They've been doing COVID camps in Canada for a while... Several months at least... They are building them all over... Time for you to kill yourself some commies. Same is true for Australia and UK is working on it... Democrat states in the USA are also working on it in Oregon and Washington... Dark times will come to those who do not make a stand against the communists...
01 Reply- +1 y
New York is doing it as well...
legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2021/a416
Most Helpful Opinions
Anonymous(30-35)+1 ySort of. Here in Australia, there are instances of mandates saying "we're not going to *force* you into this camp, but you're not allowed to leave your house, even for food -- but we've got this van to take you to this nice camp if you like". They'll do it if you just *know someone* with covid.
012 Reply
Opinion Owner+1 y@goaded Apparently not. Cops won't let it happen. It's creepy shit. Even if they weren't stopping that, it's shit entirely unacceptable to restrict people like that. But it's not like it's that new, Australia is a nation descendant from convict-slaves and their jailors. We've always had a problem with authoritarian policing, and no bill of rights to protect us from infringement from the government.
When it comes to "knowing someone" they're probably not going to care about your cousins. It's more like your mother on the other side of town gets sick and even though you test negative, they might decide you're to close to let it slide and tell you to get in the van. The point is that it's arbitrary, if *they* decide that you're likely enough to have come in contact then it's the van for you. No, due process, just get in the van. And whether you're willing to go with them or not, it's not optional to leave. People have tried escaping from the camp and the cops track them down. It's not "we recommend you quarantine" or "please quarantine", it's "get in the van, go to the camp, and you're not allowed to leave unless we let you". There's double layered electrified fencing ffs. Very creepy.- +1 y
Which state? Victoria seems to be ready and willing to provide essentials:
https://www.coronavirus.vic.gov.au/node/15350
Honestly, it doesn't sound much different to the English regulations, only they won't accommodate people who are quarantining.
www.healthdirect.gov.au/coronavirus-covid-19-self-isolation-faqs
Opinion Owner+1 yFirstly, I don't see what part of that sounds reasonable. The government shouldn't have that power.
Secondly, my point about the problem of authoritarian cops is that they won't necessarily follow those rules -- they government sets the agenda and we have this problem of cops willing to overstep to get the desired results.
As far as I know we still haven't passed a bill of rights and we rely on the United Nations treaty to define our rights. But that has a number of holes which essentially means if a government decides what it does to it's people is justified, then they're not violating any rights. It's an international agreement with an international body. Unless you're committing a major genocide then wtf is going to happen? Nothing. Who is going to step in? No one. The Queen? Doubt it, even if she did have the authority (it's not clear whether she does even though we're a monarchy). Da fuq is the UN gonna do if the Australian government likes to push the boot into people's necks here and there and *grants itself* the right to do so? Nothing.
Opinion Owner+1 y@goaded We haven't had someone outside the big two parties win a federal election in 80 years. I doubt anything interesting is going to happen in March.
I'd be better if that 99.9915% also had their rights respected.
A government respecting liberty? Crazy idea apparently.- +1 y
Nearly as crazy as expecting people to abey laws to keep each other safe, apparently. The difference being that breaking them could have killed tens of thousands.
It must be terrible having both major parties agree that keeping people alive is a worthwhile goal for government. But at least you have the opportunity to vote for different parties without wasting your vote entirely. - +1 y
@goaded The policies themselves inflicted untold deaths and human suffering.
Be it through releasing elderly back into their care homes and dosing them up with Midazolam, effectively euthanising them.
Slapping DNRs on disabled people, and a whole host of vulnerable people.
Infecting older people with such terror, that they were too scared to go to the hospital, even if they were suspected of having a heart attack or stroke - because they didn't want to catch covid.
Trashing the health service, so that it's only focus is pretty much on jabbing the entire population in perpetuity, on a non stop rolling basis, so no one bothers to make an appointment now anyway (I certainly don't). Cancers and heart diseases and the like are now less likely to be caught early effectively condemning a large number of people to death. Waiting lists through the roof, again, creating untold suffering as people have to live and probably die with certain conditions.
We know excess deaths are up despite the success of your jab campaign and a small proportion of these excess deaths being attributable to covid.
People have been psychologically destroyed and have lost hope, likely killing a large number of people who were on the precipice. Because I know, to you, only covid kills people. But in reality will to live is so important in one's personal mortality.
Isolating and psychologically destroying people in general.
This is only the tip of an iceberg.
But we know, in your new religion, the only harm and suffering that can be inflicted is directly through covid.
All of your figures are total bullshit and distortions of the truth. - +1 y
@Levin "The policies themselves inflicted untold deaths and human suffering"
How many deaths? (You know we're talking about Australia, right? Where there have been a total of 2,252 deaths.)
I guess you want to talk about New York, but Florida overtook them in absolute numbers of dead months ago, and are just 100 deaths per million behind, when back in June 2020, they were at 2,700 deaths to NY's 31,000 (114 to 1,538 deaths per million).
Tell me how 30,000 deaths (1,547 per million) after the initial panic is worse than 61,000 (2,795). - +1 y
@Levin Oh, right, so we're talking about Johnson and the Tories. Wasn't a lot of the damage done by not taking it seriously at the beginning, and the farce of "natural herd immunity" (which is just letting the virus kill as many people as it can)?
Would you say the UK was suffering more or less than Germany? Did you have more restrictions, less, or about the same?
There have been nearly 150,000 deaths in the UK (2,172 per million), and 113,000 in Germany (with 30% larger population, so 1,339).
I agree that the UK government could have done much better, but only by doing more, not less. - +1 y
Correction: the population of Germany is 23% larger than the UK's, not 30%.
I see what you are getting at, but you really have to look at the facts. For example, there were actually 10% fewer suicides in 2020 than the average of 2016-2019, and that number was 5,224, which is a fraction of the pandemic numbers of up to a thousand or more a day at times.
www.ons.gov.uk/.../2020registrations
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
12Opinion
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yProbably not.
To be honest I don't get my shots just because people tell me to get it.
I don't like being told what to do, especially since people with the covid shots can still contract tge virus and spread it. It doesn't make sense to me that so. e are shaming others for not having the vaccinations when it doesn't affect anyone but the unvaccinated person.00 Reply- 734 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIt's fake news, some truths but mostly lies to bend the truth into the opposite of what it really is. Pick a country and the truths and lies vary.
10 Reply 6.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Absolutely not. Turn off the Faux News or whatever you are watching.
10 Reply
+1 yAt this point, anything is likely stupid and based in pseudoeffect 🤐
00 Reply5.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Of course not. (Why would you want an obvious nutcase to unblock you?)
00 Reply
+1 yAustralia is rounding people up. They won’t do that here in the US.
07 Reply- +1 y
@goaded www.theguardian.com/.../nt-police-search-for-three-people-who-escaped-from-howard-springs-covid-quarantine-facility
Right, totally voluntary to be there. - +1 y
- +1 y
- +1 y
"The concept of quarantine has been known since biblical times, and is known to have been practised through history in various places. Notable quarantines in modern history include the village of Eyam in 1665 during the bubonic plague outbreak in England"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quarantine
+1 yIt's happening in some countries.
00 Reply- 1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yPeople need to start using violence.
10 Reply - 5.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThat's completely false.
10 Reply 2.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Got to love those scared liberals
00 Replyonly if your sick with it...
00 Reply1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. not really sure
00 Reply
Reality check, are guns bad or the people using them?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News