
What Do You Think of This Picture on The Magazine?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
That cover is from 21 MAY 2012. I hope this is a better version of the cover showing Jamie Lynne Grumet, a slim blonde then 26-year-old California mom, breastfeeding her then 3-year-old son, Aram.

I don't think it - attachment parenting - is a big deal. Given how fucked-up the world is with normal parenting, I don't see how this can be worse.
In 1994, I knew a woman who breastfed even when the kid could talk.
2-year old would say "Drinks." and the mother would whip one out.
I will let the woman on the cover, Jamie Lynne Grumet, tell her story...
https://mom.com/entertainment/27667-how-being-cover-time-changed-everything
Here is HuffPo's take on it:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jamie-lynne-grumet-breastfeeding-time-magazine-cover_n_1506096
By the way, "Amy Farrah Fowler" aka actress / neuroscientist Mayim Bialik is for "attachment parenting" also.
I agree with your comment. I fully support public breast feeding but this is intentionally inflammatory and people like this lose my support
Look I'm a fourth generation feminist - my great-grandmother went from dirt poor, put herself through night school & came to own multiple rental properties in the UK & Canada on her own hook as she married once & he died in WWI - where women have been raised to have not just respect for yourself but others.
And women like in this photo. Women who make a scene in public settings breastfeeding rather than being decent and having a blanket to cover - look if I am in a restaurant I am paying for my food and the service not for some woman's bare floppy breast (if I wanted that I'd go to a strip club) & her brat - are embarrassing.
They are merely attention seekers. Nothing worth note. But most certainly good for a laugh when they finally leave.
If you want to breastfeed that's fine and no one should give you shit for it, but when you start doing photoshoots and trying to provoke people (I've personally seen 2 people do this) it's no longer about feeding your child it's about your need for attention. Also the 'hook' is definitely shaming people which is not ok.
Opinion
22Opinion
I am very much for women being given the chance to openly breast feed their kids.
it’s a choice, you can sit there and do it or cover up, or move some place quiet, however it needs to be a sensible choice available and no discrimination.
The photo on the magazine just really fucks things up.
A simple photo of a mum feeding her 6 month old kid would have sufficed, they just comes over as odd.
yes I know some kids are fed older, but it’s not really the norm.
that and the entire Attachment Parenting thing often causes more issues than not.
As a father I have had numerous ‘discussions’ about it with various friends, as for example that photo could have been a father bottle feeding is child.
at that age its ridiculous, he's got teeth and comes off like an unhealthy codependency situation with parent and child -- like making the kid totally inept to deal with life by literally breast feeding at that age. hell why not breast feed till 19 or 20? i mean this worlds lost it badly. why would breast feeding a kid and that age make you woman enough? having our periods make us woman enough, going through menopause, giving birth, insanity i swear i wanna go live in the woods away from this world.
Cookie I think the magazine cover photo is in very poor taste. I'm very supportive of mothers breast feeding, even in public settings. But putting what looks like a 4-year-old breast feeding on a magazine cover is gratuitous. And I agree with you about the message in the caption.
@Silas_153 He's supposed to be 3 but he looks way older.
I was a manager in a McDonald's in Florida for several years. Florida has a state law that grants women the right to nurse their children in public places including restaurants and that included the McDonald's where I worked. On one occasion an old man demanded that I have a nursing mother arrested for indecent exposure. When I refused he called the police and when they got there he demanded they arrest the women, take her children away then arrest me for not calling the police. Instead the officers arrested him. So now we have a sign up on the spot where she was sitting that reads: THIS SECTION RESERVED FOR NURSING MOTHERS AND THEIR FAMILIES." Babies need to be fed regularly. What would you have a woman do with her hungry children?
well, that kid looks a little old to be breastfeeding and it could be bad for his health, mainly the formation of his teeth but other than that I don't see a problem. Also, before anybody starts with the whole it's a sexual organ thing 1 it's a secondary sex characteristic like a beard, 2 SHE'S TAKING CARE OF HER CHILD, 3 you can look away, 4 I find women attractive, I like boobs however I don't find it gross or sexy or indecent for a mother to take care of her child if anything I think "man she looks tired" or "dang, that kid's hungry"
Aren't there websites that let you put your own pictures on what looks like a TIME magazine cover? Yes, yes, there are (see below).
But this one's real, and the boy is 3 years old.
"Jamie Lynne Grumet, photographed by Martin Schoeller with her 3-year-old son, is a mother from Los Angeles who subscribes to attachment parenting, the subject of staff writer Kate Pickert’s cover story."
https://time.com/3450144/behind-the-cover-are-you-mom-enough/
I knew a mother who did something similar, it's different, but it's her choice, and nobody else's.
A true mom doesn’t care about society’s opinion of how motherly she is. All she cares about is looking after her children, she does that without seeking validation and publicity.
How many women around the world struggle in silence yet take good care of their children without complaining a bit, while some privileged women publish semi nude pictures of their pregnancy and breastfeeding in Magazines. Furthermore, they start looking for a nanny and nursery school before the baby is even born.
It doesn’t feel like they’re being genuine to be honest. It feels that they’re just trying to seem like they’re supporting a movement just to appeal to more people.
I’m all for breastfeeding in public and doing what you want with your own body but how old is that kid 😂
I seriously hope that pic is photoshopped 😳 either way that poor kid 🤦♀️
Mom enough to breastfeed their 8 yrold kid? I'm confused... what exactly is it trying to say?
Or five I guess...
Unpostive thoughts , it makes you wonder why a mom would continue to breastfeed a child who is way past his age to be breastfed?
Well, it IS 'Time Magazine'. What can you expect from those depraved idiots?
I agree with you 100%. I have no objection to mothers feeding their infants, but sometimes, honestly, it's like they're daring you to say something.
It’s fine if you want to breastfeed for long term, just do it in private
Maybe just a bit virtue signally for money. I wonder if times really truly cares about this or not.
Lol I don't really care cause I don't let micro issues like this piss me off.
The decision should be left to the mother and mother only.
Why the hell are you gatekeeping breastfeeding, though?
I don't care. It's photoshoot, not real life. Also I'm not concerned about others feeding their children in public, none of my business
I can't help noticing that kid's look. 😂😂 i can see him in the future saying oh yeah i was on Time magazine and i was suckling a nipple. Lol
the kid is way too frickin old. Lucky little sucker
Kids to old to still be breast feeding
I think that kid is too old for breast feeding
That kid will be bullied his whole life.
I didn;t even know it was still being published.
I really don't think so.
Abusive
My mind's blank
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions