A black supremacist activist intentionally drove his car through a parade killing 6 and injuring 50+, he tried to hurt as many people as people, there are 6 children still in a critical condition in ICU... But for liberals he was just having a bad day.This one even rationalizes murdering random people and children as "karma"
Updates
+1 y
Everyone who's saying/ that the black supremacist who did that mass murder was "fleeing from another crime" or "running away from the police" IS DELIBERATELY LYING AND SPREADING FALSE INFORMATION!
The police chief in Waukesha admitted in a press conference that those incidents never happened.
The thing is, liberals convinced our society that only white people can be racist. Now they're cooking the narrative that only white people can be terrorist and commit hate crimes.
Why are liberals and the mainstream media treating the deadly anti-white hate crime that happened in Waukesha as a "car accident"?
12.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
Liberals get embarrassing results from their failed policies all the time. The press downplays them. Keep the population in the dark or distract them from what they are really doing. Imagine shipping thousands of illegal aliens all over the country with no vaccinations amd doing it in the middle of the night so nobody finds out. If we had a real non biased media this could never happen. This was a direct result of "bail reform". In every other civilized country in the world this dirtbag would have been locked up for good.
1
0 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
Why is everything turned into a political or racial debate? It's so annoying. And stupid. Especially when both sides are of the same corrupt ass coin. This idiot is gonna be locked under the jail and rightfully so. But trying to label him as some black supremacist that sought out whites to kill is creating a story to fit a narrative. The fact is that he was fleeing from another crime. Saying that isn't excusing anything he did. It's stating what actually happened. You people get hard ons from painting these false scenarios in your heads. It's very weird.
1
7 Reply
Asker
+1 y
"The fact is that he was fleeing from another crime"
You should be ashamed of yourself for spreading false information so deliberately.
There wasn't any police pursuit in the area, he wasn't fleeing the police as the police chief admitted in a press conference, and you are a fucking liar. Why do you do this?
Opinion Owner
+1 y
You mean the same shit YOU'RE doing?
Opinion Owner
+1 y
You don't make any points. Did I say he was fleeing police? No. I said he was fleeing from another crime. Last I checked, domestic violence is still a crime. You know what else police said? That it wasn't terrorism. You don't care about that tho.
Asker
+1 y
Put the fucking crack pipe down. As I said, you're so desperate to try to dismiss my points that you do so at expense of you not making any sense. My question is, are you on drugs or did our education system fail you to the point of not seeing the contradiction in saying, "Did I say he was fleeing police? No. I said he was fleeing from another crime."
And you do it just because you think black people can't do hate crimes. Our society already believes that black people can't be racist, now they are cooking the narrative that they can't be domestic terrorists or hate crime perps.
Opinion Owner
+1 y
You're a fucking idiot that's talking in circles. And making zero sense. And pulling shit from your ass. Typical conservative moron. Your comprehension skills suck and I can't be bothered anymore. It's clear you're looking for certain answers that fit your warped ass racist narrative. So at this point you can talk to yourself.
Asker
New+1 y
You're so desperate. You wouldn't be so if you put the crack pipe down.
I refuse that a sober person can be as dumb as you. With your intellect, you can only be useful as paperweight. 😆
Asker
New+1 y
By the way, the fact that I hate your cult doesn't mean I like republicans/conservatives either. It just means that I hate your cult.
Just like when the media is okay with a liberal White woman wearing a gorilla mask and throwing eggs at Larry Elder, or harassing Candice Owens and making hateful statements. Anyone that isn't racist against Whites is an enemy to the liberals.
2
1 Reply
Asker
+1 y
"Anyone that isn't racist against Whites is an enemy to the liberals."
Because it doesn't fit their narrative of white people as oppressors. Therefore they downplay the races of the killer and victims and the fact he was out on bail that was set much too low because of leftist prosecutors and their terrible "bail reform" ideas.
They're propagandists and this odious crime doesn't fit the false narrative that they promote. They also don't have a problem with whites or Jews dying and they don't have a problem with black supremacists or any violence committed by any leftist.
They are not liberals. Classical liberalism is dead. It has be replaced with progressive socialism. We are very close to communism. Then all the morons in the media will be sent to the reeducation camps if they are lucky.
Now imagine if a white guy ran over 6 black people. It would be 24/7 media coverage that all white people are out to kill all black people. Wisconsin would be in flames.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
Because it runs against their narrative and EVERY story can be reported ONLY in relation to that narrative. If it doesn't fit, it's ignored or altered.
It's not conflating with a few people on social media, let's not mince words: in no uncertain terms this is the *mainstream media* narrative.
We know he's a black supremacist the wealth of posts the guy has encouraging violence against white people, black nationalism, and all manner of racist memes against white people, etc. The dude was not subtle in the slightest.
Not that covering shit like this up is anything new, there have been plenty of instances of it in recent years, but people are noticing in this case because of it's timing in relation to the Rittenhouse verdict. We can look at the contrasts and notice a problem. Rittenhouse was *immediately* labelled a terrorist, sentenced a day later and accused of carrying a machine gun across state lines and hunting down black protesters in the name of white supremacy, even though we had all the video from day one showing otherwise. But with Brooks, there's actual demonstrable racism from him, yet you can look at all the media articles using passive language and just calling it a "crash" despite all the evidence showing otherwise. Then we can look at another comparison, a somewhat similar crime: The guy who drove though the crowd at Charlottesville, a white guy drives through a crowd and the language immediately damning and not passive, it's this is a terrorist attack by a white supremacist etc etc. A black guy runs over a bunch of innocent people on purpose and it's "just a crash", and they neglect to mention is racist history. It's just another one of thousands of examples of how the media is manipulating ignorant people.
17.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
Those people are idiots.
0
0 Reply
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Home > Society & Politics > Questions > Why are liberals and the mainstream media treating the deadly anti-white hate crime that happened in Waukesha as a "car accident"?
