have other things to think about than to worry about the shape of the earth. And that doesn't disprove there other claims either.
@sensible27 And don't believe everything conspiracy theorists tell you. Most of the things they say are facts but you should always ask questions and do your research to see if what they're saying is really true.
@Sweetener_ I do know you. You've already told me everything I need to know about you. I've been around a little longer than you have, seen a few more things than you have and maybe I do actually know about what conspiracy theorists do, maybe even better than you do though I'm sure you think you've got so much knowledge and life experience at 15 that that's simply not possible. You're young, stubborn, uneducated and yet you think you've already got it all figured out. That's a pretty lethal combination. I hope you come to realize you're being conned before you become a complete social pariah by 20.
Again, you clearly do not know me 😂 you came at me saying I'm crazy, nut and lunatic now you're saying, I'm educated and stubborn, assumptions which are clearly false. If I'm all those claims you aren't any better than me. You're a 38 years old man arguing with a 15 years old girl and calling her all type of names only because she's a conspiracy theorist. I am, and I'm proud of that, if you don't like that and if I'm so crazy as you claim next time keep scrolling 💞
I'm gonna be honest here. It seems like every other day, a "right wing conspiracy theory" turns out to be true. Chances are, this is a real thing as well. It's a weird world. And with all the legit weird circumstances around Epstein, child trafficking, and those powerful politicians, it actually makes more sense than not.
"Dems are after our guns" - proven true by the Democratic presidential candidates.
"virus came from a lab" - strong evidence suggests this is true, but the coverup is still on.
"Russia gate" - turned out the fbi, DNC, and Obama were all involved and setting Trump up. The facts are there.
"Dems support Antifa" - they're literally bailing them out of jail as we speak after they get arrested for arson, looting, and the murder of people, all in the name of "protest".
"Aliens are real"- the government has released videos and made statements confirming this now.
Which conspiracy theory will be proven to be true next? Might be pizza gate. I wouldn't be surprised.
It's been debunked time and time again. Hillary Clinton is not running and has never run a child trafficking ring out of a pizza place in the Georgetown neighborhood of Washington D. C. (Or any other place for that matter). Please stop spreading this nonsense based on these sketchy youtube videos and the right wing nutjobs who post them.
Please read this or any of the dozens of other legitimate articles that explain this is bullshit when you simply Google "pizzagate".
This was entirely created during the 2016 campaign by Russian trolls working on behalf of Trump, alt right types in the U. S. supoorting Trump and right wing conspiracy nutjobs like Alex Jones to help Trump's campaign and hurt Hillary. Trump was never mentioned as a part of this, just Hillary and other Democrats close to her. Conspiracy theories about this, about Hillary's health, about the Clinton Foundation, about her e-mails... anything they could possibly think of to start a conspiracy about and to hurt her campaign. It is strictly a far right wing tactic.
I agree most conspiracies are total nonsense, regardless of their origin. However, Rolling Stone is not a viable source for actual news beyond music. A number of times in the past their writers and editors have gotten in trouble for not properly vetting stories or even outright lying and embellishing in certain stories. That's not a conspiracy.
@NYCQuestions1976 That's not the point. The point is Pizzagate was an absurd conspiracy theory to begin with and has been widely debunked by every legitimate news source. Pick one of the other 30 articles debunking it that come up when you Google Pizzagate if this one doesn't work for you. I just picked one at random. Don't bury the lead.
@NYCQuestions1976 You thinking the story isn"t credible because you have issues with Rolling Stone's journalism does not make the story not credible. It's widely accepted Pizzagate was a baseless conspiracy theory. Is picking at which article out of many I happened to link to really a helpful exercise? Pick a different hill to die on. Look at the bigger picture and stop wasting my time.
There's really no need to be obnoxious. You chose the weakest link out of many, not me. I'm sorry that you feel pointing out the reality that Rolling Stone is not a credible source of factual information is a waste of your time. As for Hillary, since you brought her up earlier, the only person that ruined her presidential campaign in 2016 is Hillary Clinton. If she had spent even one week paying attention to the Midwest, she would've won easily. This year the Democrats had an opportunity to have a real winning presidential candidate in Tulsi Gabbard, but Hillary Clinton torpedoed her campaign with false accusations against her. Now because of her, the Democratic party is stuck with Joe Biden. Oh well whatever.
Anyway, nice chat, good luck, and agree to disagree I suppose. 👍
@NYCQuestions1976 Here's the point you don't seem to be able to grasp despite multiple attempts to explain it. There's a time and a place for everything. If using a source you feel may have issues contributes to someone getting an inaccurate or skewed picture of an event that happened, then you point it out. If however, it's one among dozens of articles all saying the same thing, then chances are the reporting in this article is correct and going on and on about how you don't like the reporting methods that particular source has used in the past is pretty ridiculous because it doesn't change the outcome or the point of the comment and yes, it wastes everyone's time and energy on a needless distraction that is not material to the overall conclusion being drawn.
It would be like if someone posted the conclusion that "Hitler killed a lot of Jews" and attached a link from one of thousands of articles all reaching the same conclusion and you choosing to go on and on about how perhaps Hitler did kill a lot of Jews but the specific story chosen as a source is from a publication that in the past has provided inaccurate counts of the actual number of holocaust victims by miscounting the number of skulls recovered from mass graves outside of Auschwitz. It doesn't change the conclusion being drawn. It just creates an unnecessary distraction with a focus on something that is immaterial to and doesn't change the overarching point of the comment. It's just being anal retentive and it's not helpful though you may think somehow you're adding something useful.
@NYCQuestions1976 And I only brought up Hillary in the context of her being the target of the Pizzagate conspiracy theory. I didn't get into her campaign strategy or the obvious errors almost all of us agree she made so I have no idea why you felt the need to go there. And as far as Tulsi Gabbard is concerned, she torpedoed her own campaign by questioning whether Assad in Syria was really using chemical weapons on his own people despite it being the overwhelming conclusion of the U. S. intelligence community as well as being too soft on transgressions by Russia. She brought it on herself. She gave everyone the impression she was naive and could be easily manipulated by foreign leaders far more experienced than her who do that for a living. She was and is profoundly unqualified to be president and her absolute failure to gain any traction whatsoever from anyone at any point in the campaign speaks to that not just being my opinion. I truly don't understand how anyone could actually believe she's qualified to be leader of the free world but as you said, we agree to disagree.
I would definitely agree with your overall assessment on Gabbard's qualifications if the Democrats had settled on a "Bill Clinton" or "Barack Obama" type of candidate (yes I know not them specifically because they both served two terms... I mean of their ilk). Even Andrew Cuomo. Then I would definitely be crazy to bring up Gabbard... but Joe Biden?
@NYCQuestions1976 Unfortunately, there wasn't a Barack Obama type candidate this time around even though the initial field was as big as it's ever been. I don't however believe the absence of someone like that is a reason to choose someone too junior and unqualified. Unfortunately, it's not enough to be thoughtful, competent, level headed, experienced and intelligent anymore. You've got to be dripping with charisma to generate those catchphrases and 30 second video clips and sound bites that make people go Wow! Someone like Michael Bennet of Colorado, extremely well spoken, experienced, intelligent, knowledgeable and thoughtful would have in my opinion been an excellent candidate but he never had a chance cause he's got all the charisma of a doorknob.
I think Elizabeth Warren is a disingenuous phony who had a lot of people fooled. Ultimately, they caught on. Her finishing 3rd in her own state says it all. I believe Bernie is sincere and means every word he says but I fundamentally disagree with making things toitally free. If something is free, that's the value you place on it and I believe everyone needs to have even a tiny bit of skin in the game in terms of their own financial commitment. I also believe making something free for everyone ignores the fact that some people could pay for it even though others may not be able to and giving it to them for free is a waste of taxpayer dollars at a time when our budget deficit is at truly dangerous levels. Besides, if Bernie couldn't get his own supporters to actually come out to vote for him, how is he going to pull moderate Republican undecideds? There was no way Biden should have been able to run the table on Bernie like he did when Biden's candidacy was all but dead and yet he did which tells me Bernie has the most vocal supporters who make a lot of noise but his support is really not that deep.
@NYCQuestions1976 And so we have Biden. I don't think he's particularly strong as a candidate but I think he'll make a much better president than he does a candidate. I think most people recognize this and want to once again have a president who is a decent person, whose heart is in the right place and will make good, humane decisions surrounded by smart competent people, not cronies, lackeys and ass kissing yes men and women. He needs to be super aggressive pointing out the differences between him and Trump and with Trump's horrible response to the coronavirus and his tone deaf response to the protests, Trump has given him more than enough material to make that case. Trump won't play fair and will have commercials that lie and distort. I'm not saying Biden should sink to Trump's level but he's got to take off the gloves and really let Trump have it.
I think Biden if he wins will be a one term president so his VP choice is crucial. I liked Amy Klobuchar early on but I think she's out of it now with her record as a prosecutor in Minnesota. He's committed that his VP will be a woman and right now, it wouldn't be bad if it was a woman of color as race relations has become as important an issue as the economy or the coronavirus. They say Kamala Harris is the front runner right now and I'm OK with that but Keisha Lance Bottoms, the Mayor of Atlanta has absolutely wowwed me every time I've heard her speak. She's smart, confident, not afraid to say what she thinks even if it is not politically expedient at that moment (which is my biggest issue with Harris) and her backstory is excellent. I hope he picks her. Biden's got to win. If Trump gets 4 more years and knows he doesn't have to run for re-election and no one in Congress will stop him from doing whatever he wants, I really fear for the United States future as a Democracy and I'm not overstating it
@NYCQuestions1976 Forgot to mention, Cuomo would have been excellent and he could stand toe to toe Trump and not take any of his shit but unfortunately timing is everything and his star just rose too late in the process for him to effectively get in the race. Had all this happened a year ago, it would be a different story.
Oh yes, this is what you need to do to become one of these popular guys.. you need to start liking underage girls and children, and that will make you successful. What you are basically saying is all the famous people need to like the idea of sexual thoughts about children. Now there are two options, eitherall the people who have such an idea get an advantage that normal people don't get or it's just the natural human desire to like children (far more than adults, in a romantic way) and they are just the ones to get to live their dream... I don't know what or which one you think it is... How do people resort to such genius idea, I just don't understand.
It's a conspiracy theory that could have got people killed. Literally.
Somebody believed the rubbish they'd read online and went to a pizza place with a gun. He got 4 years, the originators of the BS should have got 8, but they're still around spreading the same kind of nonsense.
This is definitely the sort of thing that I'm inclined to believe, which is exactly why I remain skeptical. I try to reserve judgement until I see evidence, but these days it's hard to tell what is real and what isn't. Could this one be real? It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest, but I trust the truth will eventually come out. It's getting harder and harder to hide things in the modern world.
Waste of time Some things are true but not everything The real conspiracies are the ones people accept and tolerate Like the homosexual agenda The blasphemers against christ Transgender agenda Jewish banking Evolution
it's very real. The elite of every society throughout the ages have molested the young and the helpless. This is just the latest iteration ft 21st century
Do you remember the person who brought a gun to a pizza parlor because he read that Hillary was running a child sex ring from its basement? One small problem, it didn't have a basement.
@scarlett774 I agree. You are and you seem like a good person. I just think you have been misled here and are giving more airtime to something that no legitimate person should ever be taking seriously. Watch the youtube videos for entertainment value if they amuse you but I recommend against spreading stuff like this and encouraging people to take a look. Of course, you're free to do what you want but these are the reactions you will get.
I agree with you guys to a certain extent, I actually find it so interesting that this app has a different dynamic, because if you would go on Twitter and instagram it would be the liberals believing these things and the conservatives saying it’s bullshit, but thanks for letting me know lmao
Scarlett, while each political party has their own fringe crazies no one pays attention to, no legitimate liberals believe pizzagate or any of these other conspiracy theories. None. They may say as these right wingers do, "I'm a liberal but this seems like it could be real", just like they go on twitter and say "I've voted Democratic all my life but I'm supporting Trump cause I think he's doing a great job". It's all bullshit. They're not who they say they are. You're only 17. Your bullshit detector is still developing.
Most Helpful Opinions