


Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 


No agreement. I work with a bunch of no-agreement pedants in my line of work and I wouldn't wish their lives on my worst enemy. That's about the loneliest option I can think of among yours.
I remember this one in particular who argued with our designer until he was practically blue in the face. Our designer wanted to use red as a warning sign conforming to expected standards like red lights and so forth.
Then he found it so illogical and arbitrary to use red. I'm not even sure he had any alternative color in mind. He just repeated over and over how illogical it is to use red in this context until we were all like, "Dude, chill, red is a standard color used to indicate warnings and dangers. It might even have psychological significance like how blood is red, fire is red, people might even associate that to danger without social conditioning."
Then he'd just go on and on like, "It's still illogical! We should be logical!" Then he lost all of us with his insistence on being so logical while divorcing himself from ordinary people and the rest of humanity, and I think that's the worst way to be. It's the most hopeless way to be that smart and so divorced from humanity at the same time; smart enough to be miserable yet disconnected enough to be lonely.
Obviously option A.
Opinion
4Opinion
All of these except for Group A, C, and F are ones that are self-inflicted something can be done about, and most people who actually fall into Group C and aren't just denegrating themselves aren't fully aware of their situation.
Group A is frankly a lame excuse. If someone's life sucks that bad, it's certainly not entirely or even mostly because he's 5'11 or shorter.
Group F on the other hand is extremely case by case. Someone who was once fit and healthy until spontaneously developing major health issues or a crippling injury will more than likely hate their situation a lot more than someone who hasn't known anything else their whole life and has been living as best they can in the meantime.
So really out of all of these, Group F is the only one that I could honestly sympathize with.
I chose the wrong one... F is the worse...
happiness is not equal to romantic relationships
but the fact that the woman is in constant pain and death is soon and merciful would suck... i don't want to imagine not being able to run or play with a dog etc
you do know there are handsome men who enjoy being single?
No health, life sucks for them cause they don't even get to experiance being a kid or anything else cause most are sick or disabled and can't even see life like everyone else
The only right answer would be F. All the others could most likely do something to change their life. Just for info I fit in one of those other choices but I could do something to change how my life is going.
I think no health would be the worst. If you have your health everything ese is just icing on the cake. If you do not have health, nothing else is really worth anything.
A. Definitely
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions